Dear gcc-bugs,
We just develop new device special for library book distributors.
If you don't know where to find new products and how to make profits,
Pls contact us for your interesting immediately.
visit site at
http://www.emetal.tw/protect/MF001.htm for library cleaner
and http://www.emetal.t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57502
Bug ID: 57502
Summary: Expected error "Declaration doesn't declare anything",
but code compiles fine for user-defined class with
using decltype, but not with built-in types.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57501
Bug ID: 57501
Summary: [avr] generated collect2 crttn24a.o missing path with
-mmcu=attiny24a
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57217
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #25 from David Abdurachmanov
---
I downloaded GCC 4.8.1 (final) and binutils 2.23.1 (default ld.gold). The
problem is that boost and a lot other C/C++ packages are not compiled w/ ASan.
One way would be to guarantee every single C/C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn ---
The failure occurs with or without -O1/-O2. I am invoking cc1plus with
-g -std=gnu++0x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
Unoptimized backtrace:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x1056d054 in _ZN7va_heap7reserveIP7ipa_refEEvRP3vecIT_S_8vl_embedEjb (
v=@0x24: 0x0, reserve=1, exact=false) at /nasfarm/dje/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 30240
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30240&action=edit
preprocessed testsuite/20_util/allocator_traits/members/construct.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57500
Bug ID: 57500
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Segfault in ipa_record_reference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57415
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn ---
Yes, the patch seems to fix the testsuite failure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
The submitted patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-06/msg5.html
actually solves the problem for REAL(16).
NOTE: I forgot to change one "isfinite" to "ISFINITE" in OUTPUT_FLOAT_FMT_G.
* * *
Pre-re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57467
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57366
--- Comment #15 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Fixed on darwin at revision 199583.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Charles L. Wilcox from comment #3)
> Signaling NaN for type "f" in hex is "7fe0".
I agree, this one doesn't look right to me, because that looks indeed like a
valid qNaN bit pattern only.
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57366
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
the problems with weakref are bit deeper than I though. They way RTL rewriting
is done
breaks completely with any symbol renaming that is quite common with LTO. I am
testing
the following
Index: cgraphun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484
--- Comment #3 from Charles L. Wilcox ---
Daniel,
Unfortunately, my initial machine, a laptop, decided to commit seppuku
yesterday.
Fortunately, the disk survived, I ported the code to another machine I have,
and am still seeing similar results
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57484
Charles L. Wilcox changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #30234|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19831
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.2 |4.9.0
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57492
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Another thing to optimize would be to change
a*builtin_pow(2.0,i) to ldexp(a, i).
Lots of fun things to do ;-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57479
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I can't reproduce the ICE with gcc-4.7.3 hosted on x86_64-linux configured as a
cross to either armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi or armv7l-unknown-eabi.
How was your gcc configured?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57489
--- Comment #8 from Jim Hand ---
Do you not agree that the compiler is not handling this situation in a very
helpful manner? A warning at minimal would be helpful, but when there is code
that equivalently says the following and prints identical va
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57442
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57499
Bug ID: 57499
Summary: ICE when noreturn destructor returns after throw with
-O
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57498
Bug ID: 57498
Summary: rethrow_exception causes segfault when another
exception is active and catch present
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> + sign_bit = SIGNBIT (x,tmp);\
> + if (!ISFINITE (x,tmp))\
> + write_infnan (dtp, f, ISNAN (x,tmp), sign_bit);\
I was too hasty: It should b
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: antoine.balestrat at gmail dot com
Hello !
The following testcase makes GCC 4.9.0 as of 20130601 ICE at -O3.
$ cat lra.c
int a, b;
void f(void)
{
for(;; a++)
if(0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496
Bug ID: 57496
Summary: I/O: WRITE(*,*) HUGE(0_16) [REAL(10)+REAL(16)]: Gives
SIGFPE with -ffpe-trap=overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57494
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57495
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||*-*-mingw*
CC|
32 matches
Mail list logo
