http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55820
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-28
04:07:14 UTC ---
yes this code is undefined at compile time. GCC used to reject #define in a
macro usage but it was decided we will accept that. I can find the old bugs if
needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55821
Bug #: 55821
Summary: Release tarballs (unconditionally) install
libquadmath.info when libquadmath is not supported
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55820
Bug #: 55820
Summary: cpp: unterminated argument list invoking macro "BAR"
for #include in macro
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #7 from Koutheir Attouchi 2012-12-28
01:15:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > make uninstall no longer supported so changing to enhancement and
> >
> > It makes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jvdelisle at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-12-28
01:05:18 UTC ---
Possible patch, testing.
Index: list_read.c
===
--- list_read.c(revision 194731)
+++ list_read.c(work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55819
Bug #: 55819
Summary: Conflicting declaration of getcwd breaks mingw-w64
compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-28
00:04:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > make uninstall no longer supported so changing to enhancement and
>
> It makes no sense to say "uninstallation" is not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55818
Bug #: 55818
Summary: Reading a REAL from a file which doesn't end in a new
line fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9346
Koutheir Attouchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koutheir at gmail dot com
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48976
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48960
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-12-27
20:13:50 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Dec 27 20:13:35 2012
New Revision: 194738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194738
Log:
2012-12-27 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48976
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-12-27
19:24:47 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Dec 27 19:24:44 2012
New Revision: 194736
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194736
Log:
2012-12-27 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48976
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-12-27
18:09:20 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Dec 27 18:09:13 2012
New Revision: 194734
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194734
Log:
2012-12-27 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48976
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-12-27
18:07:39 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Dec 27 18:07:33 2012
New Revision: 194733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194733
Log:
2012-12-27 Jerry DeLisle
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55586
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55814
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2012-12-27
17:23:54 UTC ---
An even more pronounced test case, where we could sink
a lot more stores, which in fact could lead to moving
a whole loop:
logical function bar(a,b,c)
logical, intent(in)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
--- Comment #1 from Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de 2012-12-27
16:32:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29055
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29055
The testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
Bug #: 55817
Summary: void return value in std::vector::insert() c++11
should be an iterator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55816
Bug #: 55816
Summary: Options from command line are added to target arch
attribute eventhough they are in contradiction with
that target
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55812
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-27 09:38:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think Jason had proposed an attribute for these function calls but it was
> rejected IIRC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00024.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55764
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55712
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29039|0 |1
is obsolete|
26 matches
Mail list logo
