[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/61641] [4.9/5 Regression] undefined label in jump_table_data

2014-08-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61641 --- Comment #9 from John David Anglin --- With the patch from comment #8, I find the failure of delay-slot-2.c was introduced in r209897: 2014-03-21 James Greenhalgh * calls.c (initialize_argument_information): Always treat PUSH_ARGS

[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

2014-08-15 Thread jj at chaosbits dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 Jesper Juhl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jj at chaosbits dot net --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug c++/62160] std::uppercase does not work for std::hex output

2014-08-15 Thread jj at chaosbits dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62160 Jesper Juhl changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |4.8.2 Severity|normal

[Bug c++/62160] New: std::uppercase does not work for std::hex output

2014-08-15 Thread jj at chaosbits dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62160 Bug ID: 62160 Summary: std::uppercase does not work for std::hex output Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

2014-08-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 15 22:27:06 2014 New Revision: 214049 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214049&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61566 * pt.c (lookup_template_class_1): Revert recent chan

[Bug c++/61566] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in write_unscoped_name

2014-08-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61566 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 15 21:59:40 2014 New Revision: 214046 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214046&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61566 * pt.c (instantiate_class_template_1): Ignore lambda

[Bug rtl-optimization/62030] wrong code due to ifcvt merging two stores which have different aliasing sets

2014-08-15 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62030 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Fri Aug 15 21:23:21 2014 New Revision: 214044 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214044&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code 2014-08-15 To

[Bug rtl-optimization/62004] dead type-unsafe load replaces type-safe load

2014-08-15 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62004 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Fri Aug 15 21:23:21 2014 New Revision: 214044 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214044&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix if-conversion pass for dead type-unsafe code 2014-08-15 To

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

2014-08-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Aug 15 21:19:33 2014 New Revision: 214043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214043&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-15 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/62142 * trans-expr.c (is

[Bug tree-optimization/62071] [4.10 Regression] ICE: in before_dom_children, at tree-ssa-pre.c:4411

2014-08-15 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62071 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- > On 08/14/2014 07:13 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >>On 08/14/2014 02:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > >>>I wonder what we should do with both external and comdat here. Jason, can > >>>we devirtualize? > >> > >>No, we

[Bug fortran/62106] [4.9/5 Regression] Adding a scalar variable to an array constructor gives wrong result

2014-08-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62106 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/62106] [4.9/5 Regression] Adding a scalar variable to an array constructor gives wrong result

2014-08-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62106 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Author: tkoenig Date: Fri Aug 15 20:47:30 2014 New Revision: 214038 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214038&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-15 Thomas Koenig Backport from trunk PR fortran/6210

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

2014-08-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread sven.c.dack at virginmedia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #47 from Sven C. Dack --- > default:84920k > profiled: 90176k > lto:71204k > lto-plugin: 60024k The new file sizes of cc1's are: default: 84920k profiled: 90176k lto: 71204k profiled-lto: 98556k

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread sven.c.dack at virginmedia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #46 from Sven C. Dack --- > ... > > > > avg stdev % > > > > default:282.86s0.56s, 0.20%100.00% (base) > > > > profiled: 255.76s0.72s, 0.28%+10.60% > > > > lto:282.80s

[Bug tree-optimization/62071] [4.10 Regression] ICE: in before_dom_children, at tree-ssa-pre.c:4411

2014-08-15 Thread jason at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62071 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- On 08/14/2014 07:13 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >> On 08/14/2014 02:10 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote: >>> I wonder what we should do with both external and comdat here. Jason, can >>> we devirtualize? >> >> No, we're se

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #45 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Aug 15 17:27:58 2014 New Revision: 214030 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214030&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/62077 gcc/ * tree.c (type_hash_canon): Uncomment ass

[Bug target/56997] Incorrect write to packed field when strict-volatile-bitfields enabled on aarch32

2014-08-15 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997 --- Comment #17 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #16) > This testcase fails on aarch64 when SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is true. hmm, yes. there are targets that define SLOW_UNALIGNED_ACCESS=1, but they also define STRI

[Bug c++/57466] [DR 1584] Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is function type

2014-08-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libstdc++/57465] Failed postcondition for std::function constructed with null function pointer

2014-08-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57465 Bug 57465 depends on bug 57466, which changed state. Bug 57466 Summary: [DR 1584] Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is function type https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466 What|Removed

[Bug c++/62072] [5 regression] No SFINAE performed for function type

2014-08-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62072 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62072] [5 regression] No SFINAE performed for function type

2014-08-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62072 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Aug 15 16:23:47 2014 New Revision: 214027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214027&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-08-15 Paolo Carlini PR c++/62072 Revert:

[Bug c++/57466] [DR 1584] Argument deduction fails for 'const T*' when T is function type

