[Bug testsuite/57591] gcc-4.8 libbacktrace btest failure on Linux ppc64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57591 --- Comment #1 from acrux --- same failure with gcc-4.8-20130620 and gcc-4.8-20130627

[Bug c++/57817] New: g++ crashes on handling variadic template sizeof inside lambda funcion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57817 Bug ID: 57817 Summary: g++ crashes on handling variadic template sizeof inside lambda funcion Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57814] gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-* test failures for eabi targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57814 --- Comment #2 from Janis Johnson --- I filed http://gcc.gnu.org/PR57816 for the ICE mentioned above.

[Bug target/57816] New: ICE compiling __builtin_sqrt with powerpc-none-eabispe with -mpowerpc-gpopt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57816 Bug ID: 57816 Summary: ICE compiling __builtin_sqrt with powerpc-none-eabispe with -mpowerpc-gpopt Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug c++/57815] New: [c++11] Error spew on misspelled initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57815 Bug ID: 57815 Summary: [c++11] Error spew on misspelled initializer lists Product: gcc Version: 4.7.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/29776] result of ffs/clz/ctz/popcount/parity are already sign-extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776 --- Comment #7 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com --- Wait, sorry, someone's already pointed that out. Ignore me, then... I can at least confirm it still happens with GCC 4.8.1.

[Bug target/29776] result of ffs/clz/ctz/popcount/parity are already sign-extended

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776 sgunderson at bigfoot dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sgunderson at bigfoot dot c

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Daniel Oertwig from comment #8) > Ok, so: Is this behaviour "part" of the language or a bug in gcc? > I could not find any documentation specifying that a sequence point should > be inbetwee

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Oertwig --- Ok, so: Is this behaviour "part" of the language or a bug in gcc? I could not find any documentation specifying that a sequence point should be inbetween the (side-effect) evaluation of the function call and

[Bug target/57814] gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-* test failures for eabi targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57814 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, janis at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Several of the tests added for PR46728 fail for powerpc-none-eabi and > powerpc-none-eabispe. The tests all use -mpowerpc-gpopt; is that

[Bug target/57814] New: gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-* test failures for eabi targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57814 Bug ID: 57814 Summary: gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-* test failures for eabi targets Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug c++/57793] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with bitfields in get_bit_range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57793 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug middle-end/57809] Wasted work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Oertwig --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > taskInfo.ready[priority]->wakeTime = Task_enforceTimeslice(priority); > > This is the same as: > (*taskInfo.ready[priority]).wakeTime = Task_enforceT

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 Daniel Oertwig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 --- Comment #4 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- I have updated the patch for snapshot 4.9-20130630. If Gerald Pfeifer agrees to create a copy of freebsd-stdint.h and to keep the copyright line as is, then this could be done easily by someone with commit

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 Kai-Uwe Eckhardt changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23752|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Oertwig --- Oh, I am compiling with: CFLAGS := CFLAGS += -Os CFLAGS += -funsigned-char CFLAGS += -funsigned-bitfields CFLAGS += -fpack-struct CFLAGS += -fshort-enums CFLAGS += -ffreestanding CFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra CFL

[Bug c/57813] Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Oertwig --- Created attachment 30451 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30451&action=edit Disassembly of the relating parts (from *.elf file, i.e. after linking)

[Bug c/57813] New: Change of global variable ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57813 Bug ID: 57813 Summary: Change of global variable ignored Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c Assig

[Bug middle-end/57809] Wasted work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 --- Comment #5 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30449 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30449&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 5252

[Bug middle-end/57809] Wasted work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 --- Comment #4 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30448 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30448&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 4907

[Bug middle-end/57809] Wasted work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 --- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30447 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30447&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 4856

[Bug middle-end/57809] Wasted work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 --- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30446 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30446&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 2594

[Bug middle-end/57811] Wasted work in find_reloads()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811 --- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30445 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30445&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 4641

[Bug middle-end/57811] Wasted work in find_reloads()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811 --- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30444 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30444&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 3324

[Bug rtl-optimization/57812] Wasted work in computed_jump_p()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812 --- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30443 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30443&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug target/57777] [4.7 Regression] Python module fails compilation with "-march=core-avx2 -O3"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]|[4.7 Regression] Python

[Bug middle-end/57811] Wasted work in find_reloads()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30442 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30442&action=edit Suggested patch for loop at line 3324

[Bug c++/57771] g++ misinterprets >> in static_cast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57771 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/57812] Wasted work in computed_jump_p()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30441 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30441&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/57810] Wasted work in validate_const_int()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30440 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30440&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug middle-end/57806] Wasted work in propagate_nothrow()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30439 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30439&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug middle-end/57805] Wasted work in write_roots()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30438 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30438&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug fortran/57804] Waste work in gfc_trans_transfer()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30437 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30437&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug fortran/57803] Wasted work in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30436 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30436&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug fortran/57802] Wasted work in set_loop_bounds()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30435 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30435&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug fortran/57801] Wasted work in resolve_variable()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57801 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30434 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30434&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug fortran/57800] Wasted work in gfc_match_call()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57800 --- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang --- Created attachment 30433 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30433&action=edit Suggested patch

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 --- Comment #2 from Earnie --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > (In reply to Earnie from comment #0) > > --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx > > You know this doesn't work for GCC 4.8, right? No, I wasn't aware of it. I copied it

[Bug c++/12567] [Core/253] g++ fails to recognize ill-formed-ness of initializers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12567 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |SUSPENDED Summary|g++ fails to

