https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61282
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Why do you think this is a bug? C rules about alignment apply here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61282
--- Comment #1 from V. Pimenov ---
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 20121015 (Red Hat 4.7.2-5)
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61282
Bug ID: 61282
Summary: vectorisation causes segfaults in a compiled program
during access to an int-casted char[] after bool in a
struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu May 22 05:38:04 2014
New Revision: 210740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210740&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/61012
* lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_1): Do not ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu May 22 05:35:32 2014
New Revision: 210739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210739&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/61012
* lto-symtab.c (lto_symtab_merge_decls_1):
Modified:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61281
Bug ID: 61281
Summary: Memory corruption on assigning a polymorphic variable
to a non-polymorphic one
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61280
Bug ID: 61280
Summary: GCC 4.8.2 suppresses -Wsign-compare caused by macro
defined in system header
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60324
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu May 22 03:51:25 2014
New Revision: 210738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210738&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 60324 Handle long path names, don't use PATH_MAX.
Modified:
trunk/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
Bug ID: 61279
Summary: [4.10 Regression] ICE in loop_preheader_edge, at
cfgloop.c:1668 w/ -O1 -ftree-loop-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.10.0 20140521 (experimental) [trunk revision 210675] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-4.9.0 -flto -O0 -c foo.c
$ gcc-4.9.0 -flto -O1 -c main.c
$ gcc-4.9.0 -flto -O1 foo.o main.o
$ a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c foo.c
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c main.c
$ gcc-trunk -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61277
Bug ID: 61277
Summary: Incorrect -Warray-bounds warning with 4.9.0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
--- Comment #9 from Sandra Loosemore ---
I've been looking at this a little bit more.
DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM is specifically documented to take a hard register number as
its operand, so the assertion in dwf_regno is at least consistent with that.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60820
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
Jouko Orava changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jouko.orava at iki dot fi
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
>
> Instead of building GCC with --disable-shared, why not just use
> -static-libstdc++ when linking?
It was a long time ago that I last tried that, so I ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61202
--- Comment #4 from carrot at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: carrot
Date: Wed May 21 20:46:46 2014
New Revision: 210728
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210728&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/61202
* config/aarch64/arm_neon.h (vqdmulh_n_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think the right fix is
--- a/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/configure.ac
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ if test "$enable_shared" = yes; then
glibcxx_compiler_pic_flag="$lt_prog_compiler_pic_CXX"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61215
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Subreg functions in simplify_subreg transform (subreg:hi (plus:si argp 8)) into
(plus:hi (subreg:hi argp) 8). I'll investigate how to avoid this transformation
as LRA works fine if transformation is not do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61143
--- Comment #12 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Wed May 21 19:51:05 2014
New Revision: 210726
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210726&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-21 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/61143
* include/bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed May 21 19:07:30 2014
New Revision: 210723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210723&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/61272
* ubsan.c (is_ubsan_builtin_p): Turn assert i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed May 21 18:54:12 2014
New Revision: 210722
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210722&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/61212
* files.c (find_file_in_dir): Add parens around &&.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61212
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53097
Shachar Shemesh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shachar at shemesh dot biz
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
You could suggest GCC diagnostic issues to
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/programs/core-infrastructure-initiative if
you wish
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61133
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 21 17:23:07 2014
New Revision: 210720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210720&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/61133
* lambda.c (build_capture_proxy, add_capture): Treat n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #5 from Jonatha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61012
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is LTO-symtab bug. In this case we have chain with static var and external
decl and we find no prevailing symbol (correctly), but then instead of choosing
the external decl for further merging we go with st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On May 21, 2014 5:14:27 PM CEST, eggert at gnu dot org
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
>
>--- Comment #18 from Paul Eggert ---
>(In reply to Richard Biener from commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #2)
> It would also find an unknown number of bugs in Linux kernel,
> which compiles with gcc only, sadly.
Which I find sad is that GCC does not have such a si
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Just to mention that I cloned PR 61271 to not forget about implementing the
warning once the problematic code is fixed. So this PR should be about
implementing the warning, rather than fixing any partic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #0)
> GCC should have this warning which would have detected several obvious bugs
> in GCC itself.
And at least 60 bugs in Fedora Linux, based on compiling
Fed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61276
Bug ID: 61276
Summary: warn about possible coding errors with logical not (!)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61275
Bug ID: 61275
Summary: Invalid initialization expression for ALLOCATABLE
component in structure constructor at (1)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16063
--- Comment #7 from Mark Wielaard ---
Author: mark
Date: Wed May 21 15:44:59 2014
New Revision: 210717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210717&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/16063. Add DW_AT_type to DW_TAG_enumeration.
Add a new lang-hook t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61249
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Michael Tautschnig from comment #2)
> Thanks a lot for your quick reply.
>
> > > Yet r205495 changed _mm_frcz_ss/_mm_frcz_sd so that only a single argument
> > > is passed to the __builtin_ia32_vf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
I think easiest would be
--- a/gcc/ubsan.c
+++ b/gcc/ubsan.c
@@ -531,9 +538,9 @@ ubsan_instrument_unreachable (location_t loc)
bool
is_ubsan_builtin_p (tree t)
{
- gcc_checking_assert (TREE_CODE (t) == F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61274
Bug ID: 61274
Summary: excessive code size with large-unit-insns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #9)
> So, what's happening here on the testcase is that before r210519, from the
> ira dump for pseudo reg 171 we have
>
> a15 (r171,l0) best GENERAL_REGS, allocno GE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #18 from Paul Eggert ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> void foo (int *p)
> {
> int *q = realloc (p, sizeof (int));
> *q = 2;
> }
>
> may I remove the store *q = 2 as dead?
Yes, the consensus nowadays is that y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed May 21 15:09:37 2014
New Revision: 210715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210715&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/61269
* include/std/type_traits: Move include outside
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
--- Comment #5 from Jacob Abel ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> Slightly reduced test
>
> MODULE modu
>
> IMPLICIT NONE
>
> TYPE element
> CLASS(*), ALLOCATABLE :: e
> END TYPE element
>
> END MODULE modu
>
> PROGRAM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61273
Bug ID: 61273
Summary: gccgo: ICE in
Unsafe_type_conversion_expression::do_get_backend
[GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60179
--- Comment #8 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: sandra
Date: Wed May 21 14:45:36 2014
New Revision: 210714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-21 Cesar Philippidis
Sandra Loosemore
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> 3.
>
> ../../src/trunk/gcc/cp/cp-array-notation.c:1420:7: warning: logical not is
> only applied to the left hand side of this comparison
> [-Wlogical-not-pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61272
Bug ID: 61272
Summary: [UBSAN] ICE in is_ubsan_builtin_p(tree_node*),
gcc/ubsan.c:534
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
Even more:
7.
src/trunk/gcc/lra-spills.c:240:9: warning: logical not is only applied to the
left hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
Source code is
|| !FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #17 from Dan Gohman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16)
> One reason for why realloc is "hard" is that there is no language that says
> it is undefined to access the object via the old pointer, but there is only
> langua
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206
gcc at rkeene dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.1 |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Some more:
4.
trunk/gcc/expr.c:10660:10: warning: logical not is only applied to the left
hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
Source code
|| !exact_log2 (tree_to_uhwi (TREE_OP
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
I just compiled gcc trunk 20140521 with boot compiler clang++ -g -O2 -Wall
and it said
1.
../../src/trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1182:8: warning: logical not is only applied
to the left hand side of this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54482
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61270
Bug ID: 61270
Summary: max-inline-insns-single is too high
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
One reason for why realloc is "hard" is that there is no language that says
it is undefined to access the object via the old pointer, but there is only
language that says the old and the new pointer values
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61269
Bug ID: 61269
Summary: includes inside std namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed May 21 12:49:24 2014
New Revision: 210698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Previous change (rev 210697) should have mentioned PR ada/9535:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57625
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.1 |4.7.2
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61268
Bug ID: 61268
Summary: [4.10 regression] ICE in vt_expand_var_loc_chain, at
var-tracking.c:8262
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56244
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wbrana at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from wbr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56955
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61262
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60793
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61267
Bug ID: 61267
Summary: [MIPS] -march=mips32 does not always disable the use
of branch likely instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
I meant:
void f()
{
typedef void (*X) ();
X x[] = { [x](){} }; // { dg-error "incomplete" }
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
As testcase, this can do, I think:
void f()
{
typedef void (X) ();
X x[] = { [x](){} }; // { dg-error "incomplete" }
}
something even closer to the original one is of course welcome.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58638
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Daniel Richard G. from comment #0)
> I built GCC 4.8.1 with "--disable-shared --with-pic" so that I can
> statically link libgcc/libstdc++ into executables,
Instead of building GCC with --disa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61088
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61266
Bug ID: 61266
Summary: [4.10 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/Wstrict-overflow-18.c
(test for bogus messages, line 20)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61265
Bug ID: 61265
Summary: gccgo: ICE in verify_gimple_in_seq [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61184
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
This breaks gcc.dg/Wstrict-overflow-18.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
Wellamjames changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||feritzpowell at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61210
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61261
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61264
Bug ID: 61264
Summary: gccgo: ICE in __normal_iterator [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61252
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 21 08:06:04 2014
New Revision: 210681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61252
* omp-low.c (handle_simd_reference): New functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed May 21 08:06:06 2014
New Revision: 210682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/54236
* config/sh/sh.md (*addc_r_1): Rename t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed May 21 08:05:42 2014
New Revision: 210680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210680&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/cp
PR c/60189
* parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61252
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 21 08:04:03 2014
New Revision: 210679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210679&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/61252
* omp-low.c (handle_simd_reference): New functi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60189
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed May 21 08:03:06 2014
New Revision: 210678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/cp
PR c/60189
* parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61262
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61231
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61263
Bug ID: 61263
Summary: gccgo: fatal error: schedule: holding locks [GoSmith]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
96 matches
Mail list logo
