http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I found that
export MALLOC_PERTURB_=256
produces a quiet NaN. I'll use this one in my .bashrc
It seems to me that the earlier symptom of malfunctioning
is in symbol.c:5001 " dummies = sym->formal;" where sym
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58779
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-linux-gnu |x86
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44350
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58837
Bug ID: 58837
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE using invalid
condition in static_assert
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58836
Bug ID: 58836
Summary: ICE with wrong usage of initializer list in non-type
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58835
Bug ID: 58835
Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with __PRETTY_FUNCTION__
in broken function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58834
Bug ID: 58834
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE on __builtin_shuffle within
template function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
--- Comment #3 from Michi Henning ---
To build and run the code in the tarball:
cd exception-fix/build
cmake ..
make
make test
The problem is caused by the call to make_shared on line 33 of
UnityExceptions.h.
If you comment out the initializer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
--- Comment #2 from Michi Henning ---
Created attachment 31066
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31066&action=edit
Stand-alone test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58833
Bug ID: 58833
Summary: RFE: 64-bit native compiler on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53001
--- Comment #26 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 31065
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31065&action=edit
Patch to add -Wfloat-conversion option against trunk with new testcase
This adds a new testcase instead of usi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
--- Comment #5 from Janis Johnson ---
>From Janis in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2009-09/msg00115.html
The TR defines, within each of the classes decimal32, decimal64, and
decimal128, the following conversion:
// 3.2.[234].4 conversion to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
--- Comment #4 from Janis Johnson ---
I vaguely remember a problem with those conversion and have no idea now what it
was, but I'll try to find something in the mailing list archives.
includes a workaround:
/// Non-conforming extension: Conve
igure
--enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto --disable-werror
--enable-checking=release --with-gmp=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-mpfr=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --with-mpc=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--with-cloog=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58753
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58830
Bug ID: 58830
Summary: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting
4.8.x, but not trunk or 4.7.x)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58753
--- Comment #8 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Slightly reduced, I guess...
#include
template
struct X {X(std::initializer_list) {}};
template
class T {
X x{1};
};
int main()
{
T t;
}
This gives
plaatti-reduced2.cpp: In constructor ‘
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58829
Bug ID: 58829
Summary: non-static member initializer in nested template class
produces incorrect compile error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58815
ulf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janis187 at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #3 from ulf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56843
--- Comment #5 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Mon Oct 21 21:40:14 2013
New Revision: 203910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203910&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2013-10-21 Bill Schmidt
Backport from mainline
2013-04-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini ---
Oh good. We can easily fix this then.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41206
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28503
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53069
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57020
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57563
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54621
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57983
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58781
--- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Q; Is this a regression?
A: No.
See http://ideone.com/8JS3Yf
This is gcc-4.8.1 (needed a space between "" and _s but still errors with this:
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48796
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46859
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46157
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27719
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
The patch solves the regression in my recent bootstrap (testresults sent to
mailinglist).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58803
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58803
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Oct 21 19:39:19 2013
New Revision: 203909
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-21 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/58803
* decl.c (mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58728
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Yes: patches should be submitted to the gcc-patches mailing list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58827
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Mon Oct 21 18:40:34 2013
New Revision: 203907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203907&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/58809
* fold-const.c (fold_range_test): Return 0 if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58728
--- Comment #1 from Cong Hou ---
Any comment on this?
thanks,
Cong
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58827
Neil Schellenberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nschellenberger at qnx dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58781
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #31061|0 |1
is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Thanks Ville. Now we are only missing a patch ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58761
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen ---
Reduced:
template
struct X
{
int x = 42;
int y = [this](){return this->x;}();
};
int main()
{
X x;
}
Seems to require a template to trigger, but from that point onwards,
it's quite easy to trigg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
I did not know about MALLOC_PERTURB_ I just put in my .bashrc profile
export MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(($RANDOM % 255 + 1))
gfortran fails in different places if the input file is .f or .f90
As .f I get bus error a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58828
Bug ID: 58828
Summary: Problem compiling gcc 4.8.2 using gcc 4.4.6
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58827
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield ---
Created attachment 31063
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31063&action=edit
2nd preprocessed src
ing fix for 58466)
$ ./xgcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --disable-bootstrap --enable-languages=c++
--enable-checking=yes
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20131021 (experimental) [trunk revision 203899] (GCC)
$ ./
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52015
Tomalak Geret'kal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at kera dot name
--- Comment #23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58781
--- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> ---
Created attachment 31061
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31061&action=edit
Busybox showing that the passed in string to the operator is OK.
When I run the bus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 04:01:43PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Error: Procedure 'yS???+' in generic interface 't' at (1) is neither
> function nor subroutine
>
> where the procedure name is gar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58813
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58759
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58682
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Patch posted for the first testcase:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg01714.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58805
--- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Btw, you'd have had the same issue with the aggregate
> return of a pure/const function call, no?
For this bug to trigger, we need a gimple statement:
- without side-effects
- with one SSA_OP_DEF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58572
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826
--- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
In fact LRA is responsible for this failure - there is a bug in constant
regeneration. LRA correctly regenerates all occurrences of virtual register
which is not allocated(i.e. it does not has a register) bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48592
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58818
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58826
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 31056
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31056&action=edit
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The syntax would be
int main()
{
Actor *act;
::posix_memalign (&act, 16, sizeof (Actor));
new (*act) Actor;
}
that is, you have to use a different allocator. Paolo, does libstdc++
provide a custom al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58823
--- Comment #1 from Aaron Miller ---
Created attachment 31057
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31057&action=edit
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58799
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to pins...@gmail.com from comment #6)
> Less portable as that only works on x86 while posix_memalign works on all
> posix targets.
Or more portable as it also works on non-POSIX platforms such as (n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58823
Bug ID: 58823
Summary: Uninitialized variable warning is missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58013
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code, wrong-debug
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58800
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.4, 4.8.3, 4.9.0
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58817
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58819
Bug ID: 58819
Summary: return value ignored using -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-linux-gnu
Component|rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58794
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The issue being that &a.f and &a.f are not equal because even with
OEP_CONSTANT_ADDRESS_OF set we get into
case COMPONENT_REF:
/* Handle operand 2 the same as for ARRAY_REF. Operand 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58806
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
You cannot find the PR because it's already implemented via the "fn spec"
attribute (conveniently not user-accessible because bike-shedding about
whether separate attributes are required). The documentation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48879
Branko Drevensek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||branko.drevensek at gmail dot
com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
Bug ID: 58816
Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE have tree_list in
private_is_attribute_p
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58729
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58804
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58818
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58818
Bug ID: 58818
Summary: parameters optimized out using -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gmail dot com ---
Sent from my iPad
> On Oct 21, 2013, at 2:35 AM, "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org"
> wrote:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58772
>
> Tobias Burnus changed:
>
> What|R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58816
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58810
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58809
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58442
--- Comment #8 from Martin Husemann ---
And apparently same cause:
ooops, bogus rtx mem attrs: 0x4
(subreg:SI (reg/v:DI 70 [ xtime ]) 4)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58812
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58817
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We do this transform in fold_builtin_alloca_with_align (), I'm not sure but
maybe it does not happen because 'a' escapes to f.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58729
--- Comment #15 from emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: emsr
Date: Mon Oct 21 13:52:39 2013
New Revision: 203893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203893&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-10-20 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
PR libs
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
