http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59323
Bug ID: 59323
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Int. comp. error: in
add_AT_specification, at dwarf2out.c:4026
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58627
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33799
Kenton Varda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temporal at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from Manuel Ló
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #50 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Paulo J. Matos from comment #49)
> I noticed that enabling misaligned moves have created a few test failures on
> my port. Namely: execute.exp=20051113-1.c. It was generating one too many
> move
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59304
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|#pragma diagnostic pop |#pragma diagnostic pop
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131127 (experimental) [trunk revision 205463] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c small.c
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
$ gcc-4.8.2 -O1 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘foo’:
small.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Nov 27 23:54:26 2013
New Revision: 205468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Also handle REG_XXX notes in spill_pseudos
PR rtl-optimization/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #43 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 23:41:56 2013
New Revision: 205466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205466&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57393
PR tree-optimization/58018
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 23:42:48 2013
New Revision: 205467
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205467&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/59310
* c-parser.c (c_parser_omp_target): Copy "#pragma omp tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58131
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 23:41:56 2013
New Revision: 205466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205466&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57393
PR tree-optimization/58018
PR tree-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58018
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 23:41:56 2013
New Revision: 205466
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205466&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/57393
PR tree-optimization/58018
PR tree-optimizat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59321
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
-print-prog-name=foobar gives the path name of program, foobar.
which isn't necessarily used by the GCC driver:
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc-4.6.3-x32]$ ./bin/gcc -print-prog-name=as
as
[hjl@gnu-6 gcc-4.6.3-x32]$ ./bin/gcc -pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59032
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code
Summary|[4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59321
Bug ID: 59321
Summary: -fuse-ld does not have effect on -print-prog-name
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59199
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 31315
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31315&action=edit
A patch
I don't know why this patch works.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19449
Ryan Lortie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||desrt at desrt dot ca
--- Comment #7 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
--- Comment #9 from Rolf Eike Beer ---
Created attachment 31314
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31314&action=edit
ii file of testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@sf-mail.de
--- Comment #8 from Rolf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 31313
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31313&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34740
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-03-29 08:22:06 |2013-11-27
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
This pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
remove_pseudos in lra-spills.c failed to handle
REG_CFA_SET_VDRAP note.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #3 from David Kaufmann ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > What is the size of fl ?
>
> What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl?
yes, i am, but if the co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
/* Terminate the search in check_eliminable_occurrences at
this point. */
*recog_data.operand_loc[i] = 0;
sets DEST to NULL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> What is the size of fl ?
What I mean are you going past the bounds of the array fl?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What is the size of fl ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
LRA calls
(gdb) bt
#0 elimination_costs_in_insn (insn=0x71a30ee8)
at /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gcc/reload1.c:3694
#1 0x00d0419f in calculate_elim_costs_all_insns ()
at /export/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59320
Bug ID: 59320
Summary: ftree-vrp breaks simple loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
A small testcase compiled with -std=c++1y -m32:
--
namespace std
{
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
}
namespace std
{
template
class initializer_list
{
public:
typedef size_t size_type;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59319
Bug ID: 59319
Summary: gcc does not emit DW_AT_friend or DW_TAG_friend
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59318
Bug ID: 59318
Summary: ICE on invalid C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56788
--- Comment #15 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 27 18:07:22 2013
New Revision: 205458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205458&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/56788
* gcc.target/i386/xop-frczX.c: New test.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
FWIW, also works on 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59131
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2013-11-14 00:00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:06:44 2013
New Revision: 205457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205457&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59014
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59014-2.c: New
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:05:21 2013
New Revision: 205456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2013-11-26 Jakub Jelinek
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Nov 27 17:03:27 2013
New Revision: 205454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205454&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/59014
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr59014-2.c: New
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58125
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
Feel free to add a comment mentioning the hook targets need to define for
this test to pass.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Nov 27 16:30:48 2013
New Revision: 205451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205451&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-27 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/57410
* gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59317
Bug ID: 59317
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [LRA,MIPS] ICE: in check_rtl, at
lra.c (insn does not satisfy constraints)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00131.html - the failures
indicate the architecture maintainers have not yet added this hook (for
either SPARC, or ARM, or any non-x86 architecture)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59305
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
For powerpc see: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-11/msg00131.html - the
failures indicate the architecture maintainers have not yet added this
hook.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58647
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 27 15:55:18 2013
New Revision: 205449
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205449&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-27 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58647
* semantics
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57904
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We have:
:
ubound.0_3 = 0;
size.1_4 = ubound.0_3 + 1;
size.1_5 = MAX_EXPR ;
_6 = size.1_5 * 4;
_7 = (character(kind=4)) _6;
_8 = MAX_EXPR <_7, 1>;
sizes_9 = __builtin_malloc (_8);
size.3_10 = MAX_EXPR ;
_11 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59237
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |sparc*-sun-solaris2.*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59316
Bug ID: 59316
Summary: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-5.c FAILs on
Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59315
Bug ID: 59315
Summary: [4.9 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wunused-3.C FAILs on
Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Nov 27 15:18:23 2013
New Revision: 205447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205447&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-27 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/58723
* cgraphbuild.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59314
Bug ID: 59314
Summary: [DR 1054] [C++11] access to volatile through reference
should cause load
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 31310
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31310&action=edit
gcc49-pr59014-test.patch
Testcase that reproduces also on 4.8 and 4.7. I'll bootstrap/regtest both
patches now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59014
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
CC|jakub at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59312
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Which document are you looking at? That's not what 12.8/23 in the standard
says.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313
Bug ID: 59313
Summary: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: |[4.9 Regression] FAIL:
|g++.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59312
Bug ID: 59312
Summary: Incorrect warning "defaulted move assignment for ...
calls a non-trivial move assignment operator for
virtual base ..."
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Breakpoint 1, c_parser_omp_simd (loc=loc@entry=9494,
parser=parser@entry=0x7590f540,
p_name=0x7fffd6a0 "I teams distribute simd teams distribute parallel
for", mask=mask@entry=20113958316,
cclauses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bviyer at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47334
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
This issue now causes new failures on Solaris 9 with Sun as:
FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-1.c -O2 -flto (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Breakpoint 4, 0x007fb146 in gimplify_cilk_spawn (spawn_p=, before=,
after=) at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/c-family/cilk.c:774
774 if (*arg_array == NULL_TREE)
(gdb) bt
#0 0x007fb146 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(gdb) f 0
#0 dwarf2out_frame_debug (insn=0x75980ca8) at
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/dwarf2cfi.c:2000
2000 fde->vdrap_reg = dwf_regno (n);
(gdb) p n
$2 = (rtx_def *) 0x7597cd40
(gdb) call deb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
==8030==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address
0x0297d2e4 at pc 0xe64e63 bp 0x7fffe2f360f0 sp 0x7fffe2f360e8
READ of size 4 at 0x0297d2e4 thread T0
#0 0xe64e62
(/export/build/gnu/gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59311
Bug ID: 59311
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp1y/vla-initlist1.C (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59310
Bug ID: 59310
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/openmp-simd-1.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59309
Bug ID: 59309
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/cilk-plus/CK/spawnee_inline.c -g
-fcilkplus (test for excess errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259
cjanderson at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19794
Bug 19794 depends on bug 54742, which changed state.
Bug 54742 Summary: Switch elimination in FSM loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
What|Removed |Added
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Schaub ---
We also have this bug and it took us several days to find the cause. Testcase
by my colleague attached.
Perhaps this should fire an assertion if it is hard to fix efficiently, instead
of simply letting thin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35763
Johannes Schaub changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schaub.johannes@googlemail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59136
--- Comment #10 from Alexey Samsonov ---
Hi!
Jakub suggested to use libbacktrace in libsanitizer. I've committed his patch
to LLVM, and it will soon be merged into GCC, with many more changes. So, your
change will not be needed. I've also ensured
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Likely caused by r198611.
This is the patch that exposes the problem.
I have filled this PR due to the difference with IRA vs. reload, it looks that
spill size sho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57189
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59259
cjanderson at yandex dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59306
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Nov 27 11:40:22 2013
New Revision: 205443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205443&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/59306
* ubsan.c (instrument_null): Use gimple_store_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> Eh.
>
> make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-flto/-ffat-lto-objects
> gomp.exp"
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (internal compiler error)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> We fail to stream cfun->has_force_vect_loops.
Note we don't necessarily have to stream that (and has_simduid_loops), the
alternative is to compute it during str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
Eh.
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-flto/-ffat-lto-objects
gomp.exp"
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/declare-simd-1.c (test for excess error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31306|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58723
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31305|0 |1
is obsolete|
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
