http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56754
Michael Davies changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nemykal at mercurylampe dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-03-30
05:05:03 UTC ---
Oops! Disregard Comment #20. There is a not so subtle effect when one mixes up
the letter 'l' and the digit '1' in names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56743
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55117
--- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-03-30
03:54:27 UTC ---
Lets take namelist out of the picture here for the case of comment #6
program test_type_extension
type t1_t
real :: x
end type t1_t
type, extends(t1_t) :: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #24 from Jerry DeLisle 2013-03-30
02:58:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 29751
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29751
Related test case
This example fails with a runtime error and passes with ifort. The othe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56785
Bug #: 56785
Summary: std::tuple of two elements does not apply empty base
class optimization when one of its elements is a
std::tuple with two elements
Classification: Unclassifi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P5 |P2
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
--- Comment #2 from michael at talamasca dot ocis.net 2013-03-30 00:26:53 UTC ---
The bug itself seems to have been silently fixed in 4.7.2 or earlier, maybe.
My testcase no longer causes cmov to be emitted, although this could be an
accid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49880
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-29
22:35:01 UTC ---
FIXED on the 4.9 trunk.
Thanks Toon for pointing out this feature. The feature is handled in the same
way as IBM: The hidden present argument is passed before the hidden
str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35203
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig 2013-03-29
22:19:05 UTC ---
The patch from comment#12 causes memory failure of the
following code:
module zero
implicit none
contains
subroutine foo(a)
real, contiguous :: a(:,:)
a(:,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56771
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||centos-6.4/i686
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56744
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49232
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56765
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-29 21:30:03 UTC ---
With this patch ...
Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/resolve.c(revision 196862)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #7 from Dick Guertin 2013-03-29
21:22:54 UTC ---
Is there a replacement for Apple's linker that would run on Snow Leopard?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #6 from Dick Guertin 2013-03-29
21:19:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> >
> > Johanathan, 4.2 was NOT a typo. That was the version of g++ that came with
> > Snow Leopard. It was failing. I r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-29
20:56:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
>
> Johanathan, 4.2 was NOT a typo. That was the version of g++ that came with
> Snow Leopard. It was failing. I replaced it by version 4.7 obtai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #4 from Dick Guertin 2013-03-29
20:04:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Are you sure that this is not a bug in Apple's part of the toolchain and
> > > not
> > >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2013-03-29 19:53:44
UTC ---
Segher pointed out that the transformed code example is has a bug. The first
revised loop should test j+1 < NZ.
for (j = 0; j+1 < NZ; j += 2){
fValue += Q[j] /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-29
19:27:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Are you sure that this is not a bug in Apple's part of the toolchain and not
> > g++?
>
> I'm almost positive. But
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56749
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56784
Bug #: 56784
Summary: bootstrap broken by libitm on
x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2013-03-29 18:11:54
UTC ---
I tried -funroll-loops -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller. I did not see any
additional benefit from -fvariable-expansion-in-unroller.
Unrolling helped somewhat, the intermedi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
--- Comment #2 from Dick Guertin 2013-03-29
17:57:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Are you sure that this is not a bug in Apple's part of the toolchain and not
> g++?
I'm almost positive. But you need to define the term "toolchain"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |debug
--- Comment #1 from Andre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56783
Bug #: 56783
Summary: g++ does not supply signatures for gdb on g++ 4.7
versions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54200
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56770
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782
Bug #: 56782
Summary: [C++11] Regression with empty pack expansions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56781
Bug #: 56781
Summary: boostrap-asan failure: fixincl fails to link (missing
-lasan)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56780
Bug #: 56780
Summary: --disable-install-libiberty still installs libiberty.a
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53330
--- Comment #3 from Adam Borowski 2013-03-29
13:20:53 UTC ---
Re-tested:
* gcc-4.7.2 works on amd64, armhf, x32, fails on i386
* gcc-4.8.0 works on all of the above
(all Debian)
So it appears to be fixed in 4.8, at least on architectur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28315
Laszlo Ersek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53330
--- Comment #2 from Adam Borowski 2013-03-29
13:13:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 29750
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29750
updated testcase
Updated testcase: it checks for invalid pointers (by freeing them), and re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56779
Bug #: 56779
Summary: libstdc++.so: undefined reference to
`libintl_textdomain'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56778
Bug #: 56778
Summary: ICE on several benchmarks after r196775.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56777
Bug #: 56777
Summary: bad grammar in fwhole-program documentation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35118
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-04-23 17:57:20 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40168
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-12-18 14:45:13 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||39304
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39304
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36933
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25621
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56752
--- Comment #5 from David Starner 2013-03-29
10:00:04 UTC ---
You could check that right after building the multilib compiler before trying
to compile real code. That would at least give an error message that said what
was wrong, instead o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41137
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-11-01 16:21:21 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-29
09:40:13 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 29 09:39:47 2013
New Revision: 197230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197230&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2012-03-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56737
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-29
09:38:20 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 29 09:37:37 2013
New Revision: 197229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197229&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-03-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56735
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-29
09:34:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 29 09:32:57 2013
New Revision: 197228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=197228&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-03-29 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45337
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-08-19 09:47:08 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56776
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56776
Bug #: 56776
Summary: valgrind errors within ira
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47532
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40362
--- Comment #15 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-03-29 09:11:10 UTC ---
*** Bug 50175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50175
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40194
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41453
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-29 00:00:00 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34940
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-29 11:27:01 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2011-11-14 00:00:00 |2013-03-29
--- Comment #10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-04-06 10:57:29 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56734
--- Comment #6 from Marc Girod 2013-03-29
08:39:38 UTC ---
I can acknowledge that installing binutils 2.23.2 solved my problem with gcc
4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
--- Comment #22 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-03-29 08:33:31 UTC ---
Improved in part by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-03/msg00143.html
as r197124 for 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47341
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-06-30 11:21:06 |2013-03-29
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31021
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||37150
--- Comment #16 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56063
--- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-03-29 08:12:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> What I could do is to hide the calendar button and add a "Now" link instead.
I think this would be really appreciated.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55561
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|TSAN: Fortran/OMP yields|TSAN: provide a TSAN
83 matches
Mail list logo