[Bug c++/58407] [C++11] Should warn about deprecated implicit generation of copy constructor/assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58407 Alex Howlett changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alex at suncho dot com --- Comment #8 from

[Bug libfortran/52539] I/O: Wrong result for UTF-8/UCS-4 list-directed and namelist read and nml write

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Apr 26 21:56:48 2014 New Revision: 209829 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209829&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-26 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/52539 * gfortran.dg/n

[Bug libfortran/52539] I/O: Wrong result for UTF-8/UCS-4 list-directed and namelist read and nml write

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52539 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Apr 26 21:52:26 2014 New Revision: 209828 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209828&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-04-26 Jerry DeLisle PR libfortran/52539 * io/list_read.

[Bug c++/60955] Erroneous warning about taking address of register with std=c++1y

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60955 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Perhaps also this special case could also be removed by using TREE_NO_WARNING. diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.c b/gcc/cp/typeck.c index c91612c..d8374d9 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.c +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.c @@

[Bug c++/60955] Erroneous warning about taking address of register with std=c++1y

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60955 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/60955] Erroneous warning about taking address of register with std=c++1y

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60955 Harald van Dijk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment #

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #3 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32689 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32689&action=edit ftime-report for G++ 4.9.0

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #2 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32688 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32688&action=edit ftime-report for G++ 4.8.2

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #1 from Chernyshev Viacheslav --- Created attachment 32687 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32687&action=edit g++ -v output for 4.9.0

[Bug c++/60976] New: Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 Bug ID: 60976 Summary: Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 --- Comment #2 from Prathamesh --- Hi, Consider the following test-case: #define FOO(a...) When compiled with: gcc -E -Wpedantic the following warning gets printed: empty-arg.c:1:14: warning: ISO C does not permit named variadic macros [-Wvariadi

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 Prathamesh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org Severity|n

[Bug preprocessor/60975] -Wvariadic-macros does not print warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 Prathamesh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bilbotheelffriend at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug preprocessor/60975] New: a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60975 Bug ID: 60975 Summary: a Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor Assignee: unassigned at g

[Bug tree-optimization/60971] [4.9/4.10 Regression] Wrong code when coercing unsigned char to bool

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60971 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/60974] bfdio.c:580:30: error: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘memset’ call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to dereference it? [-Werror=sizeof-pointer-memaccess]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60974 --- Comment #2 from atvreddy --- thank you so much..!,i will try with new gdb version. thanks for support.. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:30 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug c/60974] bfdio.c:580:30: error: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘memset’ call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to dereference it? [-Werror=sizeof-pointer-memaccess]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60974 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/60974] New: bfdio.c:580:30: error: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘memset’ call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to dereference it? [-Werror=sizeof-pointer-memaccess]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60974 Bug ID: 60974 Summary: bfdio.c:580:30: error: argument to ‘sizeof’ in ‘memset’ call is the same expression as the destination; did you mean to dereference it? [-Werr

[Bug tree-optimization/60973] New: Invalid propagation of a tail call in copyrename2 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60973 Bug ID: 60973 Summary: Invalid propagation of a tail call in copyrename2 pass Product: gcc Version: 4.10.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/40073] Vector short/char shifts generate sub-optimal code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40073 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|