[Bug middle-end/56000] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/52865] GCC can't vectorize fortran loop but able to vectorize similar c-loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52865 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bur...@net-b.de, izamyatin

[Bug rtl-optimization/52573] [4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] regrename creates overlapping register allocations for output operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52573 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comm

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/53671] [4.8 Regression] Many guality test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53671 --- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-16 04:31:38 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jan 16 04:31:30 2013 New Revision: 195227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195227 Log: PR rtl-optimization/55547 PR rtl-op

[Bug rtl-optimization/53827] [4.8 Regression][alpha]: Invalid insn scheduling in sched1 pass

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53827 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-16 04:31:39 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jan 16 04:31:30 2013 New Revision: 195227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195227 Log: PR rtl-optimization/55547 PR rtl-opt

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-16 04:31:38 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jan 16 04:31:30 2013 New Revision: 195227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195227 Log: PR rtl-optimization/55547 PR rtl-opt

[Bug debug/49888] VTA: -O2 -g variable value changes, it does not change in the source

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49888 --- Comment #12 from Alexandre Oliva 2013-01-16 04:31:42 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Wed Jan 16 04:31:30 2013 New Revision: 195227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195227 Log: PR rtl-optimization/55547 PR rtl-op

[Bug middle-end/56000] New: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56000 Bug #: 56000 Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: libffi.call/cls_uchar_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/55938] g++.dg/asan/deep-stack-uaf-1.C fails at r195092 on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55938 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2013-01-16 01:18:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > > Failure no longer present at r195150 remerged with llvm compiler-rt r172419 > > . > > Could you post the corresponding fix? I haven't bothered

[Bug c/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 --- Comment #3 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:35:52 UTC --- Can't attach log.txt (bugzilla is a POS and says "You already used the form to file attachment 29175."), so here it's inline: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LT

[Bug c/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 --- Comment #2 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:33:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29175 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29175 source of test program

[Bug c/55999] gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 --- Comment #1 from nfxjfg at gmail dot com 2013-01-16 00:28:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29174 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29174 source for miscompiled code

[Bug c/55999] New: gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55999 Bug #: 55999 Summary: gcc 4.7.2 -O2 -floop-parallelize-all generates incorrect code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONF

[Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 --- Comment #9 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2013-01-15 23:47:58 UTC --- > Hmm, can't reproduce what your issue is here actual. The issue is that --enable-stdcall-fixup only works with plain object files and does not work when a symbol is in a s

[Bug target/55940] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 22:58:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 22:58:21 2013 New Revision: 195220 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195220 Log: PR target/55940 * function.c (

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 22:57:19 UTC --- Patch: Index: gcc/fortran/parse.c === --- gcc/fortran/parse.c(revision 195125) +++ gcc/fortran/p

[Bug fortran/55984] [4.8 Regression] ICE: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55984 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 22:43:43 UTC --- > bug1.f: In function 'mpdata_advop': > bug1.f:42:0: internal compiler error: gfc_trans_code(): Bad statement code >call bcx%fill_halos() The ICE is due

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 22:17:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > The following patch fixes the ICE in comment 0: ... and regtests cleanly.

[Bug c++/55992] constexpr static member function not recognised in templated using statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55992 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status

[Bug c++/55998] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/55992] constexpr static member function not recognised in templated using statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55992 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug c++/55998] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-01-15 21:56:24 UTC --- Here is the full error message: t6789.cc: In substitution of ‘template using B = A [with int N = (4 - 1)]’: t6789.cc:6:35: required from ‘struct C<4>’ t6789.cc:9:19: required from

[Bug c++/55998] [4.8 Regression] [C++11] 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55998] New: 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55998 Bug #: 55998 Summary: 'integral expression .. is not constant' when instantiating template alias in a template using a parameter of an encapsulating template Classification

