https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538
--- Comment #11 from Joshua Kinard ---
I also have another test case from glibc itself, where when compiling
glibc-2.19 w/ gcc-4.8.x or greater, at the end, it creates a statically-linked
version of 'ln' as 'sln', and tries to run that. That bin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61538
--- Comment #10 from Joshua Kinard ---
I rebuilt both glibc-2.19 and gcc-4.8.3 w/ debugging, though gcc's build system
managed to strip out or optimize away some of the debugging code. That said,
it's enough to see that the hang is being trigger
version 4.10.0 20140620 (experimental) [trunk revision 211848] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; a.out
0
$ gcc-4.9.0 -O3 small.c; a.out
0
$
$ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c; a.out
1
$
int printf (const char *, ...);
volatile int a, b;
int c, d, e, f;
static int
fn1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59051
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575
--- Comment #1 from Paul Pluzhnikov ---
Sorry, cut/paste error. Both
gcc-svn-4_9-r211828/bin/gcc
gcc-svn-4_9-r211175/bin/gcc
fails the same way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61575
Bug ID: 61575
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bogus invalid initialization of
reference of type 'const D&' from expression of type
''
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37634
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61565
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson ---
Patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg01637.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33363
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33363
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Jun 20 20:11:30 2014
New Revision: 211858
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211858&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/33363
* invoke.texi: Don't mention nonexi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61574
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is deconstructors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61568
--- Comment #2 from Melissa ---
(In reply to Harald van Dijk from comment #1)
> The C++ standard requires an unscoped enumeration type with an underlying
> type that is not fixed to promote to signed int, if signed int is capable of
> representin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61556
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 20 18:34:37 2014
New Revision: 211855
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211855&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61556
* call.c (build_over_call): Call build_this in templa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 20 18:35:19 2014
New Revision: 211856
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211856&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59296
* call.c (add_function_candidate): Avoid special 'thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60265
Paul Pluzhnikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppluzhnikov at google dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59296
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 20 18:32:35 2014
New Revision: 211854
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211854&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59296
* call.c (add_function_candidate): Avoid special 'thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61556
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 20 18:31:53 2014
New Revision: 211853
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211853&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61556
* call.c (build_over_call): Call build_this in templa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61574
Bug ID: 61574
Summary: Confusing .debug_line generation by -g option
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61568
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121
--- Comment #7 from Jim Michaels ---
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd405485%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms679351%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/win
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121
Jim Michaels changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-ftree-parallelize-loops=n |-O2
|(n as value) not a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61121
Jim Michaels changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61510
--- Comment #4 from jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Obviously something simple like this will fix the problem, but I don't know the
area to say that it doesn't just mask a deeper bug.
Honza?
---
2014-06-19 James Greenhalgh
* cgraphu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61407
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61554
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61572
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
--- Comment #7 from venture37 at gmail dot com ---
This is on 32bit PowerPC 7450 system
Darwin 8.11.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.0: Wed Oct 10 18:26:00 PDT 2007;
root:xnu-792.24.17~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52482
venture37 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||venture37 at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61540
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61540
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 20 11:26:42 2014
New Revision: 211848
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211848&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-20 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61540
* ipa-prop.c (impossib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61540
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 20 11:19:46 2014
New Revision: 211847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-20 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61540
* ipa-prop.c (impossib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61530
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Jun 20 10:26:55 2014
New Revision: 211846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-18 Yury Gribov
gcc/
PR sanitizer/61530
* asan.c (b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 20 09:57:53 2014
New Revision: 211845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-20 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61211
* cgraph.c (clone_of_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61211
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jun 20 09:54:39 2014
New Revision: 211844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-20 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/61211
* cgraph.c (clone_of_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, but for this model AFAIK we go through the default: case of PENTIUMPRO
anyway, where we only test the flags, so even if it used some completely
unknown family number, it would still behave the same.
So,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Well, qemu seems confused (as usual). Having "lm" and "lahf_lm"in the CPUID
feature flags and a 48-bit virtual address space implies being 64-bit, but
Intel Family 6 Model 13 implies being the 32-bit onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
fndecl deletion place:
Old value = (tree) 0x76d4a700
New value = (tree) 0xa5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5
memset () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/memset.S:90
90../sysdeps/x86_64/memset.S: No such file or directory.
(gdb) bt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2014-6-20
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61573
Bug ID: 61573
Summary: [ICE] Segfault while Linux 3.15 build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard.guenther at gmail dot
com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61572
Bug ID: 61572
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at
lra-assigns.c:1335
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571
--- Comment #1 from davidxl ---
Created attachment 32979
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32979&action=edit
source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61571
Bug ID: 61571
Summary: bad aliasing --> wrong FRE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61570
Bug ID: 61570
Summary: -march=native CPU you selected does not support x86-64
instruction under QEMU
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
50 matches
Mail list logo
