https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61493
--- Comment #1 from wmi at google dot com ---
Created attachment 32931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32931&action=edit
testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61493
Bug ID: 61493
Summary: Bug exposed by speculative devirtualizing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #39 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #38 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> I've just wrote a patch that solve a bug that can lead to the kind of issue
> you
> are running into. I'm doing more testing rig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61320
--- Comment #38 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've just wrote a patch that solve a bug that can lead to the kind of issue you
are running into. I'm doing more testing right now and will let you know when
it's commited if you don't mind tryi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61492
--- Comment #1 from David Krauss ---
Oops, objects hide enumerations in this context too.
enum e { m } e = e::m; // Same error
I neglected to check this because I thought I'd used it a while ago, but it
turns out I'd worked around the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61492
Bug ID: 61492
Summary: Nested-name-specifier lookup finds function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61375
--- Comment #1 from thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Fri Jun 13 03:17:02 2014
New Revision: 211604
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-06-13 Thomas Preud'homme
gcc/
PR tree-opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61491
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
This is part of DR1206:
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1206
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60731
--- Comment #11 from Dave Johansen ---
Can this please be reopened? It was determined in the glibc bugzilla that this
is a gcc problem because of the incorrect setting of unique flag.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61491
Bug ID: 61491
Summary: An explicit specialization of a member enumeration of
a class template is rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61481
--- Comment #3 from Craig Schroeder ---
Created attachment 32930
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32930&action=edit
More practical (but more complex) example
I am trying to optimize an auto-differentiation utility. The examp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61423
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I expect the REE bug to be fixed tomorrow AM (my time). It's a trivial issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61486
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 12 21:14:15 2014
New Revision: 211597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211597&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61486
* gimplify.c (struct gimplify_omp_ctx): Add dis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61486
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jun 12 21:10:11 2014
New Revision: 211596
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211596&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61486
* gimplify.c (struct gimplify_omp_ctx): Add dis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60997
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Also, the compiler really isn't allowed to interchange the !$OMP DO loop
(outermost) with the inner ones, it has different semantics because of the
markup. The compiler could still interchange the inner two
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61482
Trevor Saunders changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tsaunders at mozilla dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60670
jacknagel at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jacknagel at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60997
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is not possible.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Deniz Bahadir from comment #0)
> When compiling the following code (in C++11 mode) with
> -Wmissing-field-initializers then almost all attempts to initialize
> "sockaddr_in" result in compiler-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61009
--- Comment #19 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jun 12 18:38:29 2014
New Revision: 211589
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211589&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61009
* tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_thro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61289
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jun 12 18:38:20 2014
New Revision: 211588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211588&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backports from mainline:
PR tree-optimization/61289
* tree-ssa-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61289
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60997
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61000
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This causes compilation of AVX code using GCC 4.9 to fail on OS X Mavericks;
> ...
Exactly why I have opened pr61168!-(still not fixed).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61168
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
m8r-540gv7 at mailinator dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m8r-540gv7 at mailinato
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19820
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61009
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jun 12 17:12:18 2014
New Revision: 211586
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/61009
* tree-ssa-threadedge.c (thread_thro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56726
--- Comment #8 from Chip Salzenberg ---
Further research says that the alignment of a malloc(N) will be >= N if there
is a basic type that requires alignment N. So we may be able to ramp this up
quite a bit.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831
--- Comment #24 from Chip Salzenberg ---
In 4.8.2 (Ubuntu trusty), the copy is finally elided. Good job! But stack
space is still allocated for the copy that is not made. So it's not all fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61490
Bug ID: 61490
Summary: accepts-invalid: qualified-name in friend function
definition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487
--- Comment #2 from Rose Garcia ---
maybe related (fails also only on mips with -flto)
libpcap 1.3.0 (compiled WITH -fPIC)
http://www.tcpdump.org/release/libpcap-1.3.0.tar.gz
mips-linux-musl-gcc -L/media/3T/x-prefix/mips/lib -isystem
/media/3T/x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
--- Comment #1 from Deniz Bahadir ---
This does not only occur with GCC 4.9.0 but also with older ones like 4.7 and
4.8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61489
Bug ID: 61489
Summary: Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61488
Bug ID: 61488
Summary: Regression in template argument substitution in 4.9+
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487
--- Comment #1 from Rose Garcia ---
i forgot to add that the same works fine with exactly the same toolchain built
for armv7l.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61487
Bug ID: 61487
Summary: LTO breaks on mips with wireless-tools 0.29
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Great - thanks for confirming it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55033
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61485
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61485
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Scharrer ---
Yes, after your fix everything works with Clang.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61486
Bug ID: 61486
Summary: ICE with #pragma omp teams
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61485
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61485
--- Comment #3 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Why would you do autoreconf?
With most projects, this is needed with svn working copies, otherwise some
files may become obsolete and one gets weird errors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24012
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.10.0
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #18 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61485
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre ---
Sorry, bad copy-paste of a command. The problem can still be reproduced:
$ autoreconf2.64 -i
$ mkdir gcc-build
$ cd gcc-build
$ ../configure --enable-maintainer-mode
$ touch Makefile.in
$ make
[...]
make[3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57503
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #10 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15212
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #46 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26241
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32306
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #25 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #24 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61485
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Why would you do autoreconf?
The supported way of doing this is to put the exact versions in your PATH.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56442
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56446
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57042
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59367
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57333
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53113
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #25 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58670
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59637
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53135
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |---
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57967
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.5 |---
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #14 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25208
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #18 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #11 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #25 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #24 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61014
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #17 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #55 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #25 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #12 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #18 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23144
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #16 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #28 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #56 from Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38059
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biene
1 - 100 of 342 matches
Mail list logo