https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318
Jim Michaels changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://webhome.cs.uvic.ca/~
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62318
Bug ID: 62318
Summary: optimization of string searches using Nigel Horspool's
Boyer-Moore-Horpool algorithm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62317
Bug ID: 62317
Summary: optimization of string searches using Nigel Horspool's
Boyer-Moore-Horpool algorithm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot com|
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62316
Bug ID: 62316
Summary: poor location for missing braces warning
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61341
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62315
Bug ID: 62315
Summary: do not print typename in diagnostic if the original
code does not have it
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60593
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Aug 30 18:47:04 2014
New Revision: 214757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-30 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/62278
PR fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62278
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Aug 30 18:47:04 2014
New Revision: 214757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-30 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/62278
PR fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Aug 30 18:47:04 2014
New Revision: 214757
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214757&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-08-30 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/62278
PR fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
There are other examples here:
http://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html#fix-it-hints
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
Bug ID: 62314
Summary: Fix-it Hints
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
The additional thread only touches iter, and the main thread does not touch
iter nor invalidate it. So there is nothing to protect here. The program does
not contain data races per se.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You don't protect either the iterators or the list when touching it so I don't
think this is a bug. If they truly independent lists and that was causing
issues, then yes there would be an issue.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dvyukov at google dot com
$ g++ -v
gcc version 5.0.0 20140830 (experimental) (GCC)
The program is:
===
#include
#include
#include
std::list::iterator iter, iter2;
void *thread(void *arg)
{
for (int i = 0; i < 100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62304
--- Comment #8 from dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Aug 30 14:34:02 2014
New Revision: 214752
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214752&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/62304
* gcc/reorg.c (skip_consecutiv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62304
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm ---
> Created attachment 33416
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33416&action=edit
> Candidate patch. Bootstrapped on x86_64; see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62015
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
18 matches
Mail list logo
