[Bug libfortran/62188] Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/62198] New: spurious warning - initialization discards qualifier from pointer target type for pointer to array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62198 Bug ID: 62198 Summary: spurious warning - initialization discards qualifier from pointer target type for pointer to array Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/62150] [5.0 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/fp16-mangle-1.C failed on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62150 wangzheyu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tony.wang at arm dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/62197] New: Option -Bprefix does not affect the search for the assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62197 Bug ID: 62197 Summary: Option -Bprefix does not affect the search for the assembler Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug lto/62032] FAIL: vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62032 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) > > I will try to test a patch, meanwhile, I am wondering if any combine expert > > has something to share. > > distribute_notes is certainly an endless

[Bug target/62111] ICE when building Linux kernel for sh64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62111 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/61214] [4.9/5 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 02:03:56 2014 New Revision: 214209 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214209&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/62091 * g++.dg/ipa/devirt-39.C: New. Added:

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:54:40 2014 New Revision: 214208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61214 PR tree-optimization/62091 * decl2.c (decl_neede

[Bug c++/61214] [4.9/5 regression] Weird interaction between -fvisibility-inlines-hidden, inline virtuals and devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61214 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:54:40 2014 New Revision: 214208 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214208&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61214 PR tree-optimization/62091 * decl2.c (decl_needed

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:17:37 2014 New Revision: 214206 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214206&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61566 * pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1): Ignore lambda

[Bug c++/60417] [DR 1518] Bogus error on C++03 aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60417 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Aug 20 01:16:31 2014 New Revision: 214205 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214205&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/60417 * init.c (build_vec_init): Set CONSTRUCTOR_IS_DIRECT_

[Bug c++/62196] New: running time segment fault with valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62196 Bug ID: 62196 Summary: running time segment fault with valarray Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug preprocessor/51303] -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings reported as [enabled by default]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51303 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/51303] -Wmissing-include-dirs warnings reported as [enabled by default]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51303 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Tue Aug 19 22:52:02 2014 New Revision: 214201 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214201&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-08-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR preprocesso

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Tue Aug 19 22:37:49 2014 New Revision: 214200 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214200&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-08-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR c/60975

[Bug c/53063] encode group options in the .opt files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53063 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Tue Aug 19 22:37:49 2014 New Revision: 214200 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214200&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2014-08-20 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR c/60975

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug other/60465] Compiling glibc-2.17,2.18 with gcc-4.8.2 and binutils-2.23.2,2.24 results in segfaults in _start / elf_get_dynamic_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60465 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #33349|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/62195] [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/62195] New: [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62195 Bug ID: 62195 Summary: [5 Regression] Invalid mnemonic 'xxlxor' on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with -m64 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug fortran/61847] bug in gfortran runtime: digits cut off when reading floating point number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #8 from Franz Sirl --- Hmm, what about the assignment part of the merged bug 44077: _Bool var = 3; Does the fix warn about this? Should I create a new bug report for this part?

[Bug c/62194] New: Add deadfield attribute to ignore initializers for a structure field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62194 Bug ID: 62194 Summary: Add deadfield attribute to ignore initializers for a structure field Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancem

[Bug c++/62189] Different result between 4.6 and 4.9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62189 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/62193] New: There is a bug in the Ada runtime which causes some Ada time functions to fail on the MinGW 32-bit platform .

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62193 Bug ID: 62193 Summary: There is a bug in the Ada runtime which causes some Ada time functions to fail on the MinGW 32-bit platform . Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Aug 19 18:50:00 2014 New Revision: 214183 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214183&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/62153 * doc/invoke.texi: Document -Wbool-compare. c-fami

[Bug c++/62192] New: Segmentation fault when linking with Qt libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62192 Bug ID: 62192 Summary: Segmentation fault when linking with Qt libraries Product: gcc Version: 4.7.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 19 18:25:45 2014 New Revision: 214181 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214181&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/62091 * decl2.c (decl_needed_p): Return true

[Bug target/62191] New: extra shift generated for vector integer division by constant 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62191 Bug ID: 62191 Summary: extra shift generated for vector integer division by constant 2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/62190] New: LTO DWARF produces __unknown__ type for unsigned int function argument type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62190 Bug ID: 62190 Summary: LTO DWARF produces __unknown__ type for unsigned int function argument type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c++/62189] New: Different result between 4.6 and 4.9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62189 Bug ID: 62189 Summary: Different result between 4.6 and 4.9.1 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug lto/53808] Undefined symbol when building a library with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 19 17:29:41 2014 New Revision: 214177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214177&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/53808 PR c++/61659 * decl.c (maybe_commonize_var): Don

[Bug ipa/61659] [4.9/5 Regression] Extra undefined symbol because of devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61659 --- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 19 17:29:41 2014 New Revision: 214177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214177&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/53808 PR c++/61659 * decl.c (maybe_commonize_var): Don

[Bug c/45584] typeof with casting from const to non-const does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45584 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/62188] Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 --- Comment #9 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #8) > Created attachment 33361 [details] > C++ source code Please ignore this attachment. It is for a different bug.

