http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56478
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56479
Bug #: 56479
Summary: Register allocator can't allocate two 4-byte variables
into 8 registers for inline asm on avr-gcc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56473
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Dean 2013-02-28
00:38:56 UTC ---
Looking again at gdb, _start from ubuntu is not the same as _start on
RaspberryPi, although both compiler versions are the same.
###
## build on ubuntu
## gdb on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56473
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Dean 2013-02-28
00:24:44 UTC ---
On Ubuntu, I recompiled with -g
On RaspberryPi, I ran gdb on the resulting executable
tomdean@raspberrypi:~/p9x79/bug$ gdb hello
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Reading symbols f
from 4.7 which compiles the code
fine.
$ gcc-trunk --version
gcc-trunk (GCC) 4.8.0 20130227 (experimental) [trunk revision 196310]
$ cat crash2.c
/* gcc-trunk -O2+ */
int a;
void fn1 ()
{
int b;
b = 0;
for (;; b++)
a = 0 < -9223372036854775807LL - 1 - b ? : 0;
}
$ gcc-trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56477
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2013-02-27
22:31:08 UTC ---
> where value->symtree->n.sym->ns->parent is NULL.
Should be rvalue->symtree->n.sym->ns->parent (copy&paste error).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56477
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #5 from Karlson2k 2013-02-27 22:07:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Well, AC_TRY_RUN is for sure the wrong approach here. As such tests are
> failing badly on cross-compilers.
> I think sanest way to solve this is by spec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
22:06:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 22:06:21 2013
New Revision: 196325
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196325
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
22:05:46 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 22:05:33 2013
New Revision: 196324
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196324
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-ssa
red with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/abenson
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib --with-gmp=/home/abenson
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20130227 (experimental) (GCC)
$ gfortran -c -o ICEtest.o ICEtest.F90 -Wall
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
21:41:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 21:40:53 2013
New Revision: 196323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196323
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
21:36:09 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 21:35:53 2013
New Revision: 196322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196322
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* ipa-pure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
21:35:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 21:35:06 2013
New Revision: 196321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196321
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* df-scan.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
21:34:35 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 21:34:27 2013
New Revision: 196320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196320
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* ipa-cp.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
21:33:28 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 21:33:20 2013
New Revision: 196319
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196319
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* ipa-refer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2013-02-27 21:20:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I see. Interesting. I wonder if that is a bug in gold. I wonder what other
I think this is related to the gold bug:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460
--- Comment #5 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com
2013-02-27 21:09:55 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Chris Reed 2013-02-27 12:15:52
> UTC ---
> Yes, I'm happy to address the copyright issue - the copyright disclaimer route
> seems simpler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-02-27 21:07:59
UTC ---
I see. Interesting. I wonder if that is a bug in gold. I wonder what other
ELF linkers do.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-27
20:24:30 UTC ---
I agree. Care to send a patch for that?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56098
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joff at embeddedarm dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #3 from Kai Tietz 2013-02-27 19:45:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> We had an AC_TRY_RUN test, but such kind of test give a lot of problems and we
> removed it. We had:
>
> AC_TRY_RUN([#include
> int main(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Component|ta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2013-02-27 19:36:07
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Object OBJ has a weak reference to SYM.
>
> OBJ is linked against shared library S1. S1 does not define SYM.
>
> S1 happens to be linked against share
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
--- Comment #2 from Karlson2k 2013-02-27 19:28:17 UTC ---
Better to open random devices with "rb"? Or just 'stat' device?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56476
Bug #: 56476
Summary: ARM volatile writes/str creates superfluous and
uncalled for read/ldr with -Os
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55340
--- Comment #3 from Johnny Willemsen 2013-02-27
19:20:24 UTC ---
Thanks for checking this, will also try 4.8.0 at some point. We have hundreds
of tests using C++11 extensively and this was the only one exposing this
warning. This is mostly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56475
Bug #: 56475
Summary: Incorrect result of configure test for /dev/random
(_GLIBCXX_USE_RANDOM_TR1) for MinGW platform (and
others?)
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
18:52:05 UTC ---
Sounds like dup of PR52888. Richard, is that safely backportable, or not?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-02-27 18:49:43
UTC ---
Object OBJ has a weak reference to SYM.
OBJ is linked against shared library S1. S1 does not define SYM.
S1 happens to be linked against shared library S2. S2 does defi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55813
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stefano.borini at ferrara
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51286
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56358
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-27
18:13:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 27 18:13:24 2013
New Revision: 196316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196316
Log:
PR c++/56358
PR c++/56323
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56358
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-27
18:13:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 27 18:13:24 2013
New Revision: 196316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196316
Log:
PR c++/56358
PR c++/56323
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56473
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #2 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474
Bug #: 56474
Summary: GNAT computes size of the object to be allocated
incorrectly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
17:25:10 UTC ---
Some more patches have been posted to gcc-patches and I'm going to post even
more.
There are two issues I don't have a solution for if anybody is interested.
Testcase:
cd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2013-02-27 16:59:17
UTC ---
The new GNU ld is complaining about an undefined weak reference because
it sees libpthread.so from DT_NEEDED in libgo.so. The old GNU ld just
silently adds libpthread.so from DT_NEEDE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493
Fanael changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50939
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|jamborm a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55170
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-27
16:07:16 UTC ---
Jason, did you notice this issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55340
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51993
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56473
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-27
15:41:34 UTC ---
If these files come form an Ubuntu package then it should be reported to Ubuntu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56473
Bug #: 56473
Summary: Cross Compile Ubuntu x86_64 to Raspberry Pi Code Seg
Faults When Executed
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56431
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor 2013-02-27 14:54:22
UTC ---
The reference to pthread_sigmask in generic-morestack.c is weak, and the code
handles the weak reference correctly. It looks like gold is doing the right
thing by emitting a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-02-27
14:01:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 27 14:01:08 2013
New Revision: 196313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196313
Log:
PR middle-end/56461
* tree-flow
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50537
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56459
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55786
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55773
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-27
13:03:24 UTC ---
You didn't provide any detail about your system. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report
On a modern x86_64-linux system the problem cannot be reproduced with current
gcc-4_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53521
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xarthisius.kk at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56460
--- Comment #4 from Chris Reed 2013-02-27 12:15:52 UTC
---
Yes, I'm happy to address the copyright issue - the copyright disclaimer route
seems simpler.
qsort'ing the entire array was more for simplicity - I was more concerned by
the pe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56471
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56472
Bug #: 56472
Summary: vcondu undocumented
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53310
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herve.manche at libertysurf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51487
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #26 from Paolo Car
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ogoffart at kde dot org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2013-02-27
10:24:21 UTC ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54383 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53383
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ogoffart at kde dot org
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56471
Bug #: 56471
Summary: Program crashes when allocating a derived type with a
character allocatable array component.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56462
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56446
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Priority|P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56424
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56466
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2013-02-27
09:40:09 UTC ---
RTL unrolling does excessive manual verify_loop_structure calls. I suppose
we can either add an argument to verify_loop_structure to say whether to
check only existing loops o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470
Bug #: 56470
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid shift
operand
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56468
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-02-27
09:33:27 UTC ---
It's because of the implicit declaration of std::type_info, G++ correctly
diagnoses similar cases with altered namespace names or type names, it only
happens for std::type_inf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--- Comment #27 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-02-27
08:56:15 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed Feb 27 08:56:08 2013
New Revision: 196308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196308
Log:
PR middle-end/45472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56463
--- Comment #5 from Cristóbal Camarero
2013-02-27 08:19:04 UTC ---
Dominique, I think the test I found is more problematic than yours. Since in
mine, the huge value is completely independent of the ending condition. Hence
most people would expec
89 matches
Mail list logo
