[Bug target/41202] -mno-mmx doesn't turn off sse*

2012-11-17 Thread kl4yfd at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41202 kl4yfd at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kl4yfd at gmail dot com

[Bug other/55376] [asan] libsanitizer/README.gcc must contain the exact steps to do code changes and to port code from upstream

2012-11-17 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376 davidxl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com --- Comme

[Bug debug/51358] [4.8 Regression] incorrect/missing location for function arg, -O0, without VTA

2012-11-17 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51358 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0 Summary|incorre

[Bug other/55376] New: [asan] libsanitizer/README.gcc must contain the exact steps to do code changes and to port code from upstream

2012-11-17 Thread konstantin.s.serebryany at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376 Bug #: 55376 Summary: [asan] libsanitizer/README.gcc must contain the exact steps to do code changes and to port code from upstream Classification: Unclassified

[Bug debug/54693] VTA guality issues with loops

2012-11-17 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693 --- Comment #21 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-11-18 01:56:04 UTC --- This doesn't look like something the bugfix may have caused, but rather as some latent bug exposed by that patch, like the latent bug fixed in comment 7. Anyway, a preproces

[Bug other/55375] libsanitizer license incomplete

2012-11-17 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55375 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose 2012-11-18 01:31:45 UTC --- and this should be removed: Copyrights and Licenses for Third Party Software Distributed with LLVM: not included in GCC.

[Bug other/55374] [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
ystem-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/gcc-4.8.0 --with-local-prefix=/usr/local --enable-gnu-indirect-function --disable-werror --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --with-fpmath=sse Thread model: posix gcc version 4.8.0 20121117 (experimental) (GCC) COMPILER

[Bug other/55375] libsanitizer license incomplete

2012-11-17 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55375 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug other/55375] New: libsanitizer license incomplete

2012-11-17 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55375 Bug #: 55375 Summary: libsanitizer license incomplete Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug other/55374] [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-18 01:18:07 UTC --- -Bstatic -lasan -Bdynamic must be placed before -Bstatic -lstdc++ -Bdynamic.

[Bug other/55374] New: [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55374 Bug #: 55374 Summary: [asan] Can't link static libasan with static libstdc++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/55373] New: Partial ordering of variadic function template

2012-11-17 Thread zeratul976 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55373 Bug #: 55373 Summary: Partial ordering of variadic function template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/55372] New: MIPS: Loading integer constants to floating-pointer registers generates suboptimal code

2012-11-17 Thread stevenbaker94 at rocketmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55372 Bug #: 55372 Summary: MIPS: Loading integer constants to floating-pointer registers generates suboptimal code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug middle-end/55371] New: [asan] False -Werror=uninitialized

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55371 Bug #: 55371 Summary: [asan] False -Werror=uninitialized Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

2012-11-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-17 23:31:22 UTC --- > Does it happen with a recent bootstrap compiler, i.e. for which > -static-libstdc++ is implemented, if you don't set --with-host-libstdcxx? I > think it's 4.6 and above for S

[Bug c++/55367] Probably problem with c++ vptr under templates and multiple inheritance

2012-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55367 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug c++/55365] internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_union, at cp/typeck2.c:1335; internal compiler error: in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:387; internal compiler error: in process_in

2012-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55365 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-17 23:17:59 UTC --- *** Bug 55366 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/55366] g++ segfault; see also Bug 55365

2012-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55366 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|jaso

[Bug bootstrap/55370] [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55370 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0

[Bug bootstrap/55370] New: [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55370 Bug #: 55370 Summary: [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug tree-optimization/55236] [4.8 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr22493-1.c FAILs with -fPIC

2012-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55236 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-17 22:00:37 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Nov 17 22:00:32 2012 New Revision: 193591 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193591 Log: PR tree-optimization/55236 * fo

[Bug testsuite/55188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19105.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 "Optimizing range tests v_[0-9]*.D. -.2, 2. and -.3, 4.[\n\r]* into" 1

2012-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55188 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-17 21:58:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Nov 17 21:58:44 2012 New Revision: 193590 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193590 Log: PR testsuite/55188 * gcc.dg/pr1

