[Bug fortran/55591] strict-aliasing & Fortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55591 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #13 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-19 06:49:50 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:41 PM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: >> >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug lto/55736] lto ICE: tree code ''junl is not supported in LTO streams

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55736 --- Comment #1 from Adam Borowski 2012-12-19 00:57:12 UTC --- Fails on armhf as well: lto1: internal compiler error: tree code ‘\�PF9F���G�P.�.lЕ�"0�+’ is not supported in LTO streams Works on i386.

[Bug c++/55737] Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-19 00:24:09 UTC --- I think GCC is correct here as for a?b:c to be an integer constant expression, all three (a, b, and c) have to be an integer constant expressions even if a is true or false.

[Bug c++/55737] New: Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737 Bug #: 55737 Summary: Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55721] -mabi=64 compilation results in unknown UNSPEC note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-19 00:04:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Actually the MIPS backend does have an UNSPEC 230. It is one of the > > SYMBOL_64_* unspecs. > > Then, why is symbol

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #12 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-18 22:49:20 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:41 PM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 > > --- Comment #11 fro

[Bug c/39464] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Attribute may_alias causes invalid warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39464 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 22:48:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 18 22:48:04 2012 New Revision: 194594 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194594 Log: PR c/39464 * c-typeck.c (conve

[Bug target/55721] -mabi=64 compilation results in unknown UNSPEC note

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55721 --- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-12-18 22:47:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Actually the MIPS backend does have an UNSPEC 230. It is one of the > SYMBOL_64_* unspecs. Then, why is symbol_type not defined within define_c_

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 22:41:13 UTC --- Teresa, I think this is what you were referring to, and the reason for my original patch: houston:/build/trunkboot$ ./install/bin/gcc a.c -fprofile-generate /home/build/tru

[Bug other/54814] [4.8 Regression] ICE: unable to find a register to spill in class 'R0_REG'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814 --- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-12-18 22:33:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 28990 [details] > Better patch > > Sorry for doing this, but here's a slightly improved version of the patch. > Does > th

[Bug go/55201] [4.8 regression] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201 --- Comment #5 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 22:07:43 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Tue Dec 18 22:07:38 2012 New Revision: 194593 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194593 Log: libgo: Link against libatomic_con

[Bug go/55201] [4.8 regression] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 22:04:13 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Tue Dec 18 22:04:08 2012 New Revision: 194592 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194592 Log: PR go/55201 * Makefile.a

[Bug libstdc++/54351] ~unique_ptr() should not set stored pointer to null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54351 --- Comment #11 from Geoff Romer 2012-12-18 21:59:23 UTC --- >From discussion on the C++ LWG reflector, it appears that the standard's requirements on library types are intended to apply only during their lifetime, although the standard do

[Bug target/55562] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-* on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 21:40:36 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 18 21:40:29 2012 New Revision: 194591 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194591 Log: PR target/55562 * sbitmap.c (bi

[Bug c/52991] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-12-18 21:35:27 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > It doesn't look to me that the first two hunks of the patch are needed. Yes, that's right. > The last hunk doesn't look like it should be considerin

[Bug lto/55736] New: lto ICE: tree code ''junl is not supported in LTO streams

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55736 Bug #: 55736 Summary: lto ICE: tree code ''junl is not supported in LTO streams Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55726] assignment of a scalar to a vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC|marc.glisse at ens dot fr |glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug rtl-optimization/55672] [4.8 Regression] -fstack-check=generic ICEs in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:13868

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #8 from

[Bug fortran/55735] ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-18 20:04:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Postscript: The example in comment 0 mixes a scalar and an array pointers. > > While the ICE occurs with either, the dec

[Bug target/55672] [4.8 Regression] -fstack-check=generic ICEs in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:13868

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-18 19:42:59 UTC --- LRA doesn't handle HARD_FRAME_POINTER_IS_FRAME_POINTER at all.

