[Bug sanitizer/60038] New: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ... "((*tls_addr + *tls_size)) <= ((*stk_addr + *stk_size))" on CentOS 5.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60038 Bug ID: 60038 Summary: AddressSanitizer CHECK failed ... "((*tls_addr + *tls_size)) <= ((*stk_addr + *stk_size))" on CentOS 5.10 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug libstdc++/57350] std::align missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57350 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Vladimir Krivopalov from comment #3) > Any chance to get std::align() implementation included in the coming GCC > releases? > What needs to be done for that? It's too late for GCC 4.9 now.

[Bug libstdc++/60020] Considering backport regexp support to 4.8+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60020 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- No.

[Bug libstdc++/60037] SIGFPE in std::generate_canonical

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037 --- Comment #1 from ppluzhnikov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ppluzhnikov Date: Mon Feb 3 06:48:48 2014 New Revision: 207416 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207416&root=gcc&view=rev Log: xfail ext/random/hypergeometric_distribution/operators

[Bug libstdc++/60037] New: SIGFPE in std::generate_canonical

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60037 Bug ID: 60037 Summary: SIGFPE in std::generate_canonical Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/58854] [4.8 regression] "sub sp, fp, #40" hoisted above frame accesses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854 Alexa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alexa.gerancho at hushmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c/60036] New: Spurious signedness conversion warning with relational operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60036 Bug ID: 60036 Summary: Spurious signedness conversion warning with relational operator Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/60034] "invalid expression as operand" in aarch64 inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Host|x86_64-u

[Bug libgomp/60035] New: [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60035 Bug ID: 60035 Summary: [PATCH] make it possible to use OMP on both sides of a fork (without violating standard) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/60034] "invalid expression as operand" in aarch64 inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034 Kugan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kuganv at linaro dot org --- Comment #2 from Kuga

[Bug c++/43407] Specifying visibility attribute of C++0x enum class emits warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43407 Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Jobst.Ziebell

[Bug target/60034] New: "invalid expression as operand" in aarch64 inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034 Bug ID: 60034 Summary: "invalid expression as operand" in aarch64 inline asm Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/60034] "invalid expression as operand" in aarch64 inline asm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034 --- Comment #1 from Kugan --- Created attachment 32018 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32018&action=edit Proposed patch

[Bug fortran/57019] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Compiler crashes (and make wrong assignments) at some combinations of pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57019 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roshan.shariff at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/58047] parse error with typedef introduced from base class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58047 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 --- Comment #12 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fabien Date: Sun Feb 2 20:02:37 2014 New Revision: 207408 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207408&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-02-02 Fabien Chene PR c++/37140 * parse

[Bug c++/37140] type inherited from base class not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37140 --- Comment #11 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: fabien Date: Sun Feb 2 19:58:06 2014 New Revision: 207407 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207407&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-02-02 Fabien Chene PR c++/37140 * parse

[Bug c++/60033] gcc 4.9.0 20140107: ICE in retrieve_specialization while compiling recursive generic lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033 --- Comment #1 from Richard Vock --- I know I left a redundant composer c; line in there. Just ignore that...

[Bug c++/60033] New: gcc 4.9.0 20140107: ICE in retrieve_specialization while compiling recursive generic lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60033 Bug ID: 60033 Summary: gcc 4.9.0 20140107: ICE in retrieve_specialization while compiling recursive generic lambda Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/60013] [4.9 Regression] Build of 176.gcc from CPU2000 loops in cc1 starting with r207231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60013 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg00035.html

[Bug target/60032] [4.9 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/60032] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60032 Bug ID: 60032 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:411 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/60013] [4.9 Regression] Build of 176.gcc from CPU2000 loops in cc1 starting with r207231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60013 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #32014|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug testsuite/60031] dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok is not enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60031 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug testsuite/60031] New: dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok is not enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60031 Bug ID: 60031 Summary: dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok is not enough Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/60017] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Struct not returned correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60017 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sun Feb 2 15:35:53 2014 New Revision: 207399 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207399&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/60017 * config/i386/i386.c (classify_argument): Fi

[Bug target/60017] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Struct not returned correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60017 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --

[Bug ipa/59469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LLVM build failure with gcc LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469 --- Comment #38 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- So maybe the following patch is enough: diff --git a/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c b/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c index f5f9d1318ee0..bdb536131707 100644 --- a/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c +++ b/gcc/lto/lto-symtab.c @@ -57,7 +

[Bug rtl-optimization/60030] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5903

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60030 Bug ID: 60030 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5903 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/60030] [4.9 regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5903

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60030 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/60029] [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0

[Bug target/60029] New: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60029 Bug ID: 60029 Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: c-c++-common/dfp/convert-bfp.c -std=c++11 execution test Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/59469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LLVM build failure with gcc LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469 --- Comment #37 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- I think the error is that the symbol from the explicit template instantiation in Function.ii (marked with forced_by_abi) gets merged with the symbol in the same COMDAT group from BasicBlock.ii. (This sy

[Bug middle-end/60013] [4.9 Regression] Build of 176.gcc from CPU2000 loops in cc1 starting with r207231

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60013 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 32014 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32014&action=edit A patch I am testing this patch.

[Bug target/60017] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Struct not returned correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60017 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-darwin*|x86_64 Status|NEW

[Bug target/51518] ICE: in expand_call, at calls.c:3421 with -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args and __attribute__ ((ms_abi)) (after sorry)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51518 David Binderman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/57033] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE on extended derived type and default initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57033 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin --- Author: mikael Date: Sun Feb 2 11:50:28 2014 New Revision: 207396 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207396&root=gcc&view=rev Log: fortran/ PR fortran/57033 * primary.c (gfc_convert_to_struct

[Bug target/60028] New: TIC6X: B3 register (return address) is saved on stack when real call is replaced with sibling call in a leaf function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60028 Bug ID: 60028 Summary: TIC6X: B3 register (return address) is saved on stack when real call is replaced with sibling call in a leaf function Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c++/60027] New: Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60027 Bug ID: 60027 Summary: Problem with braced-init-lists and explicit ctors Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: