http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #11)
> Damn it. Tested the wrong compiler.
>
> The problem with your testcase Markus is you're simply not allowed to pass a
> null pointer to sprintf, memcpy a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'll note further, that an implementation of sprintf, memcpy, etc could check
for a NULL pointer internally and raise a trap on their own rather than
dereferencing the invalid pointer and still be a conformi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
Actually, we also have to check whether finalizers are IMPURE for
nonpolymorphic TYPE. I think we currently don't do so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Damn it. Tested the wrong compiler.
The problem with your testcase Markus is you're simply not allowed to pass a
null pointer to sprintf, memcpy and a variety of other functions. Once you
execute code whi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59104
Bug ID: 59104
Summary: Wrong result with SIZE specification expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59103
Bug ID: 59103
Summary: [OOP] Reject deallocate/intent(out) for polymorphic
var in PURE procedures (IR F08/0033)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
IIRC we already added another safe rotate form this year based on a report by
Niels, you may want to search for that (maybe in the comment before
simplify_rotate in tree-ssa-forwprop.c).
Basically you are askin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58533
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery, |ice-on-valid-code
|ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58637
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58536
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58534
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131112 (experimental) [trunk revision 204721] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.8.2 -Os small.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #7 from Kostya Serebryany ---
Is this fixed by http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204726&root=gcc&view=rev ?
c-r204695-install
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131112 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I ran the testcase you sent. It worked fine for me.
THe problems we're having are within the realm of normal development and they
will be resolved one way or another.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #8)
> Should be fixed via recent commits. Specifically, we preserve the *0 for
> code that wants to catch the null pointer deref.
Well, if you had run the simpl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59100
Bug ID: 59100
Summary: requesting optimization of safe rotate function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59099
Bug ID: 59099
Summary: Erroneous register allocation on 32-bit x86 using
regparm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59098
Bug ID: 59098
Summary: Unwarranted warning: promoted ~unsigned is always
non-zero [-Wsign-compare]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: mino
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59097
Bug ID: 59097
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with invalid statement
expression as array size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Should be fixed via recent commits. Specifically, we preserve the *0 for code
that wants to catch the null pointer deref.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59096
Bug ID: 59096
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with template attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59095
Bug ID: 59095
Summary: FAIL: TestMakeFunc on x32
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Marcus Shawcroft changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus.shawcroft at arm dot com
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #5)
> So far we were not even able to reproduce it.
Building gcc trunk as a cross to ppc64-linux reproduces the build failure for
me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bviyer at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59094
Bug ID: 59094
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Cilk runtime library headers are
installed into the general include directory
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59092
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 12 21:33:06 2013
New Revision: 204720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204720&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Vladimir Makarov
PR other/58712
* ira-costs.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I see the segmentation fault from 4.4 up to trunk. The backtrace for revision
204648 is
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000100109a88 in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment (expr1=,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59054
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:55:58 2013
New Revision: 204718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204718&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Michael Meissner
PR target/59054
* config/rs600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58548
--- Comment #4 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58549
--- Comment #6 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58637
--- Comment #1 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58536
--- Comment #3 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58534
--- Comment #1 from abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: abutcher
Date: Tue Nov 12 20:17:33 2013
New Revision: 204714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Refactor implicit function template implementation and fix 5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
Bug ID: 59093
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault compiling
F90 File
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-11/msg00291.html for more
information on the glibc failure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59092
Bug ID: 59092
Summary: __builtin_trap calls abort for aarch64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #23 from Teresa Johnson ---
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, ubizjak at gmail dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
>
> --- Comment #22 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> (In reply to Teresa Johnson from comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #22 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Teresa Johnson from comment #19)
> Since this was blocking my SPEC testing I took a look. The issue is
> that the new edge_count variable is declared as an int and is
> overflowing. It should be g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #21 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 31200
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31200&action=edit
libiberty patch to push lto-profiledbootstrap further
Additional patch to libiberty to fix some c++ casting warnin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Bug ID: 59091
Summary: __builtin_trap calls abort for arm-linux-gnueabi
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #5 from Kostya Serebryany ---
So far we were not even able to reproduce it.
As I told in another thread, please apply any minimal #ifdef patch to
sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc to make it compile (while keeping tests
running on x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59090
Bug ID: 59090
Summary: Broken debug information for a function containing
__sync_compare_and_swap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat test.c
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
static sigjmp_buf jmpbuf;
static void
sig_handler (int signo)
{
siglongjmp (jmpbuf, 1);
}
int
main (void)
{
char *p = N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #5)
> I need testcases. "the kernel" or "x.org" isn't sufficient for a variety of
> reasons.
