http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54080
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Gabriel Dos Reis from comment #9)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> > note that the patch at:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01460.html
> >
> > is not quite enou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
Bug ID: 58285
Summary: ICE in lto_output_tree, at lto-streamer-out.c:1318
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58286
Bug ID: 58286
Summary: Need option to make incompatible pointer types into
compiler errors
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58285
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58148
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Compare with this on amd64:
>
> > c++ -o plain.s -S conftest.cc
> > c++ -o shared.s -fPIC -shared -S conftest.cc
> > diff -u plain.s shared.s
> --- plain.s 2013-08-30 21:46:18.0 +0200
> +++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58148
--- Comment #3 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Fri Aug 30 20:55:37 2013
New Revision: 202121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202121&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-30 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/58148
* include/debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58091
Thomas Braun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.braun@virtuell-zuhau
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58191
--- Comment #9 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Fri Aug 30 20:16:03 2013
New Revision: 202119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202119&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-30 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/58191
* include/debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
--- Comment #2 from Martin Husemann ---
Compare with this on amd64:
> c++ -o plain.s -S conftest.cc
> c++ -o shared.s -fPIC -shared -S conftest.cc
> diff -u plain.s shared.s
--- plain.s 2013-08-30 21:46:18.0 +0200
+++ shared.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
svn revision 202105
Configured with: src/gcc-mainline/configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --enable-threads
--disable-libmudflap --disable-lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou ---
> "grep -R -static-libstdc++ gcc/ada" suggests that -static-libstdc++ only
> appears in a Changelog entry.
>
> also the gcc driver silently ignores -static-libstdc++.
>
> certainly, the -B options are passe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
Bug ID: 58282
Summary: g++.dg/tm/noexcept-1.C -fno-exceptions SIGSEGV in
gimple_build_eh_must_not_throw
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58178
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Aug 30 15:39:01 2013
New Revision: 202110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202110&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2013-08-30 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/51424
* cp-tree.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
--- Comment #11 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Fixed for 4.8+ so far, thanks for reporting it.
Thanks Jakub. Wow, that's quick! You folks are wonderful.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor ---
Created attachment 30732
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30732&action=edit
Another attempt at a fix
I simply moved the decision whether to go the misalignp path or not a
bit down in the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
also reproduces with x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58284
Bug ID: 58284
Summary: Compiling jvgenmain failes with lots of "undefined
reference" errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58282
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It seems terminate_node is NULL
...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x08707b50 in gimple_build_eh_must_not_throw (decl=0x0) at
/home/vries/local/fsf_gcc_mainline_arm_none_linux_g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58283
Bug ID: 58283
Summary: Incorrect debug info when precompilation is on
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
--- Comment #12 from Gabriel Dos Reis ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10)
> also the gcc driver silently ignores -static-libstdc++.
Isn't this the problem?
> certainly, the -B options are passed when other gcc components are built (o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
--- Comment #9 from Gabriel Dos Reis ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> note that the patch at:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01460.html
>
> is not quite enough to fix this on Darwin - since we use :
>
> %{stati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58280
--- Comment #5 from Freddie Witherden ---
Thank you for this information. As an alternative would it be worth
considering a pragma along the lines of:
#pragma gcc aligned(32)
which would confer that "in the first iteration of the loop which fol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58281
Bug ID: 58281
Summary: Problem with explicit constexpr template functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
--- Comment #12 from André Wöbbeking ---
Does anyone look into this? The warnings are really annoying.
FYI, Clang 3.3 doesn't warn about this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] wrong code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 30 12:53:47 2013
New Revision: 202105
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58277
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (strlen_enter_block):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58280
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
We have a way to say assume something,
if (ldim % 32 != 0) __builtin_unreachable (), and you can define a __assume
macro using it.
But, as we don't record the non-zero bitmasks from it anywhere, it can't be
us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58280
--- Comment #3 from Freddie Witherden ---
Would it be any easier --- from an implementation standpoint --- to adopt
something similar to the "__assume(predicate)" directive in ICC? This would
allow one to state explicitly:
__assume(ldim % 32 ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 30 12:41:17 2013
New Revision: 202104
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202104&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58277
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (strlen_enter_block):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58280
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> We still don't preserve VRP info (patches exist) and furthermore, don't
> record non-zero bits bitmask there either. Only after we do that we could
> perhaps han
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58280
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58280
Bug ID: 58280
Summary: Missed Opportunity for Aligned Vectorized Load
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14932
zhangjingwang at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zhangjingwang at gmail dot
I have a fix which I hope to share in the next few weeks.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:31 AM, "evstupac at gmail dot com"
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
>
> --- Comment #2 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
> I can't share CoreMark sources.
> However, you can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com ---
I have a fix which I hope to share in the next few weeks.
Sent from my iPad
On Aug 30, 2013, at 3:31 AM, "evstupac at gmail dot com"
wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
--- Comment #2 from Stupachenko Evgeny ---
I can't share CoreMark sources.
However, you can get them at www.coremark.org when accept the license.
The error caused by edge->count of new edges which is grater than max_count:
(line 902)
gcc_assert (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58231
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58279
Bug ID: 58279
Summary: Interanl compiler error while pgo compilation at
ipa-inline.c:902
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58278
Bug ID: 58278
Summary: visibility bug from #26905 still happens with the
sparc64 backend
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
But, skimming through the dumps, it looks like it is the strlen pass that
removes the important n = 0; store.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57592
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57393
--- Comment #32 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 58247 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58247
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58246
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Target Milestone|4.8.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 30 07:49:54 2013
New Revision: 202097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58228
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58223
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 30 07:48:53 2013
New Revision: 202096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58223
* tree-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58010
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 30 07:47:54 2013
New Revision: 202095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202095&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-30 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/58010
* tree-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58277
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
62 matches
Mail list logo
