http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus ---
Still doesn't correctly work as the following code shows:
if (_F.DA0 == 0B)
_F.DA0 = left;
…
finally
{
if (left != 0B)
__builtin_free ((void *) left)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58438
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58471
Bug ID: 58471
Summary: ICE on invalid with missing type constructor and -Wall
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58470
Bug ID: 58470
Summary: ICE on invalid with FINAL function and type extension
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57697
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 18 22:19:03 2013
New Revision: 202725
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202725&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/57697
* gfortran.dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> Additionally, I wonder what the code should print - 20 or 42. With the
> current code (plus patch) and with crayftn it prints 20. (ifort and pgf95
> segfault.) I h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.3
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58469
Bug ID: 58469
Summary: Defined assignment: ICE, possible wrong value
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58451
--- Comment #2 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Should be already fixed by richi's r202644.
Verified (for 202680). Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58468
Bug ID: 58468
Summary: Macro gets undefined when source directory is same as
macro name.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58452
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:54:06 2013
New Revision: 202719
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202719&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Michael Meissner
PR target/58452
* config/rs600
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57444
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43366
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:14:57 2013
New Revision: 202713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202713&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-15 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/43366
* primary.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:13:15 2013
New Revision: 202712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202712&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-09-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58457
* class.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:11:46 2013
New Revision: 202711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202711&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-09-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/58457
* class.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58394
xperience at interia dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xperience at interia dot pl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:31:01 2013
New Revision: 202716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202716&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/58338
* include/bits/stl_iter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58438
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Wed Sep 18 18:24:49 2013
New Revision: 202714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202714&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/58438
* lr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55860
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The other issue here is the loop header which looks like:
bb4:
# iii_16 = PHI
# jkl_17 = PHI
L1:
if (m_8(D) > iii_16)
goto ;
else
goto ;
[... ]
bb7
# iii_12 = PHI <0(6), iii_10(5)>
# jkl_4 = PHI
L2:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58467
Bug ID: 58467
Summary: Documentation of the "used" variable attribute needs
additional information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #38 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Richard,
I've split up the patch as requested:
Part 1 was posted here, but not yet approved:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-09/msg01292.html
Just for the record, part 1 has been bootstrapped and r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58466
Bug ID: 58466
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in
cxx_eval_constant_expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Smolsky ---
I wonder if I just need to merge this:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=187978
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58462
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente ---
Thanks Jakub.
Downloaded the standard.
waiting for more examples of usage
It is a pity that it does not support c++ range loop
Let me highjack this bug to congratulate you and your collaborators for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58463
Bug ID: 58463
Summary: ICE with -fdump-tree-all-all in vector indexed access
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58465
Bug ID: 58465
Summary: TSan deadlock in a single-threaded program
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: sanitize
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58464
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev ---
Created attachment 30858
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30858&action=edit
Original preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58464
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev ---
Created attachment 30857
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30857&action=edit
Testcase (somewhat minimized). Compile with -O3.
GCC 20130331 (rev. 197291) - works, 20130526 (rev. 199345) -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58464
Bug ID: 58464
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Crashes with SIGSEGV (infinite
recursion in phi_translate)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #37 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 30854
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30854&action=edit
Testcase for both the assignment and read issues
For the record, this is a slightly extended original x86_64 tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57444
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in instantiate_type for |[4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
LIM does not move the invariant because it does not see that _7 in _7->key
is always dereferenced in the innermost loop. This is because LIM computes
this property as a basic-block property, not as a referen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58443
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58443
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Sep 18 13:31:34 2013
New Revision: 202701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Marek Polacek
PR sanitize/58443
cp/
* typeck.c (cp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58462
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
enable-lto -disable-libitm --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
--disable-libsanitizer
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.0 20130918 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Ah, so we have
_103 = fieldr.e[_51];
_104 = _102 * _103;
fieldr.e[_51] = _104;
_106 = fieldr.d[_51];
*dlo_107(D)[_51] = _106;
_109 = _104 / _106;
*eod_110(D)[_51] = _109;
and distribute it as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58417
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58417
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Sep 18 12:31:45 2013
New Revision: 202700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58417
* tree-c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> Does the benchmark fail if you build with -ftree-loop-distribution
> -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns? (it should emit a loop instead of the
> memcpy call)
o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Clang compiles the preprocessed source OK, so the problem may be in the
front-end not the library.
