https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
--- Comment #50 from Roland Schulz ---
I must say I don't know how the internals work. But I assume that reductions
are implemented in libgomp (I know they are in iomp). Thus for any code which
uses OpenMP reduce statements, libgomp would touch u
/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.10.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140708 (experimental) [trunk revision 212357
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61544
--- Comment #3 from zqchen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: zqchen
Date: Wed Jul 9 05:27:16 2014
New Revision: 212385
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212385&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r211775 from trunk.
2014-06-18 Terry Guo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61679
--- Comment #8 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tbsaunde
Date: Wed Jul 9 03:07:09 2014
New Revision: 212384
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
playcate old gcc
gcc/
PR bootstrap/61679
* hash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61599
--- Comment #1 from tmsriram at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: tmsriram
Date: Wed Jul 9 00:50:25 2014
New Revision: 212380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Sriraman Tallam
PR target/61599
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61753
--- Comment #4 from shapero at uw dot edu ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> I don't know how you got that to compile with GCC 4.6.3 as every version I
> have rejects it - not a regression.
>
> (The upstream code on github has be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61382
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61308
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
It would be great to accompany these fixes with regression tests. We have
significant amount of Go code in std lib and tests, but still we discover new
code patterns. Any new compiler functionality (like race
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61308
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jul 8 21:28:17 2014
New Revision: 212372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61308
compiler: Convert array start index before bounds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61746
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61746
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jul 8 20:49:38 2014
New Revision: 212370
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61746
compiler: Fix C-style comment parsing.
The compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61746
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Jul 8 20:49:59 2014
New Revision: 212371
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212371&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/61746
compiler: Fix C-style comment parsing.
The compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58883
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61459
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58883
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 8 19:51:04 2014
New Revision: 212369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/61459
PR fortran/58883
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61459
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Tue Jul 8 19:51:04 2014
New Revision: 212369
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/61459
PR fortran/58883
* t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61755
Bug ID: 61755
Summary: Reference to function is parsed as const reference to
function in debug info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61754
Bug ID: 61754
Summary: [C++1y] [[deprecated]] attribute warns annoyingly
compared to __attribute__((deprecated))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61753
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7.2 regression] |poor diagnostic for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61746
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61753
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61751
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||perso...@e-maxx.ru
--- Comment #12 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61751
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Looks like a dup of PR 60367
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61753
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61753
Bug ID: 61753
Summary: [4.7.2 regression] prototype for function does not
match any in class error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61752
--- Comment #1 from jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk ---
Created attachment 33092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33092&action=edit
Patch to cygming-crtbegin.c to prevent libgcc pinning itself in memory
This seems to be cau
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61752
Bug ID: 61752
Summary: on cygwin, aborts during exit() with a dynamically
loaded C++ library
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61751
Bug ID: 61751
Summary: Empty brace-initializer causes double destruction of
unique_ptr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61673
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
;; ??? For !flag_finite_math_only, the representation with SMIN/SMAX
;; isn't really correct, as those rtl operators aren't defined when
;; applied to NaNs. Hopefully the optimizers won't get too smart on u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61673
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 8 15:43:39 2014
New Revision: 212365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212365&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/61673
* combine.c (simplify_comparison): Test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61673
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 8 15:39:36 2014
New Revision: 212364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/61673
* combine.c (simplify_comparison): Test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61750
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente ---
confirm that
-ffinite-math-only -fno-signed-zeros
is equivalent to Ofast in this case
so we conclude that the code generated at O2 is wrong and
-ffinite-math-only -fno-signed-zeros
is required to trigger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61750
Bug ID: 61750
Summary: Compiling gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90 with
-O3 -fwhole-program gives an ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to vincenzo Innocente from comment #2)
> > I think you need -fno-signed-zeros for the transformation to be valid.
> possible.
> but then is the O2 code that is wrong?
> in any case adding -fno-signed-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente ---
> I think you need -fno-signed-zeros for the transformation to be valid.
possible.
but then is the O2 code that is wrong?
in any case adding -fno-signed-zeros makes no difference w/r/t O2 alone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
I think you need -fno-signed-zeros for the transformation to be valid.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64*
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749
Bug ID: 61749
Summary: arm_neon.h "_lane" and "_n" intrinsics can cause ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61739
--- Comment #4 from Rich Felker ---
Sorry, that should be:
printf("");
printf("%d\n", fwide(stdout, 0));
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61739
Rich Felker changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
--- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33090
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33090&action=edit
Dump file of einline pass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61748
Bug ID: 61748
Summary: imm-devirt-2.C failed on arm-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
Rohit changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rohitarulraj at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61747
Bug ID: 61747
Summary: min,max pattern not always properly optimized (for
sse4 targets)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61745
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Clang and EDG behave the same as G++ for this code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61746
Bug ID: 61746
Summary: A line starting with /*// causes an error even if the
/* is closed on the next line
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Ok. I will add it.
2014-07-08 14:45 GMT+04:00 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org :
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
>
> --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Indeed, it is. Can you add the te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61745
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This seems to be what the standard requires, why do you think it's a bug?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> So perhaps teach fold also about A CMP B ? A - B : -(A - B) etc.?
Or teach phiopt about A CMP B ? (U)((T)A - (T)B) : (U)((T)B - (T)A)? Hmm, it is
starting to be a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
We have
patt_24 = DOT_PROD_EXPR <_12, _12, prephitmp_48>;
and
_12 = _11 >> 2;
is not STMT_VINFO_IN_PATTERN_P but it doesn't have a vec_stmt yet even
though it is there:
vect__12.29_90 = vect__11.27_87
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61681
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 8 11:05:13 2014
New Revision: 212357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61680
* tre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61681
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 8 11:05:13 2014
New Revision: 212357
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212357&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61680
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Indeed, it is. Can you add the testcase from this PR to trunk? Then we can
close it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61745
Bug ID: 61745
Summary: template friend for dyadic operator- is only accepted
if the monadic operator- follows it
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
This is duplicate of PR 61576 and it should pass after r212347.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59843
--- Comment #6 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Tue Jul 8 10:32:57 2014
New Revision: 212355
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r211502: PR target/59843 Fix arm_neon.h ZIP/UZP/T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61744
Bug ID: 61744
Summary: misleading documentation about cast of extended
vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, I wouldn't change fold_cond_expr_with_comparison itself.
Instead, next to the two spots that call fold_cond_expr_with_comparison add
another two, which would if arg1 or op2 is a MINUS_EXPR where the fir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61725
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 8 09:42:44 2014
New Revision: 212354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212354&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61725
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_basic): Don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61725
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 8 09:39:57 2014
New Revision: 212353
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212353&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61725
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_basic): Don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61739
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45289
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61741
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61681
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 8 09:04:29 2014
New Revision: 212349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61681
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53585
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61680
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 8 08:59:17 2014
New Revision: 212348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-07-08 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/61680
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 33088
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33088&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Use '-O3 -funroll-loops -Dbtype=[int,e_u8]' to reproduce.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61743
Bug ID: 61743
Summary: Complete unroll is not happened for loops with short
upper bound
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61190
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61576
--- Comment #6 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Tue Jul 8 07:52:12 2014
New Revision: 212347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=212347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61576
gcc/
* tree-if-conv.c (is_cond_scalar_re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61739
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Since printf("") does not need to obtain ownership of stdout there is no
conflict here. There is no requirement that it *must* obtain ownership even if
not needed.
85 matches
Mail list logo
