[Bug target/57097] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in find_hard_regno_for, at lra-assigns.c:561 with -O2 -fPIC -m32

-enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-198362-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --without-cloog --without-ppl Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.0 20130427 (experimental) (GCC) Tested revisions: r198362 - crash 4.8 r198018 - crash 4.7 r198018 - OK

[Bug fortran/52512] Cannot match namelist object name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512 --- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-28 03:24:29 UTC --- Committed to support backport of fix to PR56786 Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Apr 28 02:59:44 2013 New Revision: 198366 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198366&root=gcc&v

[Bug fortran/57096] New: Polymorphic allocatable variable is not behaved as expected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57096 Bug #: 57096 Summary: Polymorphic allocatable variable is not behaved as expected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/57063] static_cast from data member to rvalue reference sometimes wrongfully produces lvalue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57063 lucdanton at free dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lucdanton at free dot fr

[Bug c++/56958] Spurious set but not used variable warning in empty pack expansion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56958 --- Comment #3 from lucdanton at free dot fr 2013-04-28 00:37:37 UTC --- I do make use of the variable in the pack; that the pack may be empty for some instantiations may or may not be something to look out for, but I don't think that it sho

[Bug target/56716] during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 --- Comment #10 from Greg 2013-04-27 23:28:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > b internal_error > run > bt Alas, still no results. gbullock@gbullock-W7 ~ $ cd /home/gbullock/gcc48o/i686-pc-mingw32/libgcc gbullock@gbullock-W7 ~

[Bug fortran/57071] Optimize (-1)**k to 1 - 2 * mod(K, 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-27 23:19:13 UTC --- While special-casing power, it might also make sense to translate 2**n to ishft(1,n).

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #3 from synergye at codefi dot re 2013-04-27 22:54:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please attach _preprocessed_ source for the test case, and tell us what > options > gcc was invoked when compiling the test case. I've a

[Bug libfortran/56786] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Namelist read fails with designators containing embedded spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56786 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-04-27 22:51:47 UTC --- I am in the process of back port to 4.8 along with Tilos patches for 52512 and probably 51825. I will do each separately so we can have a clear record.

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #2 from synergye at codefi dot re 2013-04-27 22:48:45 UTC --- Created attachment 29954 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29954 Affected code Attached is contents.c that I mentioned in the initial post. This i

[Bug c++/57092] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Using decltype of function pointer type to define a data member causes compiler crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57092 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug target/56716] during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed: What|Removed |Added CC|aldot at gcc dot gnu.org| --- Comment #9 from

[Bug fortran/57095] New: [Fortran-Dev] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_[234].f90 -O* execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57095 Bug #: 57095 Summary: [Fortran-Dev] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_[234].f90 -O* execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Vers

[Bug fortran/57094] New: [Fortran-Dev] ICE: in lhd_incomplete_type_error, at langhooks.c:203

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57094 Bug #: 57094 Summary: [Fortran-Dev] ICE: in lhd_incomplete_type_error, at langhooks.c:203 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: fortran-dev Sta

[Bug target/56716] during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 --- Comment #8 from Greg 2013-04-27 21:54:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > Can you please provide a backtrace from the crash? > > Alas, no success. gdb reports "No stack." after the crash. I'd used

[Bug fortran/57090] [Fortran-Dev] FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_bounds_1.f90 -O* execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57090 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-27 21:51:53 UTC --- If in the reduced test I print also the size of x%ib, the output becomes 1 6 expected 1 4 6 -1 1 expected -1 2

[Bug c++/57092] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Using decltype of function pointer type to define a data member causes compiler crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57092 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57093] New: Seg fault on internal output to a character scalar coarray

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57093 Bug #: 57093 Summary: Seg fault on internal output to a character scalar coarray Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/57092] New: Using decltype of function pointer type to define a data member causes compiler crash

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57092 Bug #: 57092 Summary: Using decltype of function pointer type to define a data member causes compiler crash Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/56953] Inheriting constructors triggers instantiation of parameters at point of declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56953 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/57091] New: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 with -mcmodel=large and indirect call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57091 Bug #: 57091 Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE: in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268 with -mcmodel=large and indirect call Classification: Unclassified Pr

[Bug target/56716] during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 --- Comment #7 from Greg 2013-04-27 16:16:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > Can you please provide a backtrace from the crash? Alas, no success. gdb reports "No stack." after the crash. I'd used make BOOT_CFLAGS='-g -O' bootst

[Bug fortran/50438] [F03] proc pointer to subroutine in structure constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50438 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-27 15:31:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > This is also sufficient to remove the error. Regtesting now ... The patch in comment 5 regtests cleanly. However, it only fixes comment 1 b

[Bug fortran/57090] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_bounds_1.f90 -O* execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57090 Bug #: 57090 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_bounds_1.f90 -O* execution test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: fortran-dev Status: U

[Bug fortran/56800] [fortran-dev Regression] move_alloc_13.f90 failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56800 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53298] ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY + substring

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/57071] Optimize (-1)**k to 1 - 2 * mod(K, 2)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57071 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/57087] make failed: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57087 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-04-27 12:47:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > A response from Tim Prince suggested using the exact versions cited in > >the INSTALL HTML files. This referred to: gcc/contrib/download_prerequisi

[Bug target/56866] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] with '-O3 -march=bdver2' misscompiles glibc-2.17/crypt/sha512.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4 Summary|gcc 4.7

[Bug target/56866] gcc 4.7.x/gcc-4.8.x with '-O3 -march=bdver2' misscompiles glibc-2.17/crypt/sha512.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50438] [F03] proc pointer to subroutine in structure constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50438 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assig

[Bug middle-end/57089] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1647

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57089 Bug #: 57089 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at cfgloop.c:1647 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcc/57085] Segmentation Fault when building a c file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57085 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-27 10:00:13 UTC --- Please attach _preprocessed_ source for the test case, and tell us what options gcc was invoked when compiling the test case.

[Bug bootstrap/57087] make failed: libmpfr not found or uses a different ABI

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57087 --- Comment #1 from Ellis N. Thomas 2013-04-27 08:10:58 UTC --- Comment on attachment 29950 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29950 Notes on installation of gcc-4.7.2 >Notes on installation of gcc-4.7.2 > >To: gcc-bugs