http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #45 from Kostya Serebryany 2012-12-23
07:44:32 UTC ---
>> The point of failure is not in the object,
>> but in a routine called after a routine from this object finishes.
What if you remove -fsanitize=address for that single
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2012-12-23
05:07:39 UTC ---
(gdb) bt
#0 gen_reg_rtx (mode=SImode) at ../../gcc/gcc/emit-rtl.c:859
#1 0x007957d4 in legitimize_tls_address (addr=0x412d6cd0)
at ../../gcc/gcc/config/pa/pa.c:937
#
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzilla-gcc at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53327
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52778
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53607
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53789
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55274
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52089
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin 2012-12-22
23:38:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 29033
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29033
Preprocessed source from r189365
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2012-12-22
23:35:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 29032
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29032
Preprocessed source from r189366
Compilation command:
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54728
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-22
23:27:54 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sat Dec 22 23:27:49 2012
New Revision: 194700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194700
Log:
PR lto/54728
* cgraph.h (symta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-22 23:20:37
UTC ---
> I'll give this patch a try and let you know how it affects the
> performance I see. But unrolling shouldn't affect inlining, since all
> unrolling is after inlining, right?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-22
23:06:42 UTC ---
Can you please attach random.i and what exact gcc options were used to compile
random.c ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2012-12-22
23:01:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 29031
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29031
.s file difference
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54120
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2012-12-22
23:00:21 UTC ---
As might have been expected, libgfortran/random.o differs between revisions
189365 and 189366. Even in the .i files, there are many differences. For
example,
# diff -u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55663
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #38 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-12-22 21:23:07 UTC ---
> Can you tell me what happens if you apply this patch?
The behavior stays unchanged;-(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341
--- Comment #44 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-12-22 20:53:41 UTC ---
I have made a some more progress in understanding the failure. I all compile
with
FCFLAGS = -O1 -g -ffree-form -fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer
$(DFLAGS)
I ge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55793
--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets 2012-12-22
20:44:32 UTC ---
85%+ of the time is spent in "var-tracking dataflow". This may just be a
duplicate of #54402 but the testcase there is different.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #37 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2012-12-22 20:16:07 UTC ---
Hi Dominique,
> The best I can do (without understanding it) is
>
> (1) if I use dtruss (should be equivalent to strace) on a, I get
>
> [macbook] f90/bug% 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-22 20:12:50
UTC ---
ASAN:SIGSEGV
=
==19402== ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x0008 (pc
0x0067ce31 sp 0x7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55794
Bug #: 55794
Summary: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/non-virtual-thunk.C -std=gnu++98
and -std=gnu++11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55793
Bug #: 55793
Summary: Compile hog with -gdwarf-4 and -O2 (-fvar-tracking
issue)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #36 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-12-22 19:13:23 UTC ---
> Can you strace (or whatever) the code and tell me what lseek()
> returns? Is it really EINVAL like the error message suggests?
The best I can do (without understand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-12-22
18:57:55 UTC ---
> but I finished bootstrap with the following patch
>
> --- ../_clean/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in2012-11-07
> 08:50:19.0 +0100
> +++ ../p_work/gcc/ada/gcc-i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-22
18:38:55 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 I have successfully bootstrapped revision 194694 with
the patches in comments #3 and #5, and configured with
../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2012-12-22 18:28:49
UTC ---
Most likely a dup of bug 323.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55792
Bug #: 55792
Summary: Bad memory access with profiledbootstrap and LTO
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-22
17:58:28 UTC ---
Works on the turnk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791
Bug #: 55791
Summary: gcc fails to detect wrong type in sizeof in malloc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55763
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-22
17:27:06 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 22 17:27:03 2012
New Revision: 194696
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194696
Log:
2012-12-21 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49241
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55790
Bug #: 55790
Summary: Build Failure on Head Targeting x86_64 Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55789
Bug #: 55789
Summary: Needless realloc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55311
--- Comment #3 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-12-22 16:09:18 UTC ---
A candidate patch for this was proposed to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01361.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52343
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-12-22 16:08:25 UTC ---
A candidate patch for this was proposed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg01312.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55788
Bug #: 55788
Summary: inlining failed in call to always_inline: mismatched
arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #35 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2012-12-22 15:38:08 UTC ---
> I still see
>
> status from open is0
> status from open is0
> At line 7 of file pr30162_1.f (unit = 20, file = 'np')
> Fortran ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55787
Bug #: 55787
Summary: Comparisons of double values don't work correctly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critica
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-12-22
12:46:02 UTC ---
> Try to add $GMPINC to INCLUDES & INCLUDES_FOR_SUBDIR in
> gcc-interface/Makefile.in
This leads to
make -C ../gcc/ada/tools -f ../Makefile \
"CC=../../xgcc -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55714
--- Comment #3 from piotr5 at netscape dot net 2012-12-22 12:11:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29026
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29026
the requested preprocessor output
youn probably are right it's a duplicate, usin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #34 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-12-22 12:02:52 UTC ---
I still see
status from open is0
status from open is0
At line 7 of file pr30162_1.f (unit = 20, file = 'np')
Fortran runtime error: Illegal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at libertysurf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Koenig 2012-12-22
10:46:42 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Dec 22 10:46:37 2012
New Revision: 194694
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194694
Log:
2012-12-22 Thomas Koenig
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55786
Bug #: 55786
Summary: g++ segmentation fault
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55784
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab 2012-12-22 08:57:46
UTC ---
Take a look at gcc/config.log.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-12-22 08:57:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> template
> inline
> Float atan(Float t) {
> constexpr float PIO4F = 0.7853981633974483096f;
> constexpr Float zero = {0};
> Float ret = ( t > 0.41421356
59 matches
Mail list logo
