http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
--- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> does it work if you configure with --without-build-config? (thus, disable
> bootstrap-debug)
Ok with this option, stage 2 is not compiled with -gtoggle, and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
--- Comment #7 from Andrey H. ---
Kai, so what would be the fix?
IMHO, this bug is quite a show stopper for C++11 threading in Mingw-w64, so
maybe it worth to create a temporary patch for Mingw-w64 compilation with
pthreads support just to have a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56422
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> > Note: The IR has not yet passed the J3/WG5 vote and has thus to be taken
> > with a pinch of salt.
See F08/0086 in http://www.j3-fortran.org/doc/year/14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59784
--- Comment #1 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Jan 30 05:51:30 2014
New Revision: 207297
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-30 Savin Zlobec
PR target/59784
* config/nios2/nios2.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48272
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59707
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 30 05:28:52 2014
New Revision: 207295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59707
* call.c (add_builtin_candidate): Catch dependent types
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59645
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 30 01:54:33 2014
New Revision: 207293
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59989
* pt.c (expand_template_argument_pack): Correct
non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59932
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WONTFIX
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59932
Zhendong Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57226
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |middle-end
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 22:12:09 2014
New Revision: 207285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59989
* pt.c (expand_template_argument_pack): Correct
non
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59707
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9 regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 21:28:20 2014
New Revision: 207284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58466
* pt.c (unify_pack_expansion): Call expand_template_ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49425
Tero Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59991
--- Comment #1 from Paul Keir ---
Created attachment 31988
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31988&action=edit
The output following: g++ -std=c++1y bug.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59991
Bug ID: 59991
Summary: Recursive lambda capture in C++1y constexpr function
template causes internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49346
Tero Koskinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Seems rather like bug 58416 to me, if I understand it correctly (SFmode
and DFmode x87 floating-point loads wrongly used when the result is used
other than for arithmetic). Should only affe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58561
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58561
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:54:09 2014
New Revision: 207282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58561
* dwarf2out.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:54:21 2014
New Revision: 207283
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/58466
* pt.c (unify_pack_expansion): Call expand_template_ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58651
--- Comment #4 from Volker Reichelt ---
Just for the records:
The bug was fixed by Jason's patch for PR58812 which also contains the above
testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:44:50 2014
New Revision: 207281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207281&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59956
* friend.c (do_friend): Pass the TEMPLATE_DECL to add_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 29 20:43:44 2014
New Revision: 207280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207280&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/21609
* include/ext/array_allocator.h: Add deprecated
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59883
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
The self-recursion testcase is wrong, as can be seen by the following testcase:
#include
struct A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return foo()+1;}
};
struct B: public A
{
virtual int foo (void) {return 1;}
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59968
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
For
---
int
foo1 (int x, int y)
{
x &= 1 << y;
return x != 0;
}
---
combine fails to try
(set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(compare:CCZ (and:SI (lshiftrt:SI (reg/v:SI 88 [ x ])
(subreg:QI (reg/v:SI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59990
Bug ID: 59990
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 regression] incorrect memcpy optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58843
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54440
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59989
Bug ID: 59989
Summary: ICE when a template parameter pack is explicitly
specified for a function template and provides a
complete argument list for a template
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, the copy in the sources needs to be fixed. Does mingw-w64 always use
winpthread?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No matter where I put the deprecated attribute or how many times I instantiate
the class template I can't get any deprecated warning. (PR 33911, but it
usually warns if you instantiate the type twice.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59807
--- Comment #4 from Andrey H. ---
Thanks Jonathan, I followed your suggestion regarding os_defines.h, recompiled
the whole mingw-w64 toolchain and can confirm that it helps. But doesn't it
meant that it should be fixed in GCC sources itself (I mea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55650
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Wed Jan 29 18:36:42 2014
New Revision: 207277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207277&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Markus Trippelsdorf
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
--- Comment #2 from tom at failproof dot be ---
Created attachment 31986
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31986&action=edit
Problematic source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
--- Comment #1 from tom at failproof dot be ---
Created attachment 31985
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31985&action=edit
Command-line output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59988
Bug ID: 59988
Summary: Failing to specialize template class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58567
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:58:37 2014
New Revision: 207276
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207276&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58846
* decl.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59968
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31974|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58674
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:54:51 2014
New Revision: 207275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207275&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-01-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58674
* pt.c (ins
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59987
Bug ID: 59987
Summary: [C++11]: Missing ios_base::hexfloat format specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #27 from Jay ---
The patch looks very very reasonable
imho. I had a few reasonable patches.
- Jay
On Jan 29, 2014, at 9:25 AM, "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
>
> --- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59981
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59617
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:35:19 2014
New Revision: 207274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207274&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/59617
* gcc.target/i386/avx512f-gath
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333
--- Comment #26 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Sergey from comment #23)
> cc -V:
> cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_i386 Patch 124868-01 2007/07/12
That thing belongs in a museum.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 29 17:13:01 2014
New Revision: 207271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59916
* optimize.c (maybe_thunk_body): Build a RETURN_EXPR fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59916
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59923
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
No disagreement this won't address 59920, where we clearly need to avoid
creating the unnecessary edges in the first place to do something sensible for
that BZ.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini ---
I agree, let's deprecate it for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59956
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59986
Bug ID: 59986
Summary: Unnecessary edges in the CFG due to setjmp
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #18 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Some more analysis:
The target code expands non-bwx QImode store
;; MEM[(I8 *)_67] = _69;
via alpha_expand_mov_nobwx, where around line 2229 (config/alpha.c) target
address gets checked with "aligned_memory_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21609
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38341
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-elf-gcc |arm-elf-gcc,x86
Status|UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #29 from Ryan Mansfield ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #28)
> (In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #27)
> > Yep, that fixes the ICE. Thanks
>
> Could you please bootstrap/regtest it if you have hw for that?
Yep, I ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
I have a patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56922
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59283
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |---
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53221
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmmikolajczyk at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, just compiling bitmap.c at -O3 I see a compare-debug failure and
> ./cc1plus -quiet -O3 bitmap.ii -fopt-info-vec -g
> ./cc1plus -quiet -O3 bitmap.ii -fopt-info-vec
/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
does it work if you configure with --without-build-config? (thus, disable
bootstrap-debug)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53756
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot
com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59565
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58846
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59829
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59951
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59980
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Ryan Mansfield from comment #27)
> Yep, that fixes the ICE. Thanks
Could you please bootstrap/regtest it if you have hw for that?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59565
Ulrich Drepper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59829
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Jan 29 14:57:42 2014
New Revision: 207241
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207241&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/59829
* include/bits/stl_vector.h (vector::data()): Ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59985
Bug ID: 59985
Summary: stage2/3 compare error on lto-streamer-in.o
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootst
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59977
David Kredba changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58742
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 29 14:45:44 2014
New Revision: 207239
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207239&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-29 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58742
* tree-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59575
--- Comment #27 from Ryan Mansfield ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #25)
> Created attachment 31980 [details]
> gcc49-pr59575.patch
>
> Ah, of course, you're right, num_dwarf_regs is uninitialized. Fixed thusly.
Yep, that fixes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
Created attachment 31981
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31981&action=edit
test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
Bug ID: 59984
Summary: OpenMP and Cilk Plus SIMD pragma makes loop incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
