http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59731
Dmitry G. Dyachenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 9 07:30:16 2014
New Revision: 206457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/59724
* ifcvt.c (cond_exec_process_if_block): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 9 07:21:21 2014
New Revision: 206456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/59724
* ifcvt.c (cond_exec_process_if_block): Do
unk (date 20140108, after Sandra and Bernd's fixes):
ldrbr3, [r0]@ zero_extendqisi2 <= Incorrect. Load byte
movsr2, #4
bfir3, r2, #0, #8
strbr3, [r0]
bxlr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58525
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Ivchenko ---
(In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #5)
> Alexander, Jason, can this bug be closed as fixed?
Yes, it is fixed now in trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59733
Bug ID: 59733
Summary: [4.9 Regression] bootstrap-asan failed to bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note this might be related to PR 59700.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #10 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Author: hp
Date: Thu Jan 9 00:23:22 2014
New Revision: 206453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline
2013-12-23 Hans-Peter Nilsson
PR m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59732
Bug ID: 59732
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp: invalid address
operand in MEM_REF
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Unfortunately it triggers (sccp no longer optimizes) on quite a few testcases:
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58277-1.c
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr58831.c
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59387.c
gcc.dg/pr58010.c
gcc.dg/torture
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59730
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Sure, if Jason agrees, I can do it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59471
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 8 22:33:12 2014
New Revision: 206448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206448&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59471
* gcc.dg/pr59471.c (foo): Avoid vector type arg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59137
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jan 8 22:16:49 2014
New Revision: 206445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/59137
* reorg.c (steal_de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59714
--- Comment #4 from Michael Hudson-Doyle ---
OK, so I should stop talking about accurate and instead talk about surprising
:-)
I think it is pretty surprising that x/x != 1+0i for (I think) all x where the
ratio between the real and imaginary par
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59335
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59712
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59730
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59729
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C++11 allows type |[DR1732] C++11 allows type
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59731
Bug ID: 59731
Summary: [4.9 regression] RTL check: expected code 'set' or
'clobber', have 'parallel' in combine_reaching_defs,
at ree.c:711
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59684
David Kredba changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #9 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to janus from comment #8)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #7)
>
> Thanks for checking, Harald. So XLF and NAG agree with gfortran on comment
> 6. That's the easy part (since the interpreta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59730
Bug ID: 59730
Summary: ICE: in type_dependent_expression_p, at cp/pt.c:19969
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59587
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jan 8 19:54:29 2014
New Revision: 206442
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206442&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove target_cpu_default/cpu_names
Add processor names to processor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59587
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Created attachment 31778 [details]
> gcc49-pr59724.patch
Thanks, I have started native bootstrap (+ regtests) on alpha.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59137
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #7)
Thanks for checking, Harald. So XLF and NAG agree with gfortran on comment 6.
That's the easy part (since the interpretation of these cases is explicitly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59728
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59728
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59614
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59614
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 8 18:48:31 2014
New Revision: 206439
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/59614
* class.c (abi_tag_data): Add tags field.
(check_ab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59729
Bug ID: 59729
Summary: C++11 allows type definitions in conditions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
To add to this discussion, here are two examples from the F08 standard (section
C.9.6):
module fruits
type :: fruit
end type
type, extends(fruit) :: apple
end type
type, extends(fruit)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 8 18:41:22 2014
New Revision: 206438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206438&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/59722
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_analyze_params_uses): Ignore uses in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59728
Bug ID: 59728
Summary: gcc.target/mips/octeon-baddu-1.c is failing (finds 3
double adds instead of 4)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
this patch solves the testcase.
The first hunk gets rid of the redundant NOP_EXPR converting TRUTH_EXPR from
INT to BOOL. The second improves gimplifier to not introduce unnecesary
control flow.
If this ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59727
Bug ID: 59727
Summary: reading from character string returns end of file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31778
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31778&action=edit
gcc49-pr59724.patch
Ugh, what a mess. So, while ifcvt wants flow_find_head_matching_sequence to
count only activ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #17)
> The patch seems to work and it seems to give correct answers for various
> cases of multiple inheritance I can think of. I would welcome testing on
> the or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58585
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
The patch seems to work and it seems to give correct answers for various cases
of multiple inheritance I can think of. I would welcome testing on the
original sources and if it looks fine, I will go ahead with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #52 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Wed Jan 8 17:25:38 2014
New Revision: 206437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Bernd Edlinger
PR middle-end/57748
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Fe produces:
unit size
align 32 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x76ede690 precision
32 min max
pointer_to_this >
side-effects
arg 0
unit size
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In our case here, the two corresponding arguments are polymorphic, with the
type of the second one being an extension of the type of the first.
