[Bug tree-optimization/57223] Auto-vectorization fails for nested multiple loops depending on type of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57223 --- Comment #2 from Sasanka Nagavalli 2013-05-09 05:11:28 UTC --- $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.7/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --wit

[Bug tree-optimization/57204] Auto-vectorization in nested loops with non-varying indexed array access results in very poor performance (worse than no auto-vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204 --- Comment #3 from Sasanka Nagavalli 2013-05-09 05:10:20 UTC --- Created attachment 30070 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30070 Test case 3 for issue 57204

[Bug tree-optimization/57223] Auto-vectorization fails for nested multiple loops depending on type of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57223 --- Comment #1 from Sasanka Nagavalli 2013-05-09 05:06:32 UTC --- Created attachment 30069 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30069 Test case for issue 57223 Adding a test case that demonstrates the issue for several types.

[Bug tree-optimization/57223] New: Auto-vectorization fails for nested multiple loops depending on type of array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57223 Bug #: 57223 Summary: Auto-vectorization fails for nested multiple loops depending on type of array Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: U

[Bug libgcc/57221] [4.8/4.9 regression] libgcc symbol visibility changes break Android blobs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221 --- Comment #3 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2013-05-09 00:51:15 UTC --- Created attachment 30068 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30068 Another patch This patch is needed as well to make sure Bionic can re-export __aeabi_lmul and

[Bug middle-end/19721] [meta-bug] optimizations that CSE still catches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19721 --- Comment #26 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2013-05-09 00:32:28 UTC --- The tree optimizers have become extremely aggressive on constant propagation, so cse is needed more than ever to undo the damage. With TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P rejecting (

[Bug c++/57222] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Template alias not working in argument of template class template method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57222 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1 Summary|Template alias n

[Bug c++/57222] Template alias not working in argument of template class template method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57222 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #12 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-05-09 00:20:01 UTC --- Note that I didn't include the fix from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571533 yet as I first want to make sure that this fix is still needed after the upgrade. I will

[Bug tree-optimization/57204] Auto-vectorization in nested loops with non-varying indexed array access results in very poor performance (worse than no auto-vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204 --- Comment #2 from Sasanka Nagavalli 2013-05-09 00:19:50 UTC --- Created attachment 30067 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30067 Test case 2 for issue 57204 The original test and description are slightly misleading because th

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #11 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-05-09 00:17:17 UTC --- Created attachment 30066 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30066 GCC extension for 4.4, v1 And the GCC extension itself.

[Bug c++/57222] New: Template alias not working in argument of template class template method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57222 Bug #: 57222 Summary: Template alias not working in argument of template class template method Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #10 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-05-09 00:13:37 UTC --- Created attachment 30065 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30065 GCC patch for 4.4, v1 Here is the updated patch to work with GCC Bugzilla 4.4. It's similar to at

[Bug libgcc/57221] [4.8/4.9 regression] libgcc symbol visibility changes break Android blobs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard Rosenkränzer 2013-05-09 00:09:40 UTC --- I agree that the best fix would be to just rebuild the blobs to get rid of the problem -- but we don't have that option. Fixing it in Bionic is harder than it sounds because th

[Bug libgcc/57221] [4.8/4.9 regression] libgcc symbol visibility changes break Android blobs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-05-08 23:52:19 UTC --- This sounds more like a bug in Bionic rather than anything else. Why not fix it there?

[Bug libgcc/57221] New: [4.8/4.9 regression] libgcc symbol visibility changes break Android blobs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57221 Bug #: 57221 Summary: [4.8/4.9 regression] libgcc symbol visibility changes break Android blobs Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCON

[Bug libstdc++/57213] failed formatted input overwrites output value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57213 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/42979] OpenMP #pragma omp taskwait after a label is not permitted - should fail at compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42979 Geir Johansen changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.3 --- Comment #1 from Geir Johansen

[Bug c/45784] gcc OpenMP - error: invalid controlling predicate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45784 Geir Johansen changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.7.3 --- Comment #1 from Geir Johansen

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler 2013-05-08 21:41:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Well, you should us the nm tool to check for existance of a symbol. Grepping > for strings might lead you to wrong direction. My apologies, I had seen the

