http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57849
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57784
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57823
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23383
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern dot
ch
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
--- Comment #1 from Dongsheng Song ---
x86_64-w64-mingw32 failed with same errors:
$ make all-am
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/cauchy/obj/x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc49/mingw-w64-crt'
x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I/home/cauchy/vcs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57847
--- Comment #2 from lxz at knd dot com.cn ---
I am using codesourcery and linaro compiler.
lxz@cdserver:~$ arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=arm-none-eabi-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/arm/eabi/bin/../libexec/gcc/arm-none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57849
Bug ID: 57849
Summary: With Convention => C causes Bug box with -gnat2012
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Severity|blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57848
Bug ID: 57848
Summary: internal compiler error on build with mingw-w64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57847
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I have used GCC 4.7.0 with Linux 3.10 with the SLUB allocator and it works just
fine.
Can you provide the exact options you configured GCC with?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57847
Bug ID: 57847
Summary: Compile ARM linux kernel with configuration of SLUB
allocator, kernel failed to boot
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57846
Bug ID: 57846
Summary: CRTP, templates, metaprogramming, forwarding and
static member
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845
Bug ID: 57845
Summary: ICE with -freg-struct-return on Sparc target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57722
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2008/03/the-first-rule-of-programming-its-always-your-fault.html
select isn't broken, neither is 'for'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56977
Bastiaan Jacques changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bastiaan at bjacques dot org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57844
Bug ID: 57844
Summary: avr-unknown-elf libstdc++v3 build causes internal
compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54310
--- Comment #1 from Nathan Ridge ---
Richard Smith has suggested that GCC is actually allowed not to instantiate
'meta' as per [temp.inst]/p6:
"If the overload resolution process can determine the correct function to call
without instantiating a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57843
Bug ID: 57843
Summary: Polymorphic assignment for derived type is resolved
with parent's generic instead of its own
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
--- Comment #2 from Anthony Brown
---
I see the problem with my code. There is no bug. The second if should be
else if. Sorry.
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 12:15 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57842
Bug ID: 57842
Summary: for statement not terminating properly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
Alexander Livenets changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux
Host|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What binutils version?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54588
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5)
> But in this specific case, how can the type of VeryComplicatedType change
> anything about the convertibility of A<...> to 'int'? Sorry if I lack
> imagination
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54588
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
>
> or maybe it does. I'd be very careful about removing information from the
> diagnostics. I find cases where we are missing information (PR53822 for
I didn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #11 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Created attachment 30474
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30474&action=edit
Patch that fixes all testcases added by me in previous patch to simple.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51786
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #10 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Created attachment 30473
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30473&action=edit
Patch to pretty printers testsuite to expose some problems
This patch adds into the testsuite additional cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to stevenb@gmail.com from comment #11)
> > --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> > I have tried to compile gcc.dg/comp-goto-1.c with the patched gcc, but
> > compilation failed with:
>
> Huh, wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #11 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com ---
> --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
> I have tried to compile gcc.dg/comp-goto-1.c with the patched gcc, but
> compilation failed with:
Huh, worked for me. What revision, what compiler opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57839
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Bur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57839
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54531
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57841
Bug ID: 57841
Summary: Assembler error on gcc for ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57763
--- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000120345388 in fixup_reorder_chain () at
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/cfgrtl.c:3436
3436 if (BB_HEADER (bb))
(gdb) bt
#0 0x000120345388 in fi
39 matches
Mail list logo
