http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55915
Yves Caniou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yves.can...@ens-lyon.fr
--- Comment #3 from
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto --disable-werror
--with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131117 (experimental) [trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek ---
See my http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01874.html, that should fix
that -ldl -lpthread already.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #15 from Kostya Serebryany ---
(In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #14)
> Sent to gcc-patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01990.html
>
> As for libubsan, it does not seem to support static link anyway:
you need -l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59106
--- Comment #14 from Yury Gribov ---
Sent to gcc-patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01990.html
As for libubsan, it does not seem to support static link anyway:
/home/ygribov/install/gcc-master/bin/gcc -g repro.i -fsanitize=un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57897
--- Comment #6 from Dongsheng Song ---
After revert r192062, I can build gcc smoothly.
$ svn log -r 192062
r192062 | uros | 2012-10-04 13:53:22 +0800 (Thu, 04 Oct 2012) | 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59165
Bug ID: 59165
Summary: gcc looks up begin(), end() for for-range loops for
ints in namespace std
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58907
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
per
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/regehr/z/compiler-source/gcc/configure
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r204924-install
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131117 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59153
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59153
--- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 17 23:10:10 2013
New Revision: 204925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204925&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/59153
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_address_subreg_op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59163
Bug ID: 59163
Summary: program compiled with g++ -O3 segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59162
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Dup of bug 35634.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 35634 ***
Sorry for the dup; didn't know about this earlier report.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #40
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131117 (experimental) [trunk revision 204920] (GCC)
$
-
int printf (const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59123
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59123
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Nov 17 19:22:43 2013
New Revision: 204923
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204923&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-17 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/59123
* decl.c (v
|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think this is a already fixed.
Agreed. I tried 20131117 and it seems fixed to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59016
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34311
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Anthony Green from comment #3)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #2)
> > However, there is no guarantee in the Darwin m32 ABI that the stacked
> > version of the structs will be appropriately
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Spurious "Type specified|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > propagation, or replace x*-y with -x*y, or move operations across
> > fesetround,
>
> Do you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The warning does not occur with 4.4, i.e. it is a regression in 4.5 and upward.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #4)
> For the intrinsics with arguments it does not seem to happen.
This is simply due to the fact that 'gfc_resolve_intrinsic' apparently is
called more than once (p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In fact the warning seems to happen for all intrinsics which are introduced by
'add_sym_0' in intrinsic.c (all those are functions without arguments), except
those from ISO_FORTRAN_ENV, since they ar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The warning also occurs with 4.5 and 4.6.
Further, it not only occurs for integer functions, but also for
character-valued ones, like FDATE (which, like the previous two, has no
arguments).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> propagation, or replace x*-y with -x*y, or move operations across fesetround,
Do you mean -(x*y)? I don't see the problem with replac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to janus from comment #1)
> Doing the same thing with a different intrinsic like 'cos' does not give the
> warning:
>
> Intrinsic :: cos
> print *, cos(0.)
> End
However, it *does* so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
--- Comment #3 from Jean-Charles Papin ---
Ok, thanks a lot for these information :)
I've just try gcc-4.9 and, as you mentioned, this has been fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59146
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #25 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #22)
> (In reply to janus from comment #19)
> > (In reply to janus from comment #18)
> > That version still yields a good number of testsuite failures, but it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59023
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161
--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil ---
Tested with:
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.6.50.20131109-cvs
libstdcxx/v6/printers.py from GCC r201888 (=with PR libstdc++/53477 fix)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59161
Bug ID: 59161
Summary: GDB pretty printers: iterator->reference not printed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> -floop-parallelize-all ends up using GRAPHITE dependence analysis which is
> what never finishes (is stuck in ISL). I'd say avoid it at all cost (as
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58099
--- Comment #24 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The original regression has been fixed on trunk and 4.8 with r202766 and
r204908, respectively.
Still to do: Fix the test case of comment 14, cf. also comment 17 - 20 as well
as comment 22.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Sun Nov 17 12:00:15 2013
New Revision: 204915
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-17 Janus Weil
Backport from mainline
2013-11-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
Bug ID: 59160
Summary: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails
on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59159
Bug ID: 59159
Summary: Need opaque pass-through as optimization barrier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59061
--- Comment #27 from Alexey Samsonov ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #26)
> libbacktrace doesn't use malloc (unless mmap isn't supported), handles
> inline frames just fine and Ian has posted today a patch to support also
> data symbol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59123
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58771
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58771
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sun Nov 17 08:11:33 2013
New Revision: 204913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204913&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/58771
* trans-io.c (transfer_exp
47 matches
Mail list logo