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2013-05-08 21:02:08 UTC --- Well, you should us the nm tool to check for existance of a symbol. Grepping for strings might lead you to wrong direction. I don't see anything obviously wrong on you temp-file. The on

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler 2013-05-08 20:25:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) The attached '-v' '-save-temps' output indicates version 4.9.0 20130505 (experimental) (x86_64-w64-mingw32), but I'm not sure whether this is reliable in this

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 --- Comment #6 from Paulo J. Matos 2013-05-08 20:20:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > This issue persists in HEAD, the submitted patch seems to have been > > forgotten. > > Ping, ping. > > Ping it on gcc-patches

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 --- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2013-05-08 20:04:56 UTC --- Fine, by which date this version was built? I am pretty curious to see that issue for 4.9 due I don't happen to see it on my box. Could you check, if libmingwex.a contains for you the symb

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Krügler 2013-05-08 19:56:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks for the litmus test, Kay. The result output I'm getting is: MinGW-W64 Runtime 3.0 (alpha - rev. 0) -00-00 so it seems this is indeed the version

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|ktietz70 at googlemail dot | |com

[Bug middle-end/57219] __builtin_isinf_sign source comments more restrictive than documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57219 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz70 at googlemail dot

[Bug libstdc++/57220] [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure --- Comment #1 from Daniel

[Bug libstdc++/57220] New: [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57220 Bug #: 57220 Summary: [mingw] Undefined reference to __mingw_strtod Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug other/57219] New: __builtin_isinf_sign source comments more restrictive than documentation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57219 Bug #: 57219 Summary: __builtin_isinf_sign source comments more restrictive than documentation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2013-05-08 18:56:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > This issue persists in HEAD, the submitted patch seems to have been forgotten. > Ping, ping. Ping it on gcc-patches, BZ is *not* the place for that!

[Bug tree-optimization/57218] New: Excessive inlining even at -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57218 Bug #: 57218 Summary: Excessive inlining even at -Os Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/57203] [4.9 Regression] verify_gimple failed after SLSR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57203 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt 2013-05-08 17:52:20 UTC --- I can't reproduce this with an x86_64 cross-compiler today, using r198713. Could you please verify this still fails natively with at least r198709? I hope the main SLSR bug fix has ta

[Bug fortran/57217] New: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression][OOP] Accepts invalid TBP overriding - lacking arguments check

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57217 Bug #: 57217 Summary: [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression][OOP] Accepts invalid TBP overriding - lacking arguments check Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug c/57216] New: error: definition in block 255 does not dominate use in block 252

gma-1.01-23 on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130508 on an AMD x86_64 box. The compiler said SDL_gfxPrimitives.c: In function 'ellipseColor': SDL_gfxPrimitives.c:2317:5: error: definition in block 255 does not dominate use in block 252 int ellipseColor(SDL_Surface * dst, Sint16 x, Sint16 y, Sint16

[Bug c++/57215] New: cc1plus causes possible glibc free corruption

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: dcb...@hotmail.com Created attachment 30060 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30060 C++ source code I just tried to compile the package efte-1.1-6 on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130508

[Bug libstdc++/57213] failed formatted input overwrites output value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57213 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-05-08 16:01:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > In C++ standard (C++03) I can see 22.2.2.1.2p1 [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]: > "If an error occurs, val is unchanged; otherwise it is set to the resulting

[Bug c/57214] ice: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in coalesce_partitions, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1194

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57214 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman 2013-05-08 15:56:42 UTC --- Created attachment 30059 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30059 C source code

[Bug c/57214] New: ice: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in coalesce_partitions, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1194

ust tried to compile the package dvdauthor-0.7.1-3 on gcc-4.9 trunk dated 20130508 on an AMD x86_64 box. The compiler said mpeg2desc.c:335:13: internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have integer_cst in coalesce_partitions, at tree-ssa-coalesce.c:1194 static void process_pack

[Bug libstdc++/57213] New: failed formatted input overwrites output value

.10/4.8.1/lto-wrapper Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10 Configured with: /export/home/sbn/src/gcc-4.8/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-4.8 --enable-languages=c,c++ --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --with-as=/opt/csw/bin/gas Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.1 20130508 (prerelease) (G

[Bug c++/51226] [c++0x] ICE with opaque enum and invalid template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51226 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-08 15:16:09 UTC --- Remember to regenerate Makefile.in.