Every program that uses a custom sig_handler which only handles
SIG
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I need testcases. "the kernel" or "x.org" isn't sufficient for a variety of
reasons.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #20 from Paulo J. Matos ---
Thanks for fixing this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59083
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
I've seen the same problem also in Inkscape. I will try to create a testcase.
Would it be possible Jeffrey to build one of these programs?
Thanks,
Martin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #9 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Unfortunately associated() does not allow unassociated array pointers as input
so your code works for allocatable arrays but not for array pointers.
Yes, a negative value for size() is good. It is a pity ther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
--- Comment #19 from Teresa Johnson ---
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:11 AM, tejohnson at google dot com
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58862
>
> --- Comment #18 from Teresa Johnson ---
> Just hit this same error with cpu2006 b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59089
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||octoploid at yandex dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59089
--- Comment #1 from M Welinder ---
Version and arch details:
welinder@sherwood:~> gcc -v -Wall -O0 sc.c -lm
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.7/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-suse-linux
Confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59089
Bug ID: 59089
Summary: sin and/or cos produce bogus results with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 12 14:38:49 2013
New Revision: 204703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204703&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn on SEE unaligned load and store for Haswell
Backported from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
--- Comment #2 from Tomohiro Kashiwada ---
C's provides a macro named 'I' and this breaks existing codes.
ext/pod_char_traits.h
gcc4.8.2) http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/qb87YqrI7I4BAQRw
gcc4.7.3) http://melpon.org/wandbox/permlink/ighn7hGeL2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 08:13:14AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
>
> --- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
> I believe most times a code knows if an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59084
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 12 13:52:08 2013
New Revision: 204701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Turn on SEE unaligned load and store for Haswell
PR target/59088
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59088
Bug ID: 59088
Summary: -mtune=core-avx2 doesn't turn on unaligned load/store
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
--- Comment #4 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
Not reproduced on trunk(4.9) any more.
Still reproduced on 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor ---
[...]
> If anyone is willing to test the patch on any platform but especially
> on those which I could not, I'd be very grateful. Thanks.
I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59084
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Nov 12 13:26:51 2013
New Revision: 204700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle AVX256 unaligned load and store
PR target/59084
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
That's an extension, it is done on purpose for compatibility with C code. IMHO
the standard's decision to replace C's complex.h with something completely
unrelated was nonsense.
Did that cause real problems for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474
--- Comment #15 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 12 12:53:53 2013
New Revision: 204698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-11-12 Martin Jambor
PR rtl-optimization/10474
* ira.c (i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59087
Bug ID: 59087
Summary: including complex.h in C++11/1y mode should not
include C's complex.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
--- Comment #10 from Rodrigo Rodrigues ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #8)
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:39:15PM +, rrodrigues at poli dot ufrj.br
> wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58913
> >
> > --- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59086
Bug ID: 59086
Summary: error: ‘asm’ operand has impossible constraints
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57734
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57734
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 12 09:21:45 2013
New Revision: 204697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-11-12 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/57734
* pt.c (loo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59025
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Just had a quick look at 3dview.c and indeed, the only swap of arguments I see
is due to different SSA_NAME_VERSIONs being used by reassoc1 (that is not a
bug) and
then during copyprop5 when a stmt is folded u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #8 from Evgeniy Stepanov ---
I'm a little surprised we did not run into this on Android yet - we use the
same LD_PRELOAD scheme there. Are you linking libasan with libpthread? This
might go away as libpthread constructors call one of t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #7 from Yury Gribov ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6)
> adding attribute ctor to __asan_init is questionable
> - windows has different syntax.
We'll fix that (see the obsolete patch).
> - running non-instrumented bi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58121
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59085
Bug ID: 59085
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
--- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany ---
adding attribute ctor to __asan_init is questionable
- windows has different syntax.
- running non-instrumented binary w/o calling __asan_init at startup is risky:
the binary may call memset/etc an touch s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065
--- Comment #7 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I believe most times a code knows if and when the size of an array
must be nonzero,
so a zerosize array would raise suspicions in those cases.
Anyway in my opinion gfortran run time should detect when an
unal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58937
Alexey Samsonov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugeni.stepanov at gmail dot
com,
90 matches
Mail list logo
