http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Ivchenko 2012-11-21
07:48:23 UTC ---
I tried to narrow down the problem and changed the test a little bit.
(The relative order of declarations remains the same; Just grouped the coupled
declarations)
This cha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Ivchenko 2012-11-21
07:46:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28751
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28751
Simple reproducer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354
--- Comment #18 from Dmitry Vyukov 2012-11-21
07:45:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> >When building libtsan as a shared library (for which I had to hack our
> >assembly
> >blobs a bit) we get two sources of slowdown:
> > 1. __tsa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417
--- Comment #2 from Teresa Johnson 2012-11-21
05:51:12 UTC ---
The following patch should fix it. I am running regression testing
now, but am leaving town imminently for several days and can send the
patch for review when I get back Sunday
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 05:45:51 UTC ---
Test code added.
Compile with
powerpc-eabispe-gcc -fshort-double -flto=jobserver -nostdlib -o test eqadc_E.c
to reproduce the bug.
Looks like it is related to -f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 05:44:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 28750
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28750
Test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55423
Bug #: 55423
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
string_cst, have error_mark in finish_static_assert,
at cp/semantics.c:5170
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Serebryany 2012-11-21 04:23:21 UTC ---
>> Why do you want to bother with a ChangeLog?
I don't.
I would prefer to simply mention the upstream revision to which was the last
sync.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose 2012-11-21
04:18:46 UTC ---
Created attachment 28749
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28749
preprocessed source
attached, for arm-linux-gnueabihf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53475
--- Comment #5 from Andre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-21
04:10:18 UTC ---
Can you provide the preprocessed source?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55395
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose 2012-11-21
04:07:53 UTC ---
this seems to be a configuration issue. the plain cvs build does succeed,
however if you turn on -fstack-protector by default, the build fails.
this is the patch I'm using to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55411
--- Comment #3 from jk3064 2012-11-21 03:20:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 28748
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28748
pthread only testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
--- Comment #6 from Paol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 03:12:20 UTC ---
Preprocessed source added.
Compile with:
powerpc-eabispe-gcc -fno-builtin -fshort-double -Os -flto=jobserver -std=gnu99
-nostdlib -fuse-linker-plugin -o test etpu_por
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 03:11:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28747
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28747
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 03:05:26 UTC ---
Compiling with -O0 changes the ICE to:
internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3435
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 03:04:27 UTC ---
Please ignore my last comment. It was meant for bug 55113.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55112
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 02:58:22 UTC ---
Compiling with -O0 changes the ICE to:
internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3435
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55113
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Oppenlander
2012-11-21 02:33:28 UTC ---
My apologies -- I haven't been receiving notification emails from bugzilla for
some reason so I didn't see your comments.
I'll attach the preprocessed source in a few mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-21 02:26:56 UTC ---
On 20-Nov-12, at 7:06 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can't reproduce that with a cross. The tree optimizers definitely
> don't
> optimize it into abort,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55411
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-21
02:13:37 UTC ---
Can you create a testcase which uses pthread_* directly?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-21
00:41:19 UTC ---
We regressed with r175639, the implementation of DR 990:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg01130.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55422
--- Comment #1 from cookevillain at yahoo dot com 2012-11-20 23:55:16 UTC ---
gcc -v output, omitted in the report:
-
Using built-in specs.
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55422
Bug #: 55422
Summary: gcc does not diagnose change of linkage for a
function.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
Targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-11-20
23:44:52 UTC ---
I think this was fixed by:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00621.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421
Bug #: 55421
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust _address_1, at
emit-rtl.c:2180
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55420
Bug #: 55420
Summary: Gcc produces an internal compiler error (nested
function with variably modified return)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630
--- Comment #15 from Larry Baker 2012-11-20 22:24:46
UTC ---
Jakub,
I undertand the reason for the --with-host-libstdcxx option. The documentation
for --with-host-libstdcxx doesn't say anything about the side effect of
changing the LIN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419
Bug #: 55419
Summary: internal compiler error: in
gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3587
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-11-20
22:21:45 UTC ---
It's caused by r193599:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00546.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55418
Bug #: 55418
Summary: Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value(s) in implicitly_declare_fn()
method.c:1623
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55396
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-11-20
21:33:12 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 20 21:32:59 2012
New Revision: 193678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193678
Log:
2012-11-20 Vladimir Makarov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-11-20 21:06:46 UTC ---
Valgrind shows:
% /var/tmp/gcc_valgrind/usr/local/bin/g++ -w -fprofile-use -O3
/home/markus/bench.cpp
==522== Conditional jump or mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785
--- Comment #34 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-11-20
21:00:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Would be possible to double check if this problem is still fixed after the fix
> to the tree-ssa-pre patch?
Unfortunately the regression happened
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-20
20:19:58 UTC ---
It is intentionally that way, so that one can fine tune the C++ libraries
linked into the binary with --with-host-libstdcxx, but you are responsible for
specifying there all th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630
--- Comment #13 from Larry Baker 2012-11-20 19:57:41
UTC ---
Jakub,
The root of the problem is because GCC required a C++ linker, but the logic in
gcc/Makefile forces the linker to be $(CC) when HOST_LIBS are specified:
# The name of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 19:53:10 UTC ---
I optimistically included this PR in the changelog,
but please let me know if the patch doesn't in fact
fix the ICE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resoluti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 19:49:39 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Nov 20 19:49:26 2012
New Revision: 193674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193674
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 19:49:38 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Nov 20 19:49:26 2012
New Revision: 193674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193674
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-20
19:08:21 UTC ---
I just tried and r175673 also rejects the reduced code in Comment #1. Let's see
if I can find the exact revision where we regressed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417
Bug #: 55417
Summary: [4.8 Regression] AddressSanitizer reports
stack-buffer-overflow in profiling code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329
wbrana changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-11-20
18:28:30 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Nov 20 18:28:09 2012
New Revision: 193672
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193672
Log:
PR tree-optimization/55350
* g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55416
Bug #: 55416
Summary: New tests g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-17.2.C (et al) fail
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-20
18:16:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Assuming fixed.
>
> Well yes! Maybe we should clear the issue on who's supposed to close PR's
> after a fix?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-20
18:11:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I don't have access to old compilers locally. I'm trying with a cross from
> one
> of the sparc boxes in the farm that has gcc 4.3.2.
Revisi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55213
Joshua Conner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josh.m.conner at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:02:49 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Nov 20 18:02:36 2012
New Revision: 193671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193671
Log:
2012-11-20 Uros Bizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2012-11-20
17:43:37 UTC ---
This problem no longer exists at r193669 on x86_64-apple-darwin12 with Xcode
4.5.2 so it appears that...
r193667 | dnovillo | 2012-11-20 11:26:09 -0500 (Tue, 20 Nov 2012) | 26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770
--- Comment #8 from Andy Jost 2012-11-20
17:14:18 UTC ---
The workaround I mentioned in comment #5 does seem to do the trick.
Specifically, something like this works in all the cases I've tried:
struct MainNode : Node
{
virtua
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415
--- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson 2012-11-20
17:08:15 UTC ---
The call to get_pointer_alignment_1 at ipa-prop.c:2959
does not do what the author intended. In particular we
really really need to notice the "false" return value
when th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415
Bug #: 55415
Summary: Early SRA produces unaligned complex types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381
--- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo 2012-11-20
16:50:00 UTC ---
I don't have access to old compilers locally. I'm trying with a cross from one
of the sparc boxes in the farm that has gcc 4.3.2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2012-11-20
16:34:20 UTC ---
I now suspect you're missing --with-long-double-128, which would have been
auto-detected given alpha glibc headers in --with-sysroot, as I have.
Proposed patch here:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
--- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo 2012-11-20
16:26:24 UTC ---
Author: dnovillo
Date: Tue Nov 20 16:26:09 2012
New Revision: 193667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193667
Log:
Convert vec<> into a POD.
This fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz 2012-11-20 16:17:30
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Nov 20 16:17:16 2012
New Revision: 193666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193666
Log:
PR target/55268
* i386.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-20
16:02:33 UTC ---
I don't see how. The thing is, e.g. lower_stmt resets data->cannot_fallthru on
most of the statements, even if it got changed to reset it only on
GIMPLE_LABELs (or few selected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #9 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-20
15:45:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Note that, as I said already, I can't reproduce anywhere, not even in current
> 4_6-branch (on x86_64-linux -m32). Did you actually try it?
I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
--- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-11-20
15:26:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Assuming fixed.
Well yes! Maybe we should clear the issue on who's supposed to close PR's
after a fix? I'd be happy to do it for PR's I've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351
--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák 2012-11-20 15:15:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The first hunk of the patch that adds:
>
>MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS = *m5-64media* *m5-64media-nofpu*
>
> to gcc/config/sh/t-linux causes the sh-linux-gnu build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351
--- Comment #2 from dhowells at redhat dot com
2012-11-20 15:09:42 UTC ---
The first hunk of the patch that adds:
MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS = *m5-64media* *m5-64media-nofpu*
to gcc/config/sh/t-linux causes the sh-linux-gnu build to fail.
Offerta limitata, VODAFONE
per un anno intero al costo di 15,00 euro di spesa
ricevi SMART 1000+ comprende :
1000 minuti gratis al giorno verso i numeri Vodafone.
1000 minuti gratis al mese verso tutti i numeri.
Internet 5 GB mese,
SMS illimitati Vodafone e 2500 sms verso tutti mese
http://w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 14:54:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 20 14:54:36 2012
New Revision: 193664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193664
Log:
2012-11-20 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-11-20 14:54:22 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 20 14:54:11 2012
New Revision: 193663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193663
Log:
2012-11-20 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55414
Bug #: 55414
Summary: spec2006 416.gamess compilation fails on LRA
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387
Diego Novillo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413
--- Comment #1 from David Abdurachmanov
2012-11-20 14:07:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 28743
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28743
Testcase used.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413
Bug #: 55413
Summary: [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used
uninitialized in this function
[-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab 2012-11-20 13:01:31
UTC ---
Also broken on ia64 with gcc 4.3.2.
/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/
-B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/lib/ -isystem
/usr/ia6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-20
11:43:27 UTC ---
I believe the expensive part here is the EH, we end up with > 56000 nested
try/finally constructs. With -fno-exceptions this compiles in reasonable time
(even for the insane te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2012-11-20
11:20:47 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Nov 20 11:20:41 2012
New Revision: 193657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193657
Log:
2012-11-20 Martin Jambor
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412
Bug #: 55412
Summary: pr47276.c fails with -fpic option.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
