http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55456
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
--- Comment #5 from Gaetano Mendola 2012-11-24
06:57:16 UTC ---
I have no problem to pay someone, I'm a bit disappointed seeing a bug closed
because "new version works" without investigate if the problem is still there
in new versions but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-24
06:37:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Time to adopt ICC.
There is only so much resources to support older versions of GCC. If you want
support for older versions of GCC, then you shoul
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
--- Comment #3 from Gaetano Mendola 2012-11-24
06:27:06 UTC ---
Time to adopt ICC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55455
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-24
01:52:49 UTC ---
And it's mine because I caused it with the fix for PR45385 :(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
Summary|array n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55455
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-24
01:13:07 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sat Nov 24 01:12:59 2012
New Revision: 193775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193775
Log:
Don't pass void to fegetround
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55456
Bug #: 55456
Summary: [4.8 Regression] 454.calculix in SPEC CPU 2006 is
miscompiled
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55455
Bug #: 55455
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Failed to bootstrap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55313
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52680
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-23
22:11:30 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Nov 23 22:11:23 2012
New Revision: 193769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193769
Log:
PR libstdc++/52680
* acinclud
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55171
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wriabi at email dot com
--- Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55367
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55367
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||blitzmunter at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55453
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55453
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-23
21:44:57 UTC ---
target/55171 ? (and we may already have yet another related issue)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55450
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55450
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-23
21:14:09 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Nov 23 21:14:05 2012
New Revision: 193767
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193767
Log:
Set gcc_version in tsan/Makefile.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55454
Bug #: 55454
Summary: [PPC] unaligned memory accesses do not work correctly
for vector extensions when using altivec
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55453
Bug #: 55453
Summary: Bug with virtual methods and objects with dtors.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-23 20:32:35
UTC ---
I still got the same failure as in comment #13 with revision
193763.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-23 19:05:20 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Fri Nov 23 19:05:14 2012
New Revision: 193766
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193766
Log:
2012-11-23 Janus Weil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55452
Bug #: 55452
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: gfortran.dg/reassoc_4.f -O
scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
--- Comment #1 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-23 17:41:44 UTC ---
Created attachment 28766
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28766
reduced preprocessed input that causes the failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55451
Bug #: 55451
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55448
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55450
Bug #: 55450
Summary: libtool: install: error: cannot install `libtsan.la'
to a directory not ending in
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Jo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #14 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-23
16:05:48 UTC ---
gcc 4.5.4 does not suffer from the problem compiling the attached repro code,
indicating this is a 4.6 regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-23
16:04:14 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 23 16:04:03 2012
New Revision: 193762
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193762
Log:
PR c++/54046
* Makefile.in (gim
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-23
16:00:35 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 23 16:00:26 2012
New Revision: 193760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193760
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/55388
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55449
Bug #: 55449
Summary: [4.4.3] pure virtual call only with -O1/2/3
(boost::optional)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55418
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55418
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-23 15:34:51 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Nov 23 15:34:45 2012
New Revision: 193758
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193758
Log:
2012-11-23 Markus Trippelsdo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55448
Bug #: 55448
Summary: using const-reference SSE or AVX types leads to
unnecessary unaligned loads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55430
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-23
15:13:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 23 15:12:58 2012
New Revision: 193757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193757
Log:
PR middle-end/55430
* gcc.dg/pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55447
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54774
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-23
14:49:24 UTC ---
*** Bug 55447 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39102
--- Comment #2 from Jens Maurer 2012-11-23
14:07:34 UTC ---
Here is another test case:
struct S {
unsigned char * p;
unsigned char * limit;
};
S g(S s);
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) S f(S s, unsigned int n);
S f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55358
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-11-23 13:08:54 UTC ---
A new one:
==2442== Invalid write of size 8
==2442==at 0x672DF6: iterative_hash_canonical_type(tree_node*, unsigned
int) (gimple.c:3170)
==2442==by 0xD3F4A0: h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55447
Bug #: 55447
Summary: insufficient debug info for strong typed enum
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
Konstantin Serebryany changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #10 from Konstantin Serebryany 2012-11-23 12:44:14 UTC ---
libsanitizer/README.gcc was updated, and libsanitizer/merge.sh was create to
help with merges.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
--- Comment #28 from Konstantin Serebryany 2012-11-23 11:14:58 UTC ---
Note that today's upstream tsan sources don't link with -fPIC at all
because our assembly blobs are not PIC-friendly.
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/tsan_rtl_thread.o: relocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #9 from Konstantin Serebryany 2012-11-23 10:56:44 UTC ---
Not that today's upstream tsan sources don't link with -fPIC at all
because our assembly blobs are not PIC-friendly.
/usr/bin/ld: .libs/tsan_rtl_thread.o: relocation R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55446
Bug #: 55446
Summary: array new with size zero vanishes from object code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
--- Comment #27 from Konstantin Serebryany 2012-11-23 10:47:14 UTC ---
>> is it really so crucial that you'd want to make another libtsan_pie.a for it?
I would actually prefer to have *only* libtsan_pie.a, and not bother with .so
version at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-11-23
10:08:54 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Nov 23 10:08:49 2012
New Revision: 193749
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193749
Log:
PR testsuite/52641
* gcc.dg/un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55435
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-23
09:02:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 23 09:02:28 2012
New Revision: 193748
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193748
Log:
PR sanitizer/55435
* c-common.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
--- Comment #26 from Dmitry Vyukov 2012-11-23
08:34:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Have you considered using __builtin_expect to help the compiler in the
> performance sensitive code? Or even better would be profile-feedback, buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-23
08:20:40 UTC ---
Have you considered using __builtin_expect to help the compiler in the
performance sensitive code? Or even better would be profile-feedback, build
libtsan once, run some bench
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-23
08:13:11 UTC ---
When I rebuild libtsan with -fPIE instead of -fPIC in the Makefile, and
g++ -shared -Wl,--whole-archive -o libtsanx.so libtsan.a -ldl -lpthread
(note that .libs/*.o are still b
67 matches
Mail list logo