[Bug libstdc++/55727] better support for dynamic allocation of over-aligned types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727 Matthias Kretz changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #29002|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/55727] better support for dynamic allocation of over-aligned types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz 2012-12-18 18:20:00 UTC --- Created attachment 29002 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29002 support for over-aligned types in new_allocator I finished my allocator to fix the issue and it wa

[Bug c++/55724] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Default type of a template value is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55724 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/55562] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-* on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562 --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2012-12-18 17:30:55 UTC --- I did a quick test on powerpc-ibm-aix and the patch seems to fix the problem. You should have access to a lot of PPC systems for testing.

[Bug bootstrap/50148] GCC fails to bootstrap with -O3 due to "may be used uninitialized" errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50148 --- Comment #6 from Matt Hargett 2012-12-18 17:26:54 UTC --- Applying the supplied patch reveals another issue underneath, which is a false positive: /work/mhargett/gcc-trunk-obj/./prev-gcc/xg++ -B/work/mhargett/gcc-trunk-obj/./prev-gcc/ -B/u/m

[Bug gcov-profile/55674] [4.8 Regression] >20% size increase of lto/pgo binaries since r193747

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674 --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-18 17:25:37 UTC --- > I did some measurements with tramp3d and in this case > the default (999) gives the best performance: > > par. sizetime > > 999 955859 3.71752 >

[Bug tree-optimization/55683] [4.8 Regression] ICE in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-18 17:15:51 UTC --- Created attachment 29001 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29001 proposed patch OK, we know the argument is constant unit size

[Bug c/52991] attribute packed broken on mingw32?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52991 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug gcov-profile/55674] [4.8 Regression] >20% size increase of lto/pgo binaries since r193747

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-12-18 17:03:52 UTC --- I did some measurements with tramp3d and in this case the default (999) gives the best performance: par. sizetime 999 955859 3.71752 990

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 16:48:40 UTC --- Ah yes, now I remember. Yes, there is a problem with libgcov.a. I wasn't seeing it because I was only building cc1. You are correct Teresa, that is the reason for the gym

[Bug fortran/55735] ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/53732] [4.7/4.8 Regression] "mismatching comparison operand types" on compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53732 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pmarguinaud at hotmail dot

[Bug tree-optimization/55683] [4.8 Regression] ICE in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-18 16:39:47 UTC --- OK, we are inlining Inline summary for bool C::c1(float, float)/7 inlinable self time: 34 global time: 34 self size: 18 global size: 18 self st

[Bug fortran/55729] Problem with sum intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resoluti

[Bug debug/54731] [4.8 regression] arm-elf/arm-eabisim crosses fails in make-check due to undefined LFE references: corrupt debug_line tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #9 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-18 16:31:08 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:25 AM, aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 > > Aldy Hernandez changed: > >What

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #28999|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/55729] Problem with sum intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729 --- Comment #2 from pmarguinaud at hotmail dot com 2012-12-18 16:25:01 UTC --- Hi Tobias, I use gfortran 4.7.0. It was build and installed by our admin, as you can see below : $ gfortran -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gfortran

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #7 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-18 16:24:13 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 7:53 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 > > --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #11 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 16:22:11 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 18 16:21:57 2012 New Revision: 194586 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194586 Log: PR other/54324 * doc/install.

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 16:19:33 UTC --- Created attachment 28999 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28999 proposed patch Oh, I didn't realize we always had the HWI variants available (inlined in

[Bug fortran/55729] Problem with sum intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/55735] ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/55733] -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/55735] New: ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55735 Bug #: 55735 Summary: ICE with deferred-length strings in COMMON Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-c

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 15:53:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > In that thread, I had asked: > > > > --- > > If you prefer, I can simply inline the popcount/clz functionality into

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 15:52:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > In that thread, I had asked: > > --- > If you prefer, I can simply inline the popcount/clz functionality into > gcov-io.c directly (or at least w

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #3 from Teresa Johnson 2012-12-18 15:49:03 UTC --- In that thread, I had asked: --- If you prefer, I can simply inline the popcount/clz functionality into gcov-io.c directly (or at least when not using recent versions of GC