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-08 15:11:53 UTC --- Thanks Kai, please commit the patch with an appropriate ChangeLog entry mainline and 4_8-branch. Please also send it to gcc-patches.

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-05-08 14:48:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > The --save-temps thing is interesting, but I guess I'm more interested in how > we can get the warning back. I can open up a different PR if people p

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 Chung-Ju Wu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jasonwucj at gmail dot com --- Comment #10

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 --- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-05-08 14:33:58 UTC --- The --save-temps thing is interesting, but I guess I'm more interested in how we can get the warning back. I can open up a different PR if people prefer.

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52235] rtlanal: commutative_operand_precedence should prioritize regs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52235 --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos 2013-05-08 14:24:08 UTC --- This issue persists in HEAD, the submitted patch seems to have been forgotten. Ping, ping.

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-05-08 14:23:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > the comment for function linemap_location_in_system_header_p > in libcpp/line-map.c says: > /* // snip >Note that this function returns 1 if LOCATI

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org Sever

[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 Diego Novillo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 Andoni changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30056|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/57212] Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 --- Comment #1 from Andoni 2013-05-08 13:40:46 UTC --- Created attachment 30056 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30056 Fix libstdc threads for mingw

[Bug libstdc++/57212] New: Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57212 Bug #: 57212 Summary: Don't use pe-coff weak support with mingw Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 --- Comment #7 from minux 2013-05-08 13:24:20 UTC --- the comment for function linemap_location_in_system_header_p in libcpp/line-map.c says: /* // snip Note that this function returns 1 if LOCATION belongs to a token that is part

[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 --- Comment #28 from dnovillo at google dot com 2013-05-08 13:23:22 UTC --- On 2013-05-08 06:05 , Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2013, Diego Novillo wrote: > >> On 2013-05-07 13:06 , roland at gnu dot org wrote: >>> http://gcc.gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/57206] Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an unsigned int expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 minux changed: What|Removed |Added CC||minux.ma at gmail dot com --- Comment #6 from mi

[Bug c/57209] Wrong code of print statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57209 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/57211] New: wrong line indicated in warning for synthesized method

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57211 Bug #: 57211 Summary: wrong line indicated in warning for synthesized method Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug middle-end/57192] [4.9 Regression] miscompilation at -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57192 --- Comment #12 from Joost VandeVondele 2013-05-08 13:03:59 UTC --- Reduced testcase that still triggers the valgrind warning during compilation: MODULE orbital_pointers INTEGER, DIMENSION(:,:), ALLOCATABLE :: soset CONTAINS SUBR

[Bug c++/56859] alignas() fails in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56859 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||damien.levac at gmail dot

[Bug c++/57210] Using alignas with an union does not compile.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57210 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-08 12:57:04 UTC --- Maybe you could refuse to do the update if nobody helps about that. Kidding ;)

[Bug tree-optimization/57199] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Bogus warning: iteration NNNN invokes undefined behavior -Waggressive-loop-optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57199 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|IN

[Bug c++/57210] New: Using alignas with an union does not compile.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57210 Bug #: 57210 Summary: Using alignas with an union does not compile. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #8 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-05-08 12:49:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Any chance we can take the occasion to restore the svn -> Bugzilla link, where > the former automatically sends the commit ChangeLogs to the audit trails?

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-08 12:42:47 UTC --- Any chance we can take the occasion to restore the svn -> Bugzilla link, where the former automatically sends the commit ChangeLogs to the audit trails?

[Bug c/57209] New: Wrong code of print statement

: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: ishiura-compi...@ml.kwansei.ac.jp The following code is miscompiled by GCC 4.8.1 20130508 (prerelease) for x86_64 (as well as for i686). The option in question is "-funsafe-math-optimiza

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO [4.8.1/4.9.0]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška 2013-05-08 12:32:51 UTC --- Created attachment 30055 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30055 common.gypi - build configuration

[Bug c++/57208] Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO [4.8.1/4.9.0]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška 2013-05-08 12:32:24 UTC --- Created attachment 30054 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30054 Savetemps dump

[Bug c++/57208] New: Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO [4.8.1/4.9.0]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57208 Bug #: 57208 Summary: Latest chromium compilation fails with enabled LTO [4.8.1/4.9.0] Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCO

[Bug c/57201] Using --save-temps affects whether warning is printed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57201 --- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-05-08 12:30:02 UTC --- Yes, it does issue a warning as expected with -Wsystem-headers.

[Bug c++/57206] Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an unsigned int expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-05-08 11:49:11 UTC --- I don't think this is a C++ front-end issue.

[Bug c++/57207] Incorrect lifetime of const references bound to temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207 --- Comment #3 from DimanNe 2013-05-08 11:44:17 UTC --- Ok, thanks for clarification.

[Bug web/52239] Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239 --- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-05-08 11:43:08 UTC --- I plan to upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 4.4 this week. Is there any objection or anything else that I should be aware of before doing the upgrade?

[Bug c++/57207] Incorrect lifetime of const references bound to temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug sanitizer/56630] gcc's address-sanitizer uses 75% more memory than clang's on simple testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56630 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug sanitizer/56628] "bootstrap-lto bootstrap-asan" / profiledbootstrap fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56628 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug c++/57207] Incorrect lifetime of const references bound to temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207 vlukas at gmx dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vlukas at gmx dot de ---

[Bug c/57205] for unfinished function declaration, recover by skipping until matched parenthesis and report non-matched parenthesis

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57205 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/57206] Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an unsigned int expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206 Sasanka Nagavalli changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/57207] New: Incorrect lifetime of const references bound to temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207 Bug #: 57207 Summary: Incorrect lifetime of const references bound to temporary Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/57206] Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an unsigned int expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206 --- Comment #1 from Sasanka Nagavalli 2013-05-08 10:51:24 UTC --- Created attachment 30052 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30052 Test case for issue 57206

[Bug c++/57206] New: Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an unsigned int expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57206 Bug #: 57206 Summary: Auto-vectorization fails when array index is an unsigned int expression Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Statu

[Bug c/57205] New: unfinished function declaration and inclusion of assert.h causes compiler errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57205 Bug #: 57205 Summary: unfinished function declaration and inclusion of assert.h causes compiler errors Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Statu

[Bug bootstrap/54659] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap with --disable-nls broken under Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de 2013-05-08 10:06:30 UTC --- On Tue, 7 May 2013, Diego Novillo wrote: > On 2013-05-07 13:06 , roland at gnu dot org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54659 > > > > ---

[Bug ada/57188] [4.9 regression] Ada bootstrap broken on Solaris/x64: No_Implicit_Dynamic_Code violation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57188 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug preprocessor/41590] No __STDC__ definition in -g3 -E output on STDC_0_IN_SYSTEM_HEADERS systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41590 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2013-05-08 09:17:11 UTC --- > --- Comment #1 from Shakthi Kannan 2013-05-08 > 07:05:37 UTC --- > Which version of GCC are you using? This even affects current mainline. > The abo

[Bug tree-optimization/57204] Auto-vectorization in nested loops with non-varying indexed array access results in very poor performance (worse than no auto-vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204 --- Comment #1 from Sasanka Nagavalli 2013-05-08 09:16:02 UTC --- Created attachment 30051 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30051 Test case for issue 57204 Attached a small test case to demonstrate the issue.

[Bug tree-optimization/57200] [4.8/4.9 Regression] aggressive-loop-optimizations notes appear even when warning itself is suppressed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57200 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Version|unkn

[Bug other/50345] Incomplete GCC Internals sentence on LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345 --- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos 2013-05-08 09:09:30 UTC --- Created attachment 30050 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30050 Patch with typo fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/57204] New: Auto-vectorization in nested loops with non-varying indexed array access results in very poor performance (worse than no auto-vectorization)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57204 Bug #: 57204 Summary: Auto-vectorization in nested loops with non-varying indexed array access results in very poor performance (worse than no auto-vectorization) Classific

[Bug tree-optimization/57200] [4.8/4.9 Regression] aggressive-loop-optimizations notes appear even when warning itself is suppressed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57200 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug rtl-optimization/57193] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for SSE registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.6 Target Milestone|---

[Bug other/50345] Incomplete GCC Internals sentence on LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50345 --- Comment #1 from Paulo J. Matos 2013-05-08 08:58:54 UTC --- I am revisiting this bug and it seems that there's just an extra work, nothing specially unexplained and the correct URL for the problem is: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccin

  1   2   >