http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58668
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 7 07:54:47 2014
New Revision: 206385
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206385&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/58668
* cfgcleanup.c (flow_find_cross_jump): Do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59643
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 7 07:49:10 2014
New Revision: 206384
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206384&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59643
* tree-predcom.c (split_data_refs_to_comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59436
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 7 07:47:57 2014
New Revision: 206383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR pch/59436
* tree-core.h (struct tree_optimization_option): Chang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58182
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The ICE seems to be gone at r206252. Can we close this PR?
I still get an ICE with r206348 when compiling the test in two files, but not
when merged in a single file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59709
--- Comment #1 from Akira Takahashi ---
Boost version is 1.55.0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59709
Bug ID: 59709
Summary: break program behavior with optimization
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56273
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #17 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Bug ID: 59708
Summary: clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59648
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to David Kredba from comment #10)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> > So, invalid.
>
> Xorg not agrees:
>
> No, it's clearly valid, since PanoramiXNumScreens will always be set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
Andrew Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrewjcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59648
--- Comment #10 from David Kredba ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> So, invalid.
Xorg not agrees:
No, it's clearly valid, since PanoramiXNumScreens will always be set > 1
in PanoramiXExtensionInit() if noPanoramiXExtension
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59652
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
The fundamental issue is how these insns are reloaded:
(insn 223 222 224 7 (set (reg/f:SI 2448)(high:SI (symbol_ref:SI
("resource") [flags 0x200] ))) ../../../texk/xdvik/xdvi.c:2968 52 {*pa.md:26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59707
Bug ID: 59707
Summary: [4.8.2] Crash when using std::map with template class
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
The attached patch fixes the code in comment #1. I'm currently
doing the regtest.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
r204463 (2013-11-06) gives the ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jan 6 23:21:39 2014
New Revision: 206379
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-06 Janus Weil
PR fortran/59589
* class.c (com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The same ICE occurs when putting it into the main program:
integer i
do concurrent (i=1:2)
end do
contains
subroutine f
end
end
Backtrace:
internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
inte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59706
Bug ID: 59706
Summary: Regression: ICE with do concurrent and internal
subprogram
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57033
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> > This is due to revision 181425.
>
> Which was the patch for the DT constructor, cf. PR39427, PR37829,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/r181425.
This revision also gives pr56674 and pr5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57129
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> r181425 is Tobias' constructor patch.
This revision also gives pr56674.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56674
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This appeared at r181425.
This revision also gives pr57129.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59705
Bug ID: 59705
Summary: possible compiler bug regarding SFINAE (program
compiles fine)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 6 21:38:27 2014
New Revision: 206375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206375&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59644
* config/i386/i386.h (struct machine_function): Add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59638
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59636
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59635
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59629
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59704
Bug ID: 59704
Summary: Wrong overload chosen, compiler errornously thinks
non-constant zero expression is implicitly castable to
null pointer
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56572
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Proposed patch and subsequent discussions:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01693.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #39 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
r206356 PASS for me all testcases (including my from c#0)
Thanks for fixing the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59398
--- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #1)
> > Thus the assignment from the allocatable function result is broken.
>
> Is it true?
