http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-08
06:56:30 UTC ---
"One way: put this function into the preinint array; this is automatically done
if you use -static-libasan;"
That is actually done whenever the binary is linked with -fsaniti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56870
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2013-04-08 06:51:58
UTC ---
Hmm, this bug looks like a duplicate of PR/56742
Could you test if provided patch in PR/56742 fixes your issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56870
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|js-gcc at webkeks dot org |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
--- Comment #23 from Kostya Serebryany 2013-04-08
06:32:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Has this been resolved in the final 4.8.0 (r196952)? I checked some changes
> and
> they seems to be in.
>
> I have a number (<100) C++/C pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
--- Comment #1 from Rich Townsend 2013-04-08
06:02:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 29821
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29821
Test program to reproduce the error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56872
Bug #: 56872
Summary: Incorrect SUM evaluation, involving implied-do loop,
with -ffrontend-optimize
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56871
Bug #: 56871
Summary: [c++11] Specialization of constexpr Templated Function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56870
js-gcc at webkeks dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||js-gcc at webkeks dot o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56870
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56870
Bug #: 56870
Summary: @catch handler broken with SEH
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47047
dank at kegel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dank at kegel dot com
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56855
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-07 21:18:28
UTC ---
There is still something suboptimal in that with -mxop, vashrv2di3 works fine,
but tree-vect-generic lowers vashrv4di3 to scalars instead of v2di. But that
doesn't look like a tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-07
21:10:04 UTC ---
Don't we have an old issue with folding happening too early in some cases? I'm
wondering if this isn't just an example, but I can't quickly find that issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56855
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-07
20:57:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Whatever it is, doesn't have much to do with constexpr, consider:
That definitely makes it feel like 0*n being considered a null pointer constant
w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.2
--- Comment #1 from Matt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56869
Bug #: 56869
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with the 4.7.3 release
candidate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-07
20:39:43 UTC ---
The temporary is missing as far as 4.3.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2013-04-07
20:19:53 UTC ---
Oops, here it is:
program main
character(len=4) :: a
character(len=4) :: c(3)
c(1) = 'abcd'
c(2) = '1234'
c(3) = 'wxyz'
c(:)(1:2) = c(2)(2:3)
print '(A)',c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2013-04-07
20:15:06 UTC ---
Can you attach the test case?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-07
19:41:33 UTC ---
Whatever it is, doesn't have much to do with constexpr, consider:
#include
int f(void *) { return 0; }
int f(...) { return 1; }
int g(int n) { return f(n*0); }
int m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-07
18:51:00 UTC ---
Looks like 0*0 is being considered a null pointer constant.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
--- Comment #1 from Hubert Matthews 2013-04-07
18:39:04 UTC ---
Compiled with g++-4.7.0 -Wall -Wextra -std=c++11 on Fedora 14, 64-bit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56868
Bug #: 56868
Summary: Constexpr example in 7.1.5/5 fails to compile
correctly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53728
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56867
Bug #: 56867
Summary: Missing temporary with string array assignment
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866
--- Comment #1 from Winfried Magerl 2013-04-07
16:55:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 29820
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29820
tar-file with small set of c-files to reproduce the problem
A small test-script test-gcc.sh to demonstrate the problem. Verified on:
gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 20130407 / glibc-2.17
gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 20130108 / opensuse-12.3 / glibc-2.17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-07 16:30:10
UTC ---
Neither r196686 nor r197531 are revisions on the trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-07
15:31:13 UTC ---
> > The tests pass for me on costmodel-vect-76b.c at r196686.
>
> The test was run with r197541.
I did a copy&paste error, the tests pass for me at r197531.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2013-04-07 15:26:32
UTC ---
The test was run with r197541.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56865
Bug #: 56865
Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-42.c
scan-tree-dump-times vect "Vectorizing an unaligned
access" 4
Classification: Unclassified
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-04-07
14:56:42 UTC ---
The tests pass for me on costmodel-vect-76b.c at r196686.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56864
Bug #: 56864
Summary: [4.9 regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-76b.c
scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 0
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56863
Bug #: 56863
Summary: cmpnltpd recognition
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56812
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-04-07 13:35:54 UTC ---
> The test is failing on ia64:
>
> $ grep basic slp-pr56812.cc.115t.slp
> /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20130404/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/slp-pr56812.cc:16: note:
> not vectori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56861
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-04-07
13:34:20 UTC ---
(Andrew, I don't think this is a libstdc++ bug, maybe tree-optimization)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56861
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37021
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres
2013-04-07 13:18:27 UTC ---
The test gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-pr37021.f90 fails on powerpc*-* (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-04/msg00677.html ). Isn't it
expected? AFAICT doubles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56852
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2013-04-07
11:28:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 29817
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29817
Another tentative patch
This variant moves the namespace allocation to parse_select_type_blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56393
David Abdurachmanov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.abdurachmanov at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56858
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2013-04-07 08:28:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I can't test this because I have no access to alpha hardware.
I'll bootstrap and regression test the patch on ev68, please expect results in
a coup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56862
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2013-04-07
08:18:18 UTC ---
I think everything is working by design, both in the compiler and in the
library (which is very simple in this area). This is enough to show the issue
(all the compiler I have a
50 matches
Mail list logo