[Bug libstdc++/57779] vector insert fails to diagnose iterators pointing into *this in debug mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57779 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frs.dumont at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug rtl-optimization/57812] New: Waste work in computed_jump_p()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812 Bug ID: 57812 Summary: Waste work in computed_jump_p() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug middle-end/57811] New: Waste work in find_reloads()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811 Bug ID: 57811 Summary: Waste work in find_reloads() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/57809] Waste work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- I think you mean "wasted"

[Bug rtl-optimization/57810] New: Waste work in validate_const_int()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810 Bug ID: 57810 Summary: Waste work in validate_const_int() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimizatio

[Bug middle-end/57809] New: Waste work in omega_eliminate_red()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809 Bug ID: 57809 Summary: Waste work in omega_eliminate_red() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug libstdc++/57808] operators == and != for regex_token_iterator need to be const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57808 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/57808] New: operators == and != for regex_token_iterator need to be const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57808 Bug ID: 57808 Summary: operators == and != for regex_token_iterator need to be const Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/57807] New: Compile failure with __builtin_ia32_unpcklpd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57807 Bug ID: 57807 Summary: Compile failure with __builtin_ia32_unpcklpd Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targe

[Bug middle-end/57806] New: Waste work in propagate_nothrow()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806 Bug ID: 57806 Summary: Waste work in propagate_nothrow() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/57805] New: Waste work in write_roots()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805 Bug ID: 57805 Summary: Waste work in write_roots() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end A

[Bug fortran/57804] New: Waste work in gfc_trans_transfer()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804 Bug ID: 57804 Summary: Waste work in gfc_trans_transfer() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug middle-end/57803] New: Waste work in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803 Bug ID: 57803 Summary: Waste work in gfc_build_dummy_array_decl() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-

[Bug target/57748] ICE on ARM with -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neo

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748 philb at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philb at gnu dot org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/57802] New: Waste work in set_loop_bounds()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802 Bug ID: 57802 Summary: Waste work in set_loop_bounds() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/57801] New: Waste work in resolve_variable()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57801 Bug ID: 57801 Summary: Waste work in resolve_variable() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/57800] New: Waste work in gfc_match_call()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57800 Bug ID: 57800 Summary: Waste work in gfc_match_call() Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran A

[Bug java/57799] New: ICE in jcf-parse.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57799 Bug ID: 57799 Summary: ICE in jcf-parse.c Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: java Assignee: unassi

[Bug middle-end/55030] [4.8 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memcpy-chk.c execution, -Os (et al)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55030 --- Comment #19 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #18) > Let's just reapply r192676 on the mainline. We just need to make sure that > the failures on i686 don't reappear. Done now less than half a year later! (J

[Bug target/57777] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Python module fails compilation with "-march=core-avx2 -O3"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 --- Comment #9 from Julian Ospald --- patch tested with gcc-4.9.0_alpha20130505, works as well

[Bug target/57363] IBM long double: adding NaN and number raises inexact exception

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57363 --- Comment #2 from Adhemerval Zanella --- You are correct and I meant in my first comment QNaN for the NaN work. And I believe the patch is still correct: for IBM long double SNaN will be represented by first double being the NaN (the second doub

[Bug fortran/57798] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Incorrect handling of sum over first dimension of a product of automatic arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57798 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/57797] configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |bootstrap --- Comment #1 from Jonathan

[Bug fortran/57798] New: Incorrect handling of sum over first dimension of a product of automatic arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57798 Bug ID: 57798 Summary: Incorrect handling of sum over first dimension of a product of automatic arrays Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/57775] default argument for template parameter error for friend definition in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57775 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug other/57797] New: configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57797 Bug ID: 57797 Summary: configure --enable-languages=c builds libstdc++-v3 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/57785] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] DOT_PRODUCT error with constant complex array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57785 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug c++/12333] [DR 272] Explicit call to MyClass::~MyClass() not allowed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12333 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/56037] Spurious syntax error triggered before ambiguity resolution of type-id

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56037 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini --- Reduced: struct T { T(int, int); }; int main() { static const int zero = 0; (T(int(zero), int(zero))); }

[Bug tree-optimization/57796] AVX2 gather vectorization: code bloat and reduction of performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/57794] using keyword for function alias doesn't work with plus suffix return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57794 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/50789] Gather vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789 --- Comment #13 from vincenzo Innocente --- I just submitted a specific bug-report as PR57796

[Bug c++/57794] using keyword for function alias doesn't work with plus suffix return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57794 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57793] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE wiith bitfields in get_bit_range

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57793 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/57786] Waste work in distribute_notes()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57786 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ebotcazou at

[Bug middle-end/57786] Waste work in distribute_notes()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57786 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/57796] New: AVX2 gather vectorization: code bloat and reduction of performance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57796 Bug ID: 57796 Summary: AVX2 gather vectorization: code bloat and reduction of performance Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/57772] Bug box in gnat_to_gnu, at ada/gcc-interface/trans.c:5778 on legal Ada 2005 quantifier expression with exponentiation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57772 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/57795] New: Fail cross building Ada

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57795 Bug ID: 57795 Summary: Fail cross building Ada Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/56982] [4.8 Regression] Bad optimization with setjmp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56982 --- Comment #15 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #14) > Your example is invalid C. Referring to WG14 n1494.pdf (there may be more > recent C1x documents, but it's the one I had available right now): > > - you v