http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56936
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-13
06:02:45 UTC ---
If it is considered dependent then you could specialize struct x and have a
valid definition of struct x only for the specialized version.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56936
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-13
06:01:02 UTC ---
There is a Defect report about x being considered a dependent (or
non-dependent) and I forget how that was resolved (if resolved yet at all). If
it has not been resolved yet th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Gallagher 2013-04-13
01:44:27 UTC ---
I did several attempts at bisecting this. Whenever I (hackily) reverted the
change which caused the regression, it just popped up a few hundred revs later.
This seems to b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56493
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Berner 2013-04-13
01:37:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 29864
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29864
Simple test case
Here's an even simpler test case. It seems that there's a fairly seri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577
Nathan Ridge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56943
Nathan Ridge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56943
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-13
00:33:04 UTC ---
Please double check this isn't a Dup of PR51577
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56943
Bug #: 56943
Summary: Incorrect two-phase name lookup for operators
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56942
Bug #: 56942
Summary: MIPS GCC will not build with -mips16 mode because
libgcc fails to build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56266
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56941
Bug #: 56941
Summary: Thread conflict is reported by helgrind in
_Unwind_IteratePhdrCallback
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56909
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2013-04-12
21:35:26 UTC ---
> Remove what? The '--with-arch=i686' setting? If so then is there any
> workaround
> to get rid of those undefined references.
Yes, remove --with-arch=i686 and --with-tune=i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56940
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-12
20:56:36 UTC ---
Is the following code valid?
integer :: i, idx(4), r(4), p(4)
p = [1,2,3,4]
idx = [2,2,2,2]
r = 0
r(idx) = p
print *, sum(r)
r = 0
do i = 1, 4
r(idx(i)) = p(i)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48259
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56909
--- Comment #5 from Arthur Zhang 2013-04-12
20:39:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > The only configure option works for now is '--with-arch=i686'. Thanks.
>
> You're welcome. But you should remove it, it probably slows down the
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
--- Comment #6 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2013-04-12 20:34:31 UTC ---
I can't reproduce the bug with GCC 4.7.3 and 4.8.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56940
Bug #: 56940
Summary: internal compiler error: unrecognizable insn:
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56219
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56932
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-12 20:02:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Well, indeed increasing the array-size helps to avoid this issue.
> Nevertheless
> I don't get why it produces wrong code for argument of call of func
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 19:40:32 UTC ---
Seems to be a module-loading problem. Backtrace for the error message:
#0 gfc_use_derived (sym=0x1a1dc60) at
/home/janus/gcc49/trunk/gcc/fortran/symbol.c:1988
#1 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54638
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kallisti5 at unixzen dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56938
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55959
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 19:10:29 UTC ---
In 4.8 and trunk, there is an additional problem with the test case in comment
0, see PR 56939.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56939
Bug #: 56939
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] [OOP] Derived type is being used
before it is defined
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56932
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-12
19:00:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Well, indeed increasing the array-size helps to avoid this issue.
> Nevertheless
> I don't get why it produces wrong code for argument of call of fu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52160
Pedro Alves changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palves at redhat dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56919
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866
--- Comment #7 from Winfried Magerl 2013-04-12
18:42:48 UTC ---
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:42:26PM +, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2013-04-12
> 12:42:26 UTC ---
> I've bootstrapped and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56932
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2013-04-12 18:31:05
UTC ---
Well, indeed increasing the array-size helps to avoid this issue. Nevertheless
I don't get why it produces wrong code for argument of call of function t here.
That there is a out-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56938
Bug #: 56938
Summary: Compiling GCC 4.6.3 with GCC 4.8.0 results in internal
build errors.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56937
Bug #: 56937
Summary: Unnecessarily temporary with array-vector assignments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: mis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56906
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56929
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56929
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-12
17:56:39 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 12 17:55:48 2013
New Revision: 197930
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197930&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-04-12 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40986
Ludovic Brenta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56792
--- Comment #3 from cynt6007 at vandals dot uidaho.edu 2013-04-12 16:53:52 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Is this related to PR52472?
Yes it is. The problem is
internal compiler error: in
convert_debug_memory_address, at cfgexpan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56792
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55331
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54828
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55838
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56051
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53942
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54894
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53667
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48124
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53516
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53501
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53550
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52375
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50946
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54965
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21617
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37060
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52553
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50101
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39839
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36758
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49206
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50040
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48389
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52925
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55184
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52423
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51092
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42961
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48235
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo