[Bug tree-optimization/60971] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code when coercing unsigned char to bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60971 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Isn't the real problem here that we emitted the tail call because we thought the return type from "foo" was close enough to the return type from "bar" that no coercion was needed? In the .optimized dump we h

[Bug fortran/60810] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] list directed io from array results in end of file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60810] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] list directed io from array results in end of file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Apr 29 03:13:34 2014 New Revision: 209888 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209888&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-28 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/60810 * gfortran.dg/

[Bug fortran/60993] New: Trouble initializing double precision variable using boz literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993 Bug ID: 60993 Summary: Trouble initializing double precision variable using boz literals Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/60992] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12637

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60992 Bug ID: 60992 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:12637 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/60989] automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/60991] [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers __int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60991 --- Comment #1 from johnst...@inn-soft.com --- I don't really know GCC source code well enough to feel comfortable changing and testing this myself, but I suspect the problem lies with this code? gcc/config/avr/avr.c: avr_out_store_psi function: r

[Bug target/60991] New: [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers __int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60991 Bug ID: 60991 Summary: [avr] Stack corruption when using 24-bit integers __int24 or __memx pointers in large stack frame Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #9 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32700 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32700&action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.9.0, compiled by 4.9.0

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #8 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32699 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32699&action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.9.0, compiled by 4.8.2

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #7 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32698 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32698&action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.8.2, compiled by 4.9.0

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #6 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32697 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32697&action=edit ftime-report, preprocessed by 4.8.2, compiled by 4.8.2

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #5 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32696 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32696&action=edit Test file used

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #4 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- After a series of tests I'm pretty sure that it is not a problem of g++, but libstdc++. Let me explain why do I think so. First, I was not able to reduce real life case to reasonably small subset that

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/60990] New: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call, at ipa-prop.c:2796 with -O3 -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60990 Bug ID: 60990 Summary: [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in try_make_edge_direct_virtual_call, at ipa-prop.c:2796 with -O3 -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp Product: gcc Ve

[Bug c++/60986] Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60986] Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- 731 template 732 inline T & 733 vec::operator[] (unsigned ix) 734 { 735 gcc_checking_assert (ix < m_vecpfx.m_num); 736 return m_vecdata[ix]; 737 } 3153 gcc_checking_asser

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1 |powerpc-ibm-aix* Priority|P3

[Bug c++/60894] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Use of redundant struct keyword in virtual function prototype combined with using statement causes compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug tree-optimization/60989] automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug tree-optimization/60989] New: automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60989 Bug ID: 60989 Summary: automatic increase of global array for vectorization doesn't work due to flag_section_anchors==0 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/60988] New: "transparent_union" doesn't appear in the gcc manual index

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60988 Bug ID: 60988 Summary: "transparent_union" doesn't appear in the gcc manual index Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug libstdc++/60958] Initialization of arrays in tr1/regex ill-formed or with undefined behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60958 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/60987] libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/60987] New: libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987 Bug ID: 60987 Summary: libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/60987] libstdc++ header file tr1/regex causes clang++ compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60987 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/60986] Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 --- Comment #1 from physik3 at gmx dot net --- Created attachment 32694 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32694&action=edit file containing the code

[Bug middle-end/60092] posix_memalign not recognized to derive alias and alignment info

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60092 --- Comment #27 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 28 14:36:13 2014 New Revision: 209863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209863&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-28 Richard Biener PR middle-end/60092 * builtins.def

[Bug target/39501] -O -ffinite-math-only gets min(x,y) optimization wrong for soft-float on arm-*-gnueabi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/60957] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Bogus error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60957 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/60984] AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn --- I have been bootstrapping GCC trunk and 4.9 on AIX 7.1 without any failures.

[Bug c++/60978] -Wenum-compare warns too eagerly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 --- Comment #7 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Warns since forever (checked up to GCC 4.3.x), confirmed. Interesting. In my non-reduced test case, the warning is new with gcc-4.9.

[Bug tree-optimization/60902] [4.9 Regression] ffmpeg built with gcc 4.9 RC produces incorrect flac playback code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60902 --- Comment #34 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Apr 28 13:38:19 2014 New Revision: 209860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209860&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/60902 * tree-ssa-threadedge.c (record_tempo

[Bug c/60985] _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60985 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse

[Bug c++/60986] New: Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60986 Bug ID: 60986 Summary: Wrong handling of const variables in lambda functions Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug tree-optimization/60979] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:5544, w/ -O -ftree-loop-linear or -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Apr 28 13:13:50 2014 New Revision: 209859 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209859&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-28 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/60979 * graphi

[Bug c/60985] New: _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60985 Bug ID: 60985 Summary: _mm_blendv_pd requires the '-msse4.1' option to compile Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Pr