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 DJ Delorie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dj at redhat dot com --- Comment #4 from DJ

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #8 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 33362 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33362&action=edit C++ source code

[Bug debug/61033] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Infinite loop in variable tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug other/62168] error in configure: line 21572: test: =: unary operator expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62168 --- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Aug 19 16:23:36 2014 New Revision: 214168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214168&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Set install_gold_as_default to no first PR other/62168 * c

[Bug c++/62186] segfault on map.insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62186 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/55334] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] mgrid regression (ipa-cp disables vectorization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55334 vp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/62091] [5 Regression] ice in before_dom_children

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62091 --- Comment #7 from David Binderman --- I am not sure this is fixed. Attached code, when compiled by 20140817, with flags -std=gnu++11 -O2, does the following $ ../results/bin/gcc -c -std=gnu++11 -O2 bug161.cc listformatter.cpp: In member functi

[Bug c/45584] typeof with casting from const to non-const does not work properly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45584 --- Comment #2 from ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ppalka Date: Tue Aug 19 14:14:15 2014 New Revision: 214151 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214151&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-19 Patrick Palka PR c/45584 * c-typeck.c (

[Bug c++/62150] [5.0 regression] test case g++.dg/ext/arm-fp16/fp16-mangle-1.C failed on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62150 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug libfortran/62188] New: Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62188 Bug ID: 62188 Summary: Array bounds overrun in bessel_yn_r4/8/16 and other functions Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug libstdc++/62187] New: std::string==const char* could compare sizes first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62187 Bug ID: 62187 Summary: std::string==const char* could compare sizes first Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancemen

[Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining "extern template"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62186] New: segfault on map.insert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62186 Bug ID: 62186 Summary: segfault on map.insert Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com,

[Bug debug/59051] DW_tag_restrict_type not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59051 --- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard --- Author: mark Date: Tue Aug 19 11:50:55 2014 New Revision: 214143 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214143&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Emit DW_tag_restrict_type for restrict-qualified pointers. gcc/ChangeLog

[Bug sanitizer/61875] ATRIBUTE_NONNULL macro error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61875 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug sanitizer/62089] Sanitizer may fail to instrument struct accesses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62089 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62185] New warning for "defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class" / [-Wmismatched-tags]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62185 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62185] New: New warning for "defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class" / [-Wmismatched-tags]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62185 Bug ID: 62185 Summary: New warning for "defined as a struct here but previously declared as a class" / [-Wmismatched-tags] Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/62141] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: Segmentation fault: 11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62141 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c/61271] 10 * possible coding error with logical not (!)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Aug 19 11:35:39 2014 New Revision: 214142 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214142&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/61271 * cgraphunit.c (handle_alias_pairs): Fix condition.

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 > > --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > Eventually worth "fixing" the libstdc++ side to generate better > initial code? Replacing memcpy(,,3)+assign(,'\0') with memcpy(,,4) can indeed be done at the

[Bug target/62178] [AArch64] Performance regression on matrix matrix multiply due to r211211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62178 bin.cheng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker.cheng at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/62167] [tail-merge] dead type-unsafe load replaces type-safe load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62167 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/62167] [tail-merge] dead type-unsafe load replaces type-safe load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62167 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33360 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33360&action=edit tentative patch, testing atm

[Bug c/62183] [C/C++] Warning wished for "!int_val == const" / logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62183 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/62184] [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to 'while' loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62184 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c/62184] New: [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62184 Bug ID: 62184 Summary: [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee

[Bug c/62183] New: [C/C++] Warning wished for "!int_val == const" / logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62183 Bug ID: 62183 Summary: [C/C++] Warning wished for "!int_val == const" / logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/62182] New: New warning wished: operator== and "equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]"/-Wunsed-value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62182 Bug ID: 62182 Summary: New warning wished: operator== and "equality comparison result unused [-Wunused-comparison]"/-Wunsed-value Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug c/40989] -Werror= and #pragma diagnostics do not work with group flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40989 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining "extern template"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 --- Comment #2 from miles at gnu dot org --- Sorry, that got submitted accidentally (it turns out that RET in the web page Summary text-box is bound to "submit"!) I'm not sure how to delete a bogus report... ^^; Could you delete that? [I up

[Bug c++/62181] New: [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62181 Bug ID: 62181 Summary: [C/C++] Expected new warning: "adding 'char' to a string does not append to the string" [-Wstring-plus-int] Product: gcc Version: 5.0

[Bug c++/62175] Internal compiler error in gimplify_modify_expr gimplify.c:4616

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62175 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/62179] undefined reference linking failure when combining "extern template"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62179 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 --- Comment #3 from Jan Čapek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > C11 says something different here. I can see the following the -fstrict-volatile-bitfields documentation: "This option should be used if accesses to volatile bit-fi

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 --- Comment #2 from Jan Čapek --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > C11 says something different here. Can you be a bit more specific?

[Bug target/62180] (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code | Target|Renesas RX600

[Bug target/62180] New: (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62180 Bug ID: 62180 Summary: (RX600) - compiler doesn't honor -fstrict-volatile-bitfields and generates incorrect machine code for I/O register access Product: gcc Vers

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 18 Aug 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 > > --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)