http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56629
Bug #: 56629
Summary: template struct confused with template member function
of same name
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56628
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2013-03-16 03:49:05 UTC ---
With --with-build-config="bootstrap-asan" and profiledbootstrap I get an ICE:
/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56492
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16
02:48:14 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sat Mar 16 02:48:06 2013
New Revision: 196695
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196695
Log:
PR libstdc++/56492
* include/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-16
02:22:39 UTC ---
I'm happy to fix things in libstdc++ that are broken and cause real problems
for clang users, but this is correct C++ and causes a spurious warning. Not a
bug, not worth wasti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48814
Nick Maclaren changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nmm1 at cam dot ac.uk
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2013-03-15
21:17:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)rd.
> However, as at least one of the most popular compilers (clang 3.2 RELEASE with
> -Wall) issues a warning for this. Thu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
--- Comment #2 from ahansson 2013-03-15
21:04:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> In C++, class and struct are interchangeable.
Agreed. Technically the code is ok, and in line with the language standard.
However, as at least one of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56628
Bug #: 56628
Summary: "bootstrap-lto bootstrap-asan" / profiledbootstrap
fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56627
Bug #: 56627
Summary: class hash instead of struct hash
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56584
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56626
Bug #: 56626
Summary: [DWARF/debug] Generate proper debug symbols for
assumed-rank arrays
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39326
--- Comment #48 from Richard Biener 2013-03-15
16:06:33 UTC ---
Removing all the caching (dep/indep_loop and dep/indep_ref) makes things
faster ... (they have a hit rate of 5% resp. 6.2% only)
Fastest timing sofar:
tree loop invarian
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56585
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55050
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55068
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56619
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-03-15
13:49:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> > Which? Recent versions of EDG and clang both accept the testcase in comment
> > 22.
>
> MSVC 2010
"Other compilers have bugs" doesn't see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764
--- Comment #26 from André Wöbbeking 2013-03-15
13:45:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > 3) some other compiler don't compile this
>
> Which? Recent versions of EDG and clang both accept the testcase in commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764
--- Comment #25 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-15
13:36:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> OK, I read some explanations in the duplicates but still don't know why this
> should be valid code.
That is a question for the standards committ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Summary|After if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
--- Comment #4 from Michael Zolotukhin
2013-03-15 12:27:51 UTC ---
Sorry, it looks like the reproducer with if could be made, and here it is:
void foo (long *a)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i+=2)
{
if (a[i] == 0)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56625
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
--- Comment #3 from Michael Zolotukhin
2013-03-15 12:26:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 29674
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29674
Reproducer 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
--- Comment #2 from Michael Zolotukhin
2013-03-15 12:19:50 UTC ---
> Can you reproduce a testcase for that instead? It doesn't make sense
> to handle code that should be optimized earlier (by DSE). Is it from
> code like
>
> if (cond
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56625
Bug #: 56625
Summary: After if-conversion vectorizer doesn't recognize
similar stores
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56615
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56615
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-15
12:06:24 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 15 12:06:08 2013
New Revision: 196677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196677
Log:
2013-03-15 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56615
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-15
12:05:55 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 15 12:05:45 2013
New Revision: 196676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196676
Log:
2013-03-15 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56624
Bug #: 56624
Summary: Vectorizer gives up on a group-access if it contains
stores to the same location
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56615
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2013-03-15
10:09:44 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Mar 15 10:09:39 2013
New Revision: 196675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196675
Log:
2013-03-15 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11764
--- Comment #24 from André Wöbbeking 2013-03-15
09:25:02 UTC ---
OK, I read some explanations in the duplicates but still don't know why this
should be valid code. IMO it makes no sense to write A:A:A:B and given the
facts that
1) people don't w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56622
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-03-15
08:57:18 UTC ---
openMP is lowered later than your plugin runs and there are still
sub-statements
around.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56622
--- Comment #3 from hayder.alkhalissi at googlemail dot com 2013-03-15 08:35:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> >join_on_bb_function_call, at aop-pc-fun-call.c:246
>
> This is a bug in your plugin code and not in GCC. Please report it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56307
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-03-15
07:06:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Mar 15 07:06:49 2013
New Revision: 196672
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196672
Log:
PR debug/56307
* gcc.dg/tree-s
40 matches
Mail list logo
