http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #26 from Tobias Burnus ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Jun 21 21:51:41 2013
New Revision: 200321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=200321&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-06-21 Tobias Burnus
* trans-array.c (gfc_trans_deferred_a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53317
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57672
Bug ID: 57672
Summary: va_list fixinclude needed for AIX 5.3 sys/types.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
I can have a look at it, but it might take a month or so until I get back to
this issue.
If I understand correctly, bottom line of what you need is that avr-gcc does
not warn for ISR names that are not of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41437
Shane changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w.shane.grant at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57658
--- Comment #3 from Takaki Makino ---
Created attachment 30336
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30336&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Hi Paolo,
Thank you for referring to the useful resource.
Using these tools I've got a reduced v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
pebbles at riseup dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pebbles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> As the reporter of this enhancement request, I think it is something
> that should be left open.
>
> Low priority, but this was a 'feature' of some f77 compilers in the past.
G77 does compile the t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669
--- Comment #3 from Oliver Stoeneberg ---
It's unoptimized code and using -msse -mfpmath=sse fixes it.
But there is another fix:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/7t5yh4fd(v=vs.110).aspx
Changing
autoc[coeff] += d * data[sample+co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #8 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #7)
> (In reply to pebbles from comment #6)
>
> > This seems like a very small patch that makes GCC more extendable and
> > accurate. I am not too attach
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7957
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benoit.hudson at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57671
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669
Julian Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jtaylor.debian at gmail dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #6 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
You seem to be speaking from an assumption that this warning code should not
change. Is there a reason for not adding this small patch, which makes gcc
more extendable and accurate?
(In reply to G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57671
Bug ID: 57671
Summary: Compile Error: When declared a pointer const TYPE
const *p ; (p is name of pointer)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17166
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57670
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57670
Bug ID: 57670
Summary: Member-pointer calls should not be redirected to
builtin_unreachable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667
--- Comment #3 from Evgeny Gavrin ---
Command to run:
egavrin@debian:~/dev/vd-issues/ld-memory-consumption/gcc-tests$ gcc-4.7 test.c
-O0 -g2 -gdwarf-2 -femit-struct-debug-detailed=ind:ord:base
egavrin@debian:~/dev/vd-issues/ld-memory-consumption/g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to pebbles from comment #4)
> (In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
>> Would you explain what you are trying to achieve?
>
> For one thing, I'm coding in C++, so the handlers may be mang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #28 from Martin Liška ---
Gdb instruction dump of ScDocument::CalcAll, place where SIGSEGV was received
is marked with '>', address: 0x2aaab390c19d
+
B+ ¦0x2aaab390c180 <_ZN10ScDocument7CalcAllEv> push %r15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #20 from Martin Liška ---
Link to ltrans16.cgraph dump:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0pisUJ80pO1c0JTTmR5Z1pQb28/edit?usp=sharing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34928
--- Comment #5 from Bud Davis ---
As the reporter of this enhancement request, I think it is something that
should be left open.
Low priority, but this was a 'feature' of some f77 compilers in the past.
Even if no-one ever adds this functional
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
chrome.wpa.000i.cgraph:
_ZN3net12_GLOBAL__N_113DnsTCPAttempt12OnIOCompleteEi/8859591 (OnIOComplete)
@0x7f80e10be980
Type: function definition analyzed
Visibility: force_output prevailing_def_ironly
Addres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
What about trying ulimit -m to increase the number of FDs? (it requires root)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #27 from Jan Hubicka ---
It is difficult to say why the unit test fails. Would be possible to run it in
GDB and figure out why it segfaults?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57669
Bug ID: 57669
Summary: Incorrect floating point values with 32-bit compile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
--- Comment #4 from pebbles at riseup dot net ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #3)
> Would you explain what you are trying to achieve?
For one thing, I'm coding in C++, so the handlers may be mangled to the wrong
symbols unless I tel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52773
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Bernd Schmidt has posted a patch for review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg01147.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57631
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57668
--- Comment #1 from Ondrej Bilka ---
Created attachment 30333
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30333&action=edit
benchmark for memcpy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57668
Bug ID: 57668
Summary: Regression in vectorizing memcpy pattern.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57664
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Can't really bisect it further due to autoconf version, but it started between
186994 and 187108.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666
--- Comment #3 from thunderliu at gmail dot com ---
Sorry I missed that. But the remaining (which is the point of this bug) still
stands.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to thunderliu from comment #0)
> > Non-member opera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57637
--- Comment #5 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> Please try the attached patch. If it works, I will send it for community
> review.
Hi Zhenqiang,
This seems to fix the miscompare on my setup, thanks!
I haven't ran a full regression test on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to thunderliu from comment #0)
> Non-member operators for valarray<> returns instance of _Expr<> (lazy
> evaluation?), instead of another valarray<>. This is non-conforming but
> probably not a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667
--- Comment #2 from Evgeny Gavrin ---
Hi!
>From the documentation to -femit-struct-debug-detailed:
"The value `base' means that the base of name of the file in which the type
declaration appears must match the base of the name of the main compila
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57401
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667
--- Comment #1 from Evgeny Gavrin ---
Created attachment 30332
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30332&action=edit
structs declaration
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038
--- Comment #26 from Martin Liška ---
Unit tests error:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x2aaab39189ed in ScDocument::CalcAll() () from
/ssd/libreoffice/solver/unxlngx6.pro/lib/libsclo.so
(gdb) bt
#0 0x2aaab39189ed i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57667
Bug ID: 57667
Summary: -femit-struct-debug-detailed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57408
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|superbem at gmail dot com |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666
thunderliu at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-redhat-linux
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57666
Bug ID: 57666
Summary: valarray::operator= in c++11 mode does not adapt to
size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53211
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57659
--- Comment #2 from Ellis N. Thomas
---
Oops...re-used a previous report as a template!
Pls take (sub)sections 6 as 5.
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Ellis N. Thomas from comment #0)
> > 4 Information about the buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
1) You didn't attach a testcase
2) GCC 4.3 is unsupported and unmaintained
3) You have the wrong number of underscores:
#define GCC_VERSION #__GNUC__ "." #___GNUC_MINOR__ "." #__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Is there any chance that someone has a look to this bug?
No, but you can do it yourself.
> I did not test all gcc/gfortran versions, so I am 100% sure that
> this a 4.6-only issue. Furthermore, id
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57665
Bug ID: 57665
Summary: cpp: stringification does not work for __GNUC__
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57663
--- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bardeau ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #1)
> (In reply to Sebastien Bardeau from comment #0)
> > It seems that the gcc 4.6 branch is still receiving bug fixes, so could you
> > have a look?
> >
> Unfotuna
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57664
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
62 matches
Mail list logo