I looked at the discus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56961
--- Comment #4 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
FAIL
gcc version 4.9.0 20140106 (experimental) [trunk revision 206356] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57773
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Jan 6 18:53:01 2014
New Revision: 206373
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/57773
* doc/implement-c.texi: Mention that other integer typ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59638
--- Comment #3 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Mon Jan 6 18:22:48 2014
New Revision: 206371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206371&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/59638
PR c++/59638
* cp/parser.c (cp_parser_init_decla
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59629
--- Comment #1 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Mon Jan 6 18:22:38 2014
New Revision: 206370
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206370&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/59629
PR c++/59629
* cp/parser.c (cp_parser_lambda_exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59636
--- Comment #2 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Mon Jan 6 18:22:29 2014
New Revision: 206369
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206369&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/59636
PR c++/59636
* cp/parser.c (cp_parser_template_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59635
--- Comment #2 from Adam Butcher ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Mon Jan 6 18:22:19 2014
New Revision: 206368
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206368&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/59635
PR c++/59635
* cp/lambda.c (maybe_add_lambda_con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
--- Comment #9 from Mike Frysinger ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00213.html has been committed now
which should fix trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59703
Bug ID: 59703
Summary: using declaration in class mishandles type aliases
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59039
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59656
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59698
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59610
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59665
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*sigh* we'd need to say ::std everywhere to support that code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
--- Comment #9 from nullnilaki at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31758
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31758&action=edit
preprocess scope.c(NO.3)
preprocess scope.c(This source is very large. Please concatenate files.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
--- Comment #8 from nullnilaki at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31757
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31757&action=edit
preprocess scope.c(NO.2)
preprocess scope.c(This source is very large. Please concatenate files.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
--- Comment #7 from nullnilaki at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 31756
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31756&action=edit
preprocess scope.c(NO.1)
preprocess scope.c(This source is very large. Please concatenate files.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58115
--- Comment #11 from edlinger at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Mon Jan 6 16:34:52 2014
New Revision: 206364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Reverted r205593
2013-12-02 Bernd Edlinger
PR targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59701
Bug ID: 59701
Summary: A variadic alias template aliasing another variadic
alias template doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59679
--- Comment #6 from nullnilaki at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> This is still not the preprocessed source. We need the preprocessed source
> and the exact options you used to compile the source and the exact optio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58252
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am still hoping for help from C++ FE maintainers, but I think the bits we are
missing is logic from
tree
lookup_base (tree t, tree base, base_access access,
base_kind *kind_ptr, tsubst_flags_t c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59702
Bug ID: 59702
Summary: Infinite recursion in a late-specified return type of
a function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59702
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen ---
I forgot to mention that clang accepts the code.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59700
Bug ID: 59700
Summary: Misleading/buggy runtime error message: Bad integer
for item 0 in list input
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: min
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59008
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59008
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 6 14:05:25 2014
New Revision: 206361
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206361&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-06 Martin Jambor
PR ipa/59008
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_discove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59699
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Yeleighton ---
Also, anchor "Effective C++ CD" only, since the anchor does not link to the
example.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59699
Bug ID: 59699
Summary: Effective C++ has moved
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59398
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59698
Bug ID: 59698
Summary: The type of NULL is described elsewhere
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59664
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> I guess it is problematic to include in the test, because then you
> rely on whatever the vendor math.h does.
>
> Does it still FAIL if you remo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59694
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59697
Bug ID: 59697
Summary: Function attribute __target_(("no-avx)) work on
Windows/mingw but fails on Linux.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59510
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59510
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 6 11:39:41 2014
New Revision: 206356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/59350
PR debug/59510
* var-tracking.c (add_stores):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
--- Comment #37 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 6 11:39:41 2014
New Revision: 206356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206356&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/59350
PR debug/59510
* var-tracking.c (add_stores)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59662
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #17 from Pawel Sikora ---
pure gcc 4.9.0 20140106 still fails:
Breakpoint 2, main () at pr53477.cpp:15
(gdb) p wordBitsetMap
$1 = std::map with 1 elementsTraceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/pawels/gcc/4.9/shar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29383
Bug 29383 depends on bug 59023, which changed state.
Bug 59023 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in gfc_search_interface with BIND(C)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
What|Removed |Added
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59662
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jan 6 11:31:34 2014
New Revision: 206355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-06 Janus Weil
PR fortran/59023
PR fortran/5966
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jan 6 11:31:34 2014
New Revision: 206355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=206355&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-01-06 Janus Weil
PR fortran/59023
PR fortran/596
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59644
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #20)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #17)
> > > If I add "pushq %r10" and "popq%r10" by han
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|debug
--- Comment #36 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59696
Bug ID: 59696
Summary: Global compilation of Binutils 2.21/Newlib 1.19/GCC
4.3.5 for MMIX doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #216 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
Created attachment 31749
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31749&action=edit
attachment-6571-0.dat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #217 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #221 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
Created attachment 31753
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31753&action=edit
attachment-10002-0.dat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #218 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #220 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #220 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #210 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #213 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
Created attachment 31747
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31747&action=edit
attachment-5051-0.dat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #211 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #211 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #209 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #208 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15966
--- Comment #204 from jochen.kuepper at cfel dot de ---
You have contacted me on an old email address at the FHI Berlin. This account
will soon not be available anymore. Please change your address book to use
jochen.kuep...@cfel.de.
On 06.01.2014,
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