Commenting out the volatile and const volatile overloads of _Bind::operator()
allows the program to compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58461
--- Comment #1 from Matthew Fortune ---
Created attachment 30853
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30853&action=edit
Patch to enable LRA for mips16
elf --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-arch=mips32r2
--with-mips-plt --with-synci --with-llsc --with-newlib
target_alias=mips-sde-elf --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.9.0 20130918 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57899
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Reduced a bit more to only depend on std::bind
#include
using std::bind;
using std::placeholders::_1;
struct S { int i; };
struct P { S s; };
struct get_s
{
const S& operator()(const P& p) const { r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
loop distribution distributes this into
q2 = ( g2a(i+1) * g31a(i+1) * v1(i+1,j,k)
1- g2a(i ) * g31a(i ) * v1(i ,j,k) )
2 *
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55901
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58460
Bug ID: 58460
Summary: Error: shift amount out of range 0 to 4 at operand 3
-- `sub sp,x1,x0,lsl 9'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Value-numbering it is (-good +bad):
-Value numbering _29 stmt = _29 = _7->key;
+Value numbering _29 stmt = _29 = MEM[(struct S *)&a][j_40].key;
Setting value number of _29 to _29
...
Value numbering _18 st
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58338
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
Author: glisse
Date: Wed Sep 18 11:21:51 2013
New Revision: 202699
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Marc Glisse
PR libstdc++/58338
* include/bits/list.tcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
It is actually different behavior of PRE and not LIM doing the invariant
motion.
So it should reproduce with -O2 already (maybe you can double-check that).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 18 11:08:02 2013
New Revision: 202698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Daniel Morris
Paolo Carlini
PR c++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 18 11:07:16 2013
New Revision: 202697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Daniel Morris
Paolo Carlini
PR c++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Sep 18 11:06:15 2013
New Revision: 202696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Daniel Morris
Paolo Carlini
PR c++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58264
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 18 10:55:36 2013
New Revision: 202695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/58264
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Attribute_to_gnu): Define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
--- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 30850
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30850&action=edit
test-case to reproduce
Test must be compiled on x86 with options -Ofast -m332 -march=atom -mtune=atom
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58264
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Sep 18 10:51:43 2013
New Revision: 202694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202694&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/58264
* gcc-interface/trans.c (Attribute_to_gnu): Define
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58459
Bug ID: 58459
Summary: [4.9 regression] Loop invariant is not hoisted out of
loop after r202525.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.5 |4.7.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation, patch
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58458
Bug ID: 58458
Summary: ISO 14882 typo in docs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47059
Denis Vlasenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vda.linux at googlemail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58411
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Sep 18 10:01:40 2013
New Revision: 202682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202682&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-18 Marek Polacek
PR sanitizer/58411
* doc/extend.texi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Note the testcase has to use __SIZE_TYPE__ instead of unsigned int.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53324
dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 30848
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30848&action=edit
phiopt pass for -Og
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysrumyan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58444
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58454
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Which means - don't hold your breath ;) This one isn't easy to fix without
sacrifying what -Og is supposed to provide.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58447
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58451
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58457
Bug ID: 58457
Summary: ICE when placement new operator is used with using
keyword and custom constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58442
--- Comment #3 from Martin Husemann ---
0x92c9fc :movab 0xff60(sp),sp
0x92ca01 :
movab *0xef3cfc <_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+1548>,0xffd8(fp)
0x92ca09 : movl 0x4(ap),r0
0x92ca0d : movl 0x4(r0),0xf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58456
Bug ID: 58456
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/slsr-39.c scan-tree-dump-times
slsr "MEM" 4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58332
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58455
--- Comment #2 from Roland Dreier ---
Arg, I don't seem to be able to avoid breaking my test cases while minimizing
them. So for my first test case here the issue seems to be that -Og is the
only level that *correctly* warns, which is surprising
95 matches
Mail list logo