[Bug rtl-optimization/55153] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in begin_move_insn, at sched-ebb.c:205 with -fsched2-use-superblocks and __builtin_prefetch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 21:51:36 UTC --- Thanks for working on this. Unfortunately it seems the http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195211 change (commit message didn't make it into this PR because of an

[Bug fortran/47680] [OOP] ICE with polymorphic array elements as dummy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47680 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org Kn

[Bug libstdc++/55997] New: build of libstd3++ segfaults armv5tel.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55997 Bug #: 55997 Summary: build of libstd3++ segfaults armv5tel. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug fortran/44345] ICE in fold_convert_loc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44345 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org Kn

[Bug fortran/43179] ICE invalid if accessing array member of non-array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43179 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/38849] ICE in fold_convert with C_F_POINTER and C binding

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38849 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50176] [4.7/4.8 Regression] 4.7 generates spill-fill dealing with char->int conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comm

[Bug pending/55996] New: [meta-bug] GCC 4.9 pending patches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55996 Bug #: 55996 Summary: [meta-bug] GCC 4.9 pending patches Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug fortran/55983] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55983 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assig

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 --- Comment #10 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 20:01:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > Btw, the same happens if atomic is replaced with "volatile unsigned long > > > y" - > >

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 --- Comment #8 from Michael Paton 2013-01-15 20:01:04 UTC --- Hopefully it's correct to reply to the mailing list rather than to bugzilla. I've tried to find definitive guidance on that and failed. Thanks for your informative reply asser

[Bug testsuite/55994] multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 --- Comment #4 from Janis Johnson 2013-01-15 20:00:17 UTC --- Patch posted: .

[Bug sanitizer/55975] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/global-overflow-1.c -O0 output pattern test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55975 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2013-01-15 19:59:47 UTC --- Breakpoint 1, __asan::AsanThread::Init ( this=this@entry=0x3fffb751d8f8 <__asan::asan_thread_registry+33554432>) at ../../../../../libsanitizer/asan/asan_thread.cc:74

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.8 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/55936] [4.6/4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missed VRP optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55936 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Targe

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 --- Comment #9 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 19:39:20 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Btw, the same happens if atomic is replaced with "volatile unsigned long y" > > - > > which does not violate the standard

[Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 --- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-15 19:38:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > e.cc:9:41: error: the value of 'd' is not usable in a constant expression > constexpr auto g=static_cast(d); // FAIL different >

[Bug target/55981] std::atomic store is split in two smaller stores

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55981 --- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 19:37:55 UTC --- Actually, the patch from comment(In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 29169 [details] > Patch that prevents non-atomic immediates in moves to volatile memory location T

[Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 --- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-15 19:34:17 UTC --- struct A {}; struct B:A {}; struct C:A {}; struct D:B,C {}; constexpr D d; constexpr const C& e=d; // OK constexpr auto f=static_cast(d); // FAIL constexpr auto g=static_ca

[Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 --- Comment #6 from Joshua Napoli 2013-01-15 19:26:49 UTC --- Awesome reduction of the bug!

[Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/55993] [C++11] derived-to-base conversion fails in constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Compone

[Bug libitm/55693] [4.8 Regression] libitm.c++/eh-1.C execution test fails on darwin from r193271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55693 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2013-01-15 19:13:44 UTC --- Unfortunately, the gdb trace in #c1 isn't enough to see what's actually failing. What *ought* to be happening is that the uninstrumented code path runs, f1 makes two call

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #22 from davidxl 2013-01-15 19:03:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > What does it mean to merge two declarations with different target attributes? > Are the strings just combined? This is a good question. 'merge' needs

[Bug other/55982] __strncat_chk is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55982 --- Comment #5 from ppluzhnikov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 18:53:56 UTC --- Author: ppluzhnikov Date: Tue Jan 15 18:53:49 2013 New Revision: 195214 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195214 Log: Backport r195207 (f

[Bug c++/55742] [4.8 regression] __attribute__ in class function declaration cause "prototype does not match" errors.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55742 --- Comment #21 from Jason Merrill 2013-01-15 18:45:18 UTC --- What does it mean to merge two declarations with different target attributes? Are the strings just combined?

[Bug libstdc++/55993] tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 --- Comment #3 from Joshua Napoli 2013-01-15 18:44:10 UTC --- The problem has to do with a completely empty struct being used twice consecutively in the tuple type list. std::tuple inherits from A (by inheriting _Head_base which inherits A

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/55493] [4.8 Regression] LTO always ICEs on i686-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/55940] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 18:28:31 UTC --- I think: --- gcc/function.c.jj2013-01-11 09:02:55.0 +0100 +++ gcc/function.c2013-01-15 19:23:20.648826011 +0100 @@ -6029,7 +6029,7 @@ thread_prologue_and_epi

[Bug bootstrap/53300] [4.8 Regression] AIX bootstrap related to varpool patch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53300 --- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka 2013-01-15 18:23:24 UTC --- Yep, it is kind of kludgy, but other way to handle it is to rewrite the constant pool that is tied into target interface so it is rather hard and I do not see constant pool reall

[Bug libgcj/55637] FAIL: sourcelocation output - source compiled test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55637 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11

[Bug tree-optimization/55995] New: vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55995 Bug #: 55995 Summary: vect increase_alignment notes missing from dump file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug fortran/55574] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C binding access to c_ptr type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55574 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin 2013-01-15 18:02:07 UTC --- Created attachment 29173 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29173 Lightly tested patch

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/49826] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P4 --- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2

[Bug fortran/53537] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Explicit IMPORT of renamed USE-associated symbol fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53537 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug lto/55994] multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 17:48:51 UTC --- Please also read thread at [1]. [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-10/msg00201.html

[Bug target/55940] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug lto/55994] multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2013-01-15 17:44:20 UTC --- "-Wl,--allow-multiple-definition" should be appended to additional_flags for affected targets. --cut here-- Index: builtins.exp ===

[Bug lto/55493] [4.8 Regression] LTO always ICEs on i686-mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55493 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug libstdc++/55993] tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-01-15 17:28:42 UTC --- #include struct A {}; constexpr auto t = std::make_tuple( A(), A() ); constexpr auto a = std::get<0>( t ); t.cc:4:35: error: accessing value of 't' through a 'const A' gl

[Bug libstdc++/55993] tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/55876] internal compiler error: in gen_rtx_SUBREG, at emit-rtl.c:776

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55876 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 17:25:05 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Tue Jan 15 17:24:55 2013 New Revision: 195212 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195212 Log: 2013-01-15 Tom de Vries

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/55994] multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #8 from Janis Johnson 2013-01-15 17:11:40 UTC --- The gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins failures with LTO options are now covered by PR55994.

[Bug lto/55994] New: multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55994 Bug #: 55994 Summary: multiple definition or memset or strlen for builtins tests with LTO options Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug middle-end/53073] [4.8 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53073 Michael Paton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpaton at swbell dot net --- Co

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #10 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 16:57:48 UTC --- And regarding your comment, Jakub, in this case it's not a question of not emitting the code of a function or not. The function code is emitted and the code is definitely wrong

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #9 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 16:55:40 UTC --- Just added the preprocessed source, sorry for the delay. It's the source code from the VirtualBox ticket.

[Bug sanitizer/55938] g++.dg/asan/deep-stack-uaf-1.C fails at r195092 on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55938 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2013-01-15 16:55:13 UTC --- > Failure no longer present at r195150 remerged with llvm compiler-rt r172419 . Could you post the corresponding fix?

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #8 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 16:54:53 UTC --- Created attachment 29172 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29172 Preprocessed source

[Bug libstdc++/55993] New: tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993 Bug #: 55993 Summary: tuple_cat not a constant expression for result size >= 3 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #7 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-15 16:51:54 UTC --- Oh Janis, and when you do, please reference the new PR here so we can close this PR in deference to those 3 individual PRs. Thanks.

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-15 16:49:24 UTC --- > The third is for failures like "FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memset.c > compilation, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects" that fail to > link due to m

[Bug rtl-optimization/55547] [4.8 Regression] Alias analysis does not handle AND addresses correctly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55547 --- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson 2013-01-15 16:47:29 UTC --- The patch in #c4 is ok.

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor 2013-01-15 16:43:14 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Jan 15 16:43:05 2013 New Revision: 195210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195210 Log: 2013-01-15 Martin Jambor PR

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #23 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-01-15 16:39:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > Created attachment 29170 [details] > gcc48-pr48087.patch > > Untested fix. That said, it seems that on the provided testcase g++ already > generat

[Bug c/55967] rightshift an unsigned value (X) by it's number of bits does not always yield 0, when X is an unsigned that's leftshifted by it's number of bits and offset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55967 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2013-01-15 16:38:36 UTC --- Note that clang has -fsanitize=shift which produces a runtime message every time a >> is executed with an out of bounds argument.

[Bug tree-optimization/55920] [4.8 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3753

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55920 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-01-15 16:33:38 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 15 16:33:24 2013 New Revision: 195209 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195209 Log: PR tree-optimization/55920 * tr

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 Janis Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/43961] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [ARM thumb] "branch out of range" with thumb1_output_casesi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6/4.7 Regression] [ARM

[Bug target/43961] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [ARM thumb] "branch out of range" with thumb1_output_casesi

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43961 --- Comment #12 from Joseph S. Myers 2013-01-15 16:17:53 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Jan 15 16:17:28 2013 New Revision: 195208 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195208 Log: 2013-01-15 Joseph Myers M

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 --- Comment #15 from Ray Donnelly 2013-01-15 16:07:45 UTC --- What brought me here was a desire to add some information about this bug, when I saw the odcctools comment from Iain I thought I may as well mention my compilers. Further Inf

[Bug other/55982] __strncat_chk is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55982 Paul Pluzhnikov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/55982] __strncat_chk is buggy

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55982 --- Comment #3 from ppluzhnikov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-15 16:02:51 UTC --- Author: ppluzhnikov Date: Tue Jan 15 16:02:42 2013 New Revision: 195207 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195207 Log: 2013-01-15 Paul Pl

[Bug c++/55992] New: constexpr static member function not recognised in templated using statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55992 Bug #: 55992 Summary: constexpr static member function not recognised in templated using statement Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: U

[Bug bootstrap/50229] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Can't cross compile for i686-apple-darwin10 from x86_64-redhat_linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229 Ray Donnelly changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mingw.android at gmail dot

[Bug bootstrap/55961] [4.8 Regression] system.h includes gmp.h but system.h is included for build and not just target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/55961] [4.8 Regression] system.h includes gmp.h but system.h is included for build and not just target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55961 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2013-01-15 15:54:10 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jan 15 15:54:05 2013 New Revision: 195205 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195205 Log: 2013-01-15 Richard Biener P

[Bug testsuite/55780] effective targets arm_arch_v*_multilib are not strict enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55780 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug testsuite/54139] [4.8 regression] some ARM Thumb-2 tests appear to be run on ARMv5TE hardware causing unhandled exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54139 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2013-01-15 15:49:04 UTC --- Perhaps this is a duplicate of PR55780? If it is, there is already a proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01339.html which has been pinged he

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 --- Comment #7 from Frank Mehnert 2013-01-15 15:37:43 UTC --- Actually this looks like some mixup in the generated machine code: VBoxHost_RTR0MemObjGetPagePhysAddr(): c1b: 8b 0f mov(%edi),%ecx c1d: 8b 47 04

[Bug target/55940] Incorrect code for accessing parameters with 32-bit Intel hosts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55940 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

  1   2   >