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 15:45:17 UTC --- I have a proposed patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00766.html ...which was deemed not sexy at all. So perhaps Richard or someone else can suggest

[Bug gcov-profile/55674] [4.8 Regression] >20% size increase of lto/pgo binaries since r193747

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55674 --- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-18 15:40:34 UTC --- > It's hard to say in case of Firefox, because the only thing > that one can reliably measure is the JavaScript performance. > And this varies only very slightly with different c

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] [4.8 Regression] gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/55731] Issue with complete innermost loop unrolling (cunrolli)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/55728] std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug gcov-profile/55734] New: gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55734 Bug #: 55734 Summary: gcov-io.c uses builtins not available in non-GCC compilers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/55436] g++ compiles invalid code with child class of nested class in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-12-18 15:29:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > > If it was a serious problem it would have been reported before by more > > people. > > I'm not sure if the degree of popularity of a bug should

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 15:26:50 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 18 15:26:27 2012 New Revision: 194584 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194584 Log: PR other/54324 * tree-ssa-coa

[Bug fortran/55733] -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-18 15:24:16 UTC --- The following test case also fails; I think the problem is the string components which isn't marked as TREE_STATIC: ! { dg-do run } ! { dg-options "-fno-automatic" } ! subr

[Bug middle-end/55045] ira.c:879:32: error: array subscript is above array bounds (for vax)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55045 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/55730] [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:12725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/55732] -fno-automatic: Doesn'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55732 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/55733] -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-12-18 15:20:40 UTC --- *** Bug 55732 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/54324] [4.8 Regression] GCC install document does not list minimum required g++ version

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54324 --- Comment #9 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-12-18 15:19:55 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Dec 18 15:19:43 2012 New Revision: 194583 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194583 Log: PR other/54324 * ansidecl.h (A

[Bug fortran/55733] New: -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55733 Bug #: 55733 Summary: -fno-automatic: Fails for scalar allocatables Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/52588] false warning: array subscript is above array bounds: number of elements is 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52588 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/54731] [4.8 regression] arm-elf/arm-eabisim crosses fails in make-check due to undefined LFE references: corrupt debug_line tables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54731 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot g

[Bug fortran/55732] New: -fno-automatic: Doesn'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55732 Bug #: 55732 Summary: -fno-automatic: Doesn' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/53198] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc wrongly emits "array subscript is above array bounds" for simple arrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53198 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0 Known to fail|4.7.0, 4.8.0

[Bug sanitizer/55679] new asan tests from r194458 fail on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55679 --- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth 2012-12-18 15:15:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) I am puzzled as to why this issue with global-overflow-1.c and stack-overflow-1.c can't be triggered on x86_64 linux. The obvious change of -mtune=c

[Bug target/55672] [4.8 Regression] -fstack-check=generic ICEs in print_reg, at config/i386/i386.c:13868

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55672 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-12-18 15:11:38 UTC --- This is what we changed in reload for stack realignment: diff --git a/gcc/reload1.c b/gcc/reload1.c index f28b01c..9b81062 100644 --- a/gcc/reload1.c +++ b/gcc/reload1.c @@ -3663

[Bug c++/55724] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] Default type of a template value is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55724 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3 --- Comment #2 from Rich

[Bug c++/55436] g++ compiles invalid code with child class of nested class in template class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436 Conrad changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.7.2 |4.8.0 --- Comment #6 from Conrad 2012

[Bug target/55565] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/ppc-mov-1.c scan-assembler-not fmr [0-9]+,[0-9]+

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55565 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug debug/55730] [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:12725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 14:51:11 UTC --- Reduced with a cross from x86_64 configured with --target=powerpc64-suse-linux --with-cpu-64=power4 --enable-secureplt --with-long-double-128 --enable-languages=c,c++ type

[Bug target/55642] [4.8 Regression] Invalid thumb code generated ("thumb conditional instruction should be in IT block")

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55642 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug go/55201] [4.8 regression] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54838] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in merge_latch_edges, at cfgloop.c:678 with -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/54838] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in merge_latch_edges, at cfgloop.c:678 with -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54838 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 14:39:55 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Dec 18 14:39:49 2012 New Revision: 194582 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194582 Log: 2012-12-18 Richard Biener

[Bug debug/55730] [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:12725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 14:37:47 UTC --- Reducing.