2014-08-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466 --- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Aug 15 16:23:47 2014 New Revision: 214027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214027&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-08-15 Paolo Carlini PR c++/62072 Revert:

[Bug libstdc++/62159] Missing headers for freestanding implementation

2014-08-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62159 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Note that probably also made a latent issue pop up. Indeed. After preliminary investigation, I think this case reveals two latent issues. The first

[Bug c++/62072] [5 regression] No SFINAE performed for function type

2014-08-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62072 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/62154] std::throw_with_nested should not require a polymorphic type

2014-08-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62154 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/62159] New: Missing headers for freestanding implementation

2014-08-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62159 Bug ID: 62159 Summary: Missing headers for freestanding implementation Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lib

[Bug libstdc++/62154] std::throw_with_nested should not require a polymorphic type

2014-08-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62154 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Aug 15 15:22:44 2014 New Revision: 214025 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214025&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/62154 * libsupc++/nested_exception.h (throw_with_nes

[Bug fortran/44054] Handle -Werror, -Werror=, -fdiagnostics-show-option, !GCC$ diagnostic (pragmas) and color

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Author: manu Date: Fri Aug 15 15:10:15 2014 New Revision: 214024 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214024&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-15 Manuel López-Ibáñez PR fortran/44054 gcc/ * d

[Bug libstdc++/62154] std::throw_with_nested should not require a polymorphic type

2014-08-15 Thread vlovich at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62154 Vitali changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vlovich at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Vi

[Bug tree-optimization/59859] [meta-bug] GRAPHITE issues

2014-08-15 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59859 Bug 59859 depends on bug 57732, which changed state. Bug 57732 Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segfault in libisl) building drizzle on 32bit targets (at least arm-linux and i586-linux) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57732

[Bug tree-optimization/57732] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segfault in libisl) building drizzle on 32bit targets (at least arm-linux and i586-linux)

2014-08-15 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57732 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/62158] New: FAIL: scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gimple_assign"

2014-08-15 Thread sabrinadfs at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62158 Bug ID: 62158 Summary: FAIL: scan-tree-dump-not optimized "gimple_assign" Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug sanitizer/62157] New: make distclean error when libsanitizer is configured not to build 'tsan'

2014-08-15 Thread Explorer09 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62157 Bug ID: 62157 Summary: make distclean error when libsanitizer is configured not to build 'tsan' Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/62129] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constant, at varasm.c:4755

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62129 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/62123] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand with option -std=c++11 and using std::complex

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62123 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61994] [4.9 Regression] constexpr vector array ICE

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61994 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paul.freitag@bruker-biospin

[Bug target/62123] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: output_operand: invalid expression as operand with option -std=c++11 and using std::complex

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62123 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

2014-08-15 Thread y.gribov at samsung dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 Yury Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/59002] [meta-bug] Access checking in templates

2014-08-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59002 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62072] [5 regression] No SFINAE performed for function type

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.2 |5.0 Summary|[4.9/5 regression

[Bug c++/62072] [4.9/5 regression] No SFINAE performed for function type

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c/44077] -Wtype-limits fails to warn for _Bool comparisons

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44077 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/61878] Missing intrinsic functions in avx512intrin.h

2014-08-15 Thread tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61878 --- Comment #2 from tocarip at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tocarip Date: Fri Aug 15 12:47:41 2014 New Revision: 214019 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214019&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/61878 * config/i386/avx512fintri

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug middle-end/62078] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 2 with -fdelete-dead-exceptions

2014-08-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62078 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/62078] [5 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 2 with -fdelete-dead-exceptions

2014-08-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62078 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #44 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Sven C. Dack from comment #43) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #42) > > (In reply to Sven C. Dack from comment #40) > > > The results are the averages (and deviations) of 5

[Bug tree-optimization/62156] New: memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time

2014-08-15 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62156 Bug ID: 62156 Summary: memcmp doesn't see through memcpy at compile-time Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread sven.c.dack at virginmedia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #43 from Sven C. Dack --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #42) > (In reply to Sven C. Dack from comment #40) > > The results are the averages (and deviations) of 5 runs with each compiler: > > > > avg

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

2014-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Sure, both FEs should have it.

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Sounds good. I'll look at it, so mine for now. But the > -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare name is too long - can't we > name it just e.g. -Wbo

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #42 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Sven C. Dack from comment #40) > The results are the averages (and deviations) of 5 runs with each compiler: > > avg stdev % > default:282.86s0.

[Bug lto/62032] FAIL: vsnprintf-chk.c execution, -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none

2014-08-15 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62032 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|4.9.1 | Known to fail|4.10.0

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

2014-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #41 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, sven.c.dack at virginmedia dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 > > --- Comment #40 from Sven C. Dack --- > I ran benchmarks and got some unu

[Bug fortran/62131] [4.9/5 Regression] OpenMP: Subobject of an allocatable array not allowed in OMP ATOMIC

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62131 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 15 10:24:08 2014 New Revision: 214011 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214011&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/62131 * openmp.c (resolve_omp_atomic): Only complain if

[Bug fortran/62131] [4.9/5 Regression] OpenMP: Subobject of an allocatable array not allowed in OMP ATOMIC

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62131 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 15 10:23:13 2014 New Revision: 214010 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214010&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/62131 * openmp.c (resolve_omp_atomic): Only complain if

[Bug bootstrap/62077] --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto fails

2014-08-15 Thread sven.c.dack at virginmedia dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62077 --- Comment #40 from Sven C. Dack --- I ran benchmarks and got some unusual results. Or perhaps it is a regression? I have created 4 versions of gcc and used these to timed the time it takes to compile a linux kernel. The configuration of the 4

[Bug libstdc++/62154] std::throw_with_nested should not require a polymorphic type

2014-08-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62154 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/62140] [GCC-4.10.0][ASAN] ICE: : in build2_stat, at tree.c:4265

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug inline-asm/62144] "Frame pointer required, but reserved" error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62155] New: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12544

2014-08-15 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155 Bug ID: 62155 Summary: ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12544 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Note that probably also made a latent issue pop up.

[Bug libstdc++/62154] New: std::throw_with_nested should not require a polymorphic type

2014-08-15 Thread jaak at ristioja dot ee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62154 Bug ID: 62154 Summary: std::throw_with_nested should not require a polymorphic type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/62153] warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 --- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- This should be enabled in GCC bootstrap: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg01555.html

[Bug c++/62153] New: warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1

2014-08-15 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62153 Bug ID: 62153 Summary: warn for bool expression compared with integer different from 0/1 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons

2014-08-15 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug tree-optimization/62114] [graphite] ICE using -floop-parallelize-all and -ffast-math

2014-08-15 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
fail||4.8.3 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose --- this test case fails on the 4.8 and 4.9 branches, but succeeds with trunk 20140815. $ cat tst.c int a, b; fn1() { for (; a; a++) b |= 1; } $ gcc -c -Ofast -floop-parallelize-all tst.c tst.c: In function 

[Bug ipa/61800] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault during Firefox build

2014-08-15 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61800 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

2014-08-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I also get an ICE for X = ceiling(X) and X = aint(X) but not if I replace floor with sin or real.

[Bug fortran/62142] [4.9/5 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (X = X - L*floor(X/L))

2014-08-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62142 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 6 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6&action=edit patch Like this - does it help the particular case? Note that one issue is that points-to doesn't track NULL-

[Bug c++/62101] deleted definitions of friend functions are rejected

2014-08-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62101 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread amker at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/13962] [tree-ssa] make "fold" use alias information to optimize pointer comparisons

2014-08-15 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13962 > > --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse --- > While looking at some unrelated issue, I noti

[Bug tree-optimization/62031] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Different results between O2 and O2 -fpredictive-commoning

2014-08-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Aug 15 07:50:40 2014 New Revision: 214006 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214006&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-08-15 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/62031 * tree

[Bug fortran/62107] libgomp.fortran/target2.f90 error while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62107 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/62092] libgomp.c++/target-2.C FAIL while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62092 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jakub at red

[Bug rtl-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Seems like with -fno-move-loop-invariants even gcc 4.9 miscompiles this.

[Bug fortran/62107] libgomp.fortran/target2.f90 error while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62107 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 15 07:41:29 2014 New Revision: 214004 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214004&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/62107 * trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_finish_clause): Handle

[Bug fortran/62107] libgomp.fortran/target2.f90 error while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62107 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 15 07:41:06 2014 New Revision: 214003 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214003&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/62107 * trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_finish_clause): Handle

[Bug middle-end/62092] libgomp.c++/target-2.C FAIL while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62092 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 15 07:40:37 2014 New Revision: 214002 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214002&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/62092 * gimplify.c (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1):

[Bug middle-end/62092] libgomp.c++/target-2.C FAIL while compiling for OpenMP 4.0 offload target

2014-08-15 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62092 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Aug 15 07:40:03 2014 New Revision: 214001 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214001&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/62092 * gimplify.c (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1):

[Bug tree-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug tree-optimization/62151] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

2014-08-15 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62151 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/62152] New: ICE caused by using __builtin_ia32_pause() inside C++11 noexcept functions on Windows

2014-08-15 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62152 Bug ID: 62152 Summary: ICE caused by using __builtin_ia32_pause() inside C++11 noexcept functions on Windows Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev