http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60322
Bug ID: 60322
Summary: Incorrect bounds on polymorphic dummy array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60307
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Makhalov ---
It's new processor architecture. It doesn't present in GCC sources.
I've took a look through all targets and figured out that there are no targets
who supports cc0 and conditional execution together. So it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
--- Comment #21 from supp...@zzz-deskmobile.desk-mail.com ---
__
Type your response ABOVE THIS LINE to reply
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043
David Fries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david at fries dot net
--- Comment #20 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58448
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59347
--- Comment #7 from Volker Reichelt ---
*** Bug 58448 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |gcov-profile
Severity|critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60321
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetgupta22 at gmail dot com
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60321
Bug ID: 60321
Summary: compiler error: in gcov_open, at gcov-io.c:82
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60320
Bug ID: 60320
Summary: Redundant static initialization check
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60314
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20140222 (experimental) [trunk revision 208040] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O0 -c foo.c
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O0 -c main.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -flto -O1 foo.o main.o
$ a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -flto -Os foo.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60318
Bug ID: 60318
Summary: Documentation bug: C++ Misunderstandings: Implicit
Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/online
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60173
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60173
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Sat Feb 22 16:58:06 2014
New Revision: 208044
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208044&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/60173
* lib/target-supports.exp
(check_effective_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60173
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
--- Comment #8 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Tobias,
I tried giving rng_t a component to avoid that - it didn't work :-(
Cheers
Paul
On 22 February 2014 16:35, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57742
--- Comment #13 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> Yes, the fact that the return value p cannot be equal to q inside the
> function is not exposable.
Richard fixed this in PR 50262, yay!
So this PR is worth worki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> if (src->rng._data != 0B)
> {
> dst->rng._data = (struct rng_t *) __builtin_malloc ((unsigned
> long) src->rng._vptr->_size);
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60317
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60317
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Created attachment 32200
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32200&action=edit
preprocessed testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60317
Bug ID: 60317
Summary: [4.9 Regression] find_hard_regno_for compile time hog
in libvpx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60316
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60314
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Huh, this is valid C++? ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60308
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60306
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59198
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59599
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59599
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Feb 22 12:41:53 2014
New Revision: 208043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208043&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/59599
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60307
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Which target is this? Can you provide a test case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59599
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Sat Feb 22 12:22:17 2014
New Revision: 208042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208042&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fortran/
PR fortran/59599
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193
Max TenEyck Woodbury changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60292
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The ICE is fixed by the patch in comment 2. Regtesting started, results on
Monday.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60316
Bug ID: 60316
Summary: Addition of options to GCC fputs(), License addition
and Comment Correction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60308
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60314
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60308
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Sat Feb 22 10:24:11 2014
New Revision: 208041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-22 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/60308
* include/bits/stl_dequ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
--- Comment #14 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Sat Feb 22 10:24:11 2014
New Revision: 208041
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208041&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-02-22 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/60308
* include/bits/stl_deq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60315
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58726
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57940
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58833
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53677
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53677
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56030
Bug 56030 depends on bug 54040, which changed state.
Bug 54040 Summary: [x32] Incorrect timeval and timespec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
What|Removed |Added
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54040
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
49 matches
Mail list logo