[Bug go/55201] [4.8 regression] libgo.so: undefined reference to `__atomic_compare_exchange_8'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55201 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-18 14:28:31 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Tue Dec 18 14:28:24 2012 New Revision: 194581 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194581 Log: libgo: Link against libatomic.

[Bug tree-optimization/55731] Issue with complete innermost loop unrolling (cunrolli)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2012-12-18 14:24:05 UTC --- Created attachment 28998 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28998 testcase2

[Bug tree-optimization/55731] Issue with complete innermost loop unrolling (cunrolli)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev 2012-12-18 14:23:30 UTC --- Created attachment 28997 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28997 testcase1

[Bug tree-optimization/55731] New: Issue with complete innermost loop unrolling (cunrolli)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55731 Bug #: 55731 Summary: Issue with complete innermost loop unrolling (cunrolli) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/55730] [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:12725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|debug Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/55730] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:12725

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55730 Bug #: 55730 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:12725 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug target/55562] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-* on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 13:47:34 UTC --- Can somebody please test this on ppc? I'll bootstrap/regtest it on x86_64-linux and i686-linux momentarily.

[Bug target/55562] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-* on powerpc*-*-*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55562 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unas

[Bug tree-optimization/55683] [4.8 Regression] ICE in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683 --- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2012-12-18 13:39:45 UTC --- > Bumping the limit to assert on to off-by-two doesn't fix all cases (I can > hand you a testcase if you like...) Yep, i guess it just depends on how many calls we diverge. I w

[Bug middle-end/55555] [4.8 Regression] miscompilation at -O2 (number_of_iterations)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/55727] better support for dynamic allocation of over-aligned types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55727 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz 2012-12-18 13:26:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Right now it does not even suffice to reimplement new/delete inside Foo to > > make > > std::vector work. > > Sorry

[Bug middle-end/55555] [4.8 Regression] miscompilation at -O2 (number_of_iterations)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 13:12:39 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Dec 18 13:12:34 2012 New Revision: 194578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=194578 Log: 2012-12-18 Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/55683] [4.8 Regression] ICE in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:270

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55683 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener 2012-12-18 12:46:52 UTC --- Bumping the limit to assert on to off-by-two doesn't fix all cases (I can hand you a testcase if you like...)

[Bug c/55695] Miscompilation of pow() & sqrt() using musl libc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55695 ojab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/55729] New: Problem with sum intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55729 Bug #: 55729 Summary: Problem with sum intrinsic Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/55728] New: std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55728 Bug #: 55728 Summary: std::bad_function_call has misleading what() result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:12:32 UTC --- > --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 > 12:09:52 UTC --- > If you don't add that /vol/gcc-4.4/lib/ to ld.so.conf (or ld.so.conf.d), it is > your

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 12:09:52 UTC --- If you don't add that /vol/gcc-4.4/lib/ to ld.so.conf (or ld.so.conf.d), it is your responsibility to build with LD_LIBRARY_PATH, otherwise you are bootstrapping with a non-wor

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-12-18 12:06:21 UTC --- > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-12-18 > 10:30:12 UTC --- > So not a bug then? I don't think so: even on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, when building

[Bug c++/55726] assignment of a scalar to a vector

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55726 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente 2012-12-18 11:39:22 UTC --- no gcc -Ofast -march=corei7 assign.c -std=c99 assign.c: In function ‘main’: assign.c:9:21: error: incompatible types when initializing type ‘float32x4_t’ using type ‘float’

[Bug rtl-optimization/55717] [4.8 Regression] ICE in form_sum, at reload.c:5400

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55717 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >