[Bug target/54349] _mm_cvtsi128_si64 unnecessary stores value at stack

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54349 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Ganesh.Gopalasubramanian at

[Bug fortran/51825] Fortran runtime error: Cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-29 01:27:05 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Apr 29 01:25:43 2013 New Revision: 198386 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198386&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-28 Jerry DeLisle B

[Bug fortran/51825] Fortran runtime error: Cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-29 00:55:08 UTC --- Back port due to silent wrong code. Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Apr 29 00:52:23 2013 New Revision: 198385 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198385&root=gcc&view=rev Log

[Bug c++/56450] ICE with SFINAE when detecting non-static member variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56450 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #10 from synergye at codefi dot re 2013-04-28 22:20:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Any suggestions for > > troubleshooting this bug on my end? I've done a few toolchain builds and > > always

[Bug middle-end/57073] __builtin_powif (-1.0, k) should be optimized to "1.0 - 2.0 * (K%2)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-28 22:03:35 UTC --- Created attachment 29968 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29968 patch that fails The patch in the attachment fails with the test case program main i

[Bug fortran/57093] Seg fault on internal output to a character scalar coarray

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-28 21:19:26 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Apr 28 19:54:44 2013 New Revision: 198379 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198379&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-28 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/39290] Subroutine/function ambiguity in generics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39290 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/57106] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fschedule-insns -funroll-all-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57106 Bug #: 57106 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O2 -fschedule-insns -funroll-all-loops Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-28 18:08:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Any suggestions for > troubleshooting this bug on my end? I've done a few toolchain builds and > always > run into this segfault as do others.

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #8 from synergye at codefi dot re 2013-04-28 17:51:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I can't reproduce the ICE with 4.9 r198366 configured as a cross to > armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi, on either x86_64-linux or i686-linux, or

[Bug rtl-optimization/57105] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE: in add_insn_before_nobb, at emit-rtl.c:3883 with -Os -fselective-scheduling2 -g

-198366-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130428 (experimental) (GCC) Tested revisions: r198366 - crash 4.8 r198018 - OK

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-28 17:21:12 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 28 17:20:06 2013 New Revision: 198375 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198375&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-28 Jerry DeLisle B

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-28 17:14:05 UTC --- > "Two dummy arguments are distinguishable if neither is a subroutine and > neither > is TKR compatible (5.1.1.2) with the other." AFAICT this is not a constraint on t

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-28 16:55:52 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 28 13:47:42 2013 New Revision: 198370 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198370&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-28 Jerry DeLisle B

[Bug fortran/52512] Cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-28 16:54:14 UTC --- Really closed now. Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 28 16:50:19 2013 New Revision: 198373 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198373&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-28 Je

[Bug fortran/34004] Accepts invalid: Ambigiuous interface with subroutine.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34004 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug sanitizer/57104] New: ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7594 with -fsanitize=thread and hardreg variable

checking=yes,rtl,df --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-198366-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130428 (experimental) (GCC) Tested revisions: r198366 - crash 4.8 r198018 - crash

[Bug middle-end/57103] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: location references block not in block tree with -ftree-parallelize-loops=4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57103 Bug #: 57103 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: location references block not in block tree with -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 Classification: Unclassifi

[Bug c++/57102] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in fndecl_declared_return_type with -fcompare-debug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57102 Bug #: 57102 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in fndecl_declared_return_type with -fcompare-debug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-28 13:41:53 UTC --- I can't reproduce the ICE with 4.9 r198366 configured as a cross to armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi, on either x86_64-linux or i686-linux, or natively on armv5tel-unknown-linux

[Bug fortran/57071] Optimize (-1)**k to 1 - 2 * mod(K, 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-28 13:34:08 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Apr 28 13:32:59 2013 New Revision: 198369 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198369&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2013-04-28 Thomas Koenig PR

[Bug fortran/57096] Allocatable variable is not behaved as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-28 13:19:03 UTC --- The simplest test case I found contains two files: ModA.f03: - module ModA implicit none integer, allocatable :: gA end module ModA test.f03:

[Bug libstdc++/51365] cannot use final empty class in std::tuple

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51365 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.8.1 |4.9.0 --- Comment #17 from Jo

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #6 from synergye at codefi dot re 2013-04-28 10:18:46 UTC --- Created attachment 29962 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29962 preprocessed code Attached is the preprocessed code. I apologize about that and i

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2013-04-28 10:18:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > That's the original C code, not the _preprocessed_ C code. It still depends > on > numerous headers files to compile. Please just do > > > -E

[Bug target/46250] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -fPIC -mcmodel=large and __thread variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46250 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug fortran/57093] Seg fault on internal output to a character scalar coarray

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/57101] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57101 Bug #: 57101 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-28 09:11:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 29954 [details] > Affected code > > Attached is contents.c that I mentioned in the initial post. This is from > system/extr

[Bug middle-end/57073] __builtin_powif (-1.0, k) should be optimized to "1.0 - 2.0 * (K%2)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57073 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-28 09:05:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Modulo is an integer only operation, so I'd say you want > (k & 1) ? -1.0 : 1.0 > instead, converting (k & 1) into floating point and multiplying and

[Bug fortran/57096] Allocatable variable is not behaved as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code --- Commen

[Bug rtl-optimization/57100] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:869 with -fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue-graph

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57100 Bug #: 57100 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:869 with -fdump-rtl-pro_and_epilogue-graph Classification: Unclassified

[Bug target/46250] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -fPIC -mcmodel=large and __thread variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46250 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46250] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -fPIC -mcmodel=large and __thread variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46250 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drepper.fsp at gmail dot

[Bug target/50963] TLS incompatible with -mcmodel=large & PIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50963 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/57099] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154 (unrecognizable insn) with -mcmodel=large and TLS variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57099 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46250] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2110 (unrecognizable insn) with -fPIC -mcmodel=large and __thread variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46250 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-28 08:03:09 UTC --- *** Bug 57099 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/57096] Polymorphic allocatable variable is not behaved as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096 --- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-28 07:48:27 UTC --- Created attachment 29959 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29959 reduced test case Confirmed with current trunk. It is not related to polymorphi

[Bug target/57099] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154 (unrecognizable insn) with -mcmodel=large and TLS variable

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57099 Bug #: 57099 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154 (unrecognizable insn) with -mcmodel=large and TLS variable Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/57098] New: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154 (unrecognizable insn) with -mcmodel=large -msse4 and __builtin_shuffle()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57098 Bug #: 57098 Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2154 (unrecognizable insn) with -mcmodel=large -msse4 and __builtin_shuffle() Classification: Unclassified