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Apr 28 12:42:54 2014 New Revision: 209858 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209858&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM/AArch64] Use signed chars in gcc.dg/pr60114.c. PR

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/59120] [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59120] [c++11] ICE with invalid template alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59120 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Apr 28 12:32:06 2014 New Revision: 209857 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209857&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-04-28 Paolo Carlini PR c++/59120 * parser.c

[Bug tree-optimization/60979] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:5544, w/ -O -ftree-loop-linear or -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- create_single_exit_edge uses make_forwarder_block which doesn't really do things in a way that works for incoming abnormal edges. I can fix it by constraining SCOP detection. Index: gcc/graphite-scop-detect

[Bug c++/51424] [C++11] G++ should diagnose self-delegating constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424 --- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen --- My 2 cents is to open a separate bug if we want diagnostics for the more elaborate self-delegating cases.

[Bug c++/51424] [C++11] G++ should diagnose self-delegating constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini --- I seem to remember that the reason why I didn't close it completely at the time is that we may want to extend the diagnostic to cover non-trivial cycles too... Opinions? Could also be a separate bug, that for

[Bug ipa/60965] [4.10 Regression] IPA: Devirtualization versus placement new

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60965 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0

[Bug driver/60968] [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 with -dumpspecs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60968 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/60929] [4.8/4.9 regression] ICE in get_ref_die_offset, at dwarf2out.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60929 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.10.0 Summary|[4.8/4.9/4.10

[Bug ipa/60973] Invalid propagation of a tail call in devirt pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Please send patches to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org and specify how you tested it "Bootstrapped and tested on ".

[Bug c++/60978] -Wenum-compare warns too eagerly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60978 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug rtl-optimization/60947] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Unable to handle kernel paging request (linux kernel 2.6.28.9) with gcc 4.9 release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60947 --- Comment #10 from YuFan --- After more tests, I figure out the issue is caused by the commit: SVN revision: r206552 | amker | 2014-01-11 17:33:39 +0800 (六, 11 1月 2014) | 7 lines * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (iv_ca_narrow): New parameter

[Bug tree-optimization/60979] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in gimple_redirect_edge_and_branch_force, at tree-cfg.c:5544, w/ -O -ftree-loop-linear or -fgraphite-identity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60979 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #4 from Yuriy Chernyshov --- Thanks, Richard and Jonathan (you both gave me the same solution). Hope, this helps. I'll post the results here, once I'll get them.

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- As a workaround you can configure with --disable-libstdcxx-pch (the generated PCHs are not too useful anyway).

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Instead use 'signed char' types please.

[Bug lto/58528] lto1: internal compiler error: in build_abbrev_table, at dwarf2out.c:7478

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58528 Viktor Ostashevskyi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ostash at ostash dot kiev.ua --- Co

[Bug bootstrap/60984] New: AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60984 Bug ID: 60984 Summary: AIX: gcc-4.9.0 bootstrap fails in stage-2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: bootstr

[Bug rtl-optimization/60866] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE: in get_seqno_for_a_jump, at sel-sched-ir.c:4068 with -fselective-scheduling -fno-if-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60866 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassign

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Thomas Sanchez from comment #4) > Anyway, I pushed the actual code in this branch: > https://github.com/daedric/httpp/tree/bug-promise-test > > I was able to do a small test that can *sometimes

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sanchez --- Last comment on myself: I got some errors relates to the promise with valgrind but they do not cause an hangs ==30999== Thread 2: ==30999== Invalid read of size 4 ==30999==at 0x4E44A91: pthread_once (pt

[Bug c/60983] Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sanchez --- With my previous mail, the link I added was because I wanted to ask that if you were not able to reproduce the problem I could use CARE to recreate the environment I'm running my test. With lambda replaced (

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #2 from Yuriy Chernyshov --- Memory usage is 0.1%. Building host has 32g of RAM.

[Bug libstdc++/60966] std::call_once sometime hangs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60966 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sanchez --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > > N.B. the std::move in Manager::cancelConnection is redundant, the return > > > value from cancel_connection is already an rvalue. > > > > Yes, I know, the

[Bug pch/60982] Very long compilation of precompiled headers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60982 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- How much RAM do you have? Is the machine swapping while running that command? How much memory is the cc1plus process using?

[Bug c/60983] New: Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60983 Bug ID: 60983 Summary: Fix for pr60114 introduced FAILs Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assi

[Bug c++/60980] [4.9/4.10 Regression] ICE in build_special_member_call, at cp/call.c:7447

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60980 --- Comment #4 from Paul Pluzhnikov --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Note I think this code is invalid due to the struct not having a size. Making the array non-empty makes no difference: struct x0 { x0 () = default; }; stru