http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 13 02:05:02 2014
New Revision: 209345
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209345&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 22:52:10 2014
New Revision: 209340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209340&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from mainline
PR libfortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-darwin*
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758
Aaro Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60755
Momchil Velikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||momchil.velikov at gmail dot
com
--- C
--- Comment #1 from Momchil Velikov ---
Just stumbled upon essentially the same problem with
c++ (GCC) 4.10.0 20140412 (experimental) [master revision
094da06:e25c6c8:855372a3d3c40b76fed8ff368d37b77d14a488eb]
#include
struct S {
void foo() const;
void bar();
int x = 0;
};
void S::foo() const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Please don't forget to backport the Cilk+ bugfixes to 4.9 branch after 4.9.0 is
released, as long as they are small and non-risky.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Started with r140275:
2008-09-11 Andreas Schwab
* config/m68k/m68k.h (IRA_COVER_CLASSES): Define.
which seems to enable IRA for M68K. The code generation difference for the C
test case at thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 18:50:53 2014
New Revision: 209339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209339&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60810
gfortran.dg/ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60810
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 12 18:42:15 2014
New Revision: 209338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209338&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-04-12 Jerry DeLisle
PR libfortran/60810
io/unit.c (is_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60467
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Sat Apr 12 17:59:29 2014
New Revision: 209337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209337&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/c-family/
PR middle-end/60467
* cilk.c (cilk_set_spawn_marker)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60469
--- Comment #13 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Sat Apr 12 17:57:15 2014
New Revision: 209336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/c/
PR middle-end/60469
* c-array-notation.c (fix_builtin_arra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson ---
All versions from current 4.10/trunk down to and including 4.4.7 have the bug,
but 4.3.6 does not. The code from 4.3.6 is similar to the one from 4.4.7, but
due to a subtle ordering difference 4.3.6 works
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60822
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60828
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50459
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60819
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On April 12, 2014 10:30:31 AM CEST, "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60819
>
>--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
>Created attachment 32586
> -->
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60821
--- Comment #4 from a.h.jaffe at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Whoops, sorry. I better let Darwin folks look at it.
Ah, but in fact *I* misunderstood. There's a difference between the FSF and
Apple versions:
"F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60819
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 32586
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32586&action=edit
Richard's small patch
I regtested it (patch from comment #9 plus a testcase) on x86_64-linux-gnu and
it passed. I
19 matches
Mail list logo