Therefore the second one is type-compatible with the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> I will re-check the Fortran standard on this issue ...
The relevant section in the F08 standard is 12.4.3.4.5, which says:
"Two dummy arguments are distinguish
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59726
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64_be |aarch64_be-*-*
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31777
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31777&action=edit
gcc49-pr59387.patch
So like this? I'll bootstrap/regtest it with additional logging to see how
often we refuse t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59726
Bug ID: 59726
Summary: [4.9 Regression AArch64_be] r206148 (PR
tree-optimization/59544) causes ICE at -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #2)
> It is fixed by this simple patch:
The patch fails on typebound_operator_14.f90 in the testsuite, which is very
similar to the test case here and comes from PR 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59725
Bug ID: 59725
Summary: [4.9 Regression ARM,AArch64] r206148 (PR
tree-optimization/59544) caused regressions in pr52943
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||alpha-linux-gnu
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59724
Bug ID: 59724
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE : in rtl_verify_bb_layout, at
cfgrtl.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59360
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.niebler at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59669
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59669
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:37:35 2014
New Revision: 206431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206431&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/59669
* omp-low.c (simd_clone_adjust): Don't crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:32:50 2014
New Revision: 206430
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206430&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/59610
testsuite/
* gcc.dg/ipa/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:25:22 2014
New Revision: 206429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206429&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Janus Weil
PR fortran/58182
* resolve.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31776
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31776&action=edit
gcc49-pr59722.patch
Untested fix (including reduced testcase).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Waiting for "some" testcase.
gfortran.dg/namelist_64.f90
(see comment 0), but you can pick most of gfortran.dg/namelist_*.f90 it you
prefer:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/namelist_11.f -O0 (internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jan 8 15:06:22 2014
New Revision: 206428
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206428&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-08 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/59610
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_comput
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
*R.4 = pr59711.f (); [return slot optimization]
ah, so we don't require a WITH_SIZE_EXPR on a RSO call. Obviously. So it
should be fixable either by the gimplifier or by the frontends (as Ada
does it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59721
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rafal at rawicki dot org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59723
Bug ID: 59723
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_tree, at
lto-streamer-out.c:1390 when compiling some Fortran
tests with -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31775
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31775&action=edit
alternative patch
Alternative patch splitting critical edges again. I'm going to test that, it
fixes optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59584
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> I still think this is not the correct definition of regression, I believe
> regression is regressing against released compiler version. If somebody
> commits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > That's only optimizable after the 'mergephi' pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 31774
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31774&action=edit
untested patch
Like with the attached patch which performs edge-insertion. But it doesn't
work that way because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59125
--- Comment #8 from Rafał Rawicki ---
I'm hurt by this bug too. Is there a chance of porting the fix to 4.8.3
release?
I see that simple cherry-picking this patch onto 4.8 line is not possible,
because 4.8 and 4.9 branches diverged too much.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59387
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Well, it should pass and check folded_casts to analyze_scalar_evolution_in_loop
and not do anything if that is set to true and the type is
TYPE_OVERFLOW_UNDEFINED (see simple_iv).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
Bug ID: 59722
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure on
i686-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59721
Bug ID: 59721
Summary: [4.8 Regression] std::bind nested more than one level
results in infinite template substitution
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59660
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
> That's only optimizable after the 'mergephi' pass. Before the
> temporary setting is shared by the n==m code. Thus maybe
> 'mergephi' itself can handle this ...
Yep, mergephi seems like resonable place (at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
virtual SSA form is broken, we have overlapping life-ranges - a virtual PHI
node is missing in bb 6, seems to be broken by store sinking (-fno-tree-sink
fixes it). The virtual SSA form updating is too simple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59720
Bug ID: 59720
Summary: Re: f2003/f2008, class/extends, multiple gemeric
assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59719
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Related to / dup of PR28865 and PR57180 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59669
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59715
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
Created attachment 31772
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31772&action=edit
pr59711.adb
Here's the same thing in Ada (where it actually works—it's actually fairly
idiomatic code, I believe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59711
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
> I believe this isn't fixable with the GIMPLE IL as-is - without lowering
> to the fact that g () returns by storing to a return slot. Not sure why
> 3.4 ICEd (2.95.2 also ICEs btw ...).
Because historicall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59560
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