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

2012-11-17 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug other/55354] [asan] by default, the asan run-time should be linked statically, not dynamically

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55354 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-17 20:35:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Answering my own question: we can get static linking with > -Wl,-Bstatic -lasan -Wl,-Bdynamic -ldl -lpthread > The -static-libasan option was added

[Bug middle-end/55369] New: expmed.c is miscompiled in stage1 bootstrap at -O1

2012-11-17 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55369 Bug #: 55369 Summary: expmed.c is miscompiled in stage1 bootstrap at -O1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/55342] [4.8 Regression] [LRA,x86] Non-optimal code for simple loop with LRA

2012-11-17 Thread vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55342 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-11-17 17:59:41 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Sat Nov 17 17:59:35 2012 New Revision: 193588 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193588 Log: 2012-11-17 Vladimir Makarov

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-17 17:30:25 UTC --- It can be reproduced with LTO bootstrap on hjl/valgrind branch at http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=summary with --enable-checking=valgrind.

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-17 17:20:19 UTC --- There is a bad memory access in LTO.

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/55368] New: Comma before semicolon in struct definition is not rejected

2012-11-17 Thread joerg at netbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55368 Bug #: 55368 Summary: Comma before semicolon in struct definition is not rejected Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-17 16:30:20 UTC --- ==17631== Invalid read of size 8 ==17631==at 0x6B2522: output_symtab() (lto-cgraph.c:589) ==17631==by 0x6B87B5: lto_output() (lto-streamer-out.c:1000) ==17631==by 0x6E230

[Bug c++/55367] New: Probably problem with c++ vptr under templates and multiple ihenritance

2012-11-17 Thread wriabi at email dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55367 Bug #: 55367 Summary: Probably problem with c++ vptr under templates and multiple ihenritance Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Statu

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-17 16:15:50 UTC --- When I add --db-attach=yes, valgrind doesn't report any error.

[Bug c++/55365] internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_union, at cp/typeck2.c:1335; internal compiler error: in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:387; internal compiler error: in process_in

2012-11-17 Thread jasongross9+bugzilla at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55365 --- Comment #2 from Jason 2012-11-17 16:10:21 UTC --- And, indeed, here's a somewhat smaller working example, which g++ says "internal compiler error: in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:387", and icpc says "error: a designator into a templa

[Bug c++/55365] internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_union, at cp/typeck2.c:1335; internal compiler error: in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:387; internal compiler error: in process_in

2012-11-17 Thread jasongross9+bugzilla at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55365 --- Comment #1 from Jason 2012-11-17 16:04:49 UTC --- Note that icpc gives me the error message "error: a designator into a template-dependent type is not allowed" on code similar to this, which seems like it might be related. The code

[Bug bootstrap/54795] [4.8 Regression] Random profiledbootstrap failure with LTO

2012-11-17 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54795 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-17 15:47:56 UTC --- [hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.c int main () { } [hjl@gnu-mic-2 gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -flto /tmp/x.c ==17373== Invalid read of size 8 ==17373==at 0x8E3FE6: streamer_pack_tree

[Bug c++/55366] New: g++ segfault; see also Bug 55365

2012-11-17 Thread jasongross9+bugzilla at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55366 Bug #: 55366 Summary: g++ segfault; see also Bug 55365 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/55365] New: internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_union, at cp/typeck2.c:1335; internal compiler error: in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:387; internal compiler error: in proce

2012-11-17 Thread jasongross9+bugzilla at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55365 Bug #: 55365 Summary: internal compiler error: in process_init_constructor_union, at cp/typeck2.c:1335; internal compiler error: in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #12 from wbrana 2012-11-17 15:01:34 UTC --- more exact CFLAGS -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -O3 -funroll-loops -g0 -march=corei7 -ffast-math -fno-PIE -fno-exceptions -fno-stack-protector -static

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #11 from wbrana 2012-11-17 14:52:44 UTC --- It seems I was wrong. Reverting 175752 doesn't fix performance. I used also Gentoo patches with patch which reverts 175752. I thought that it isn't possible, but it seems some of Gen

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #10 from wbrana 2012-11-17 14:30:22 UTC --- Created attachment 28719 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28719 build log from broken gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #9 from wbrana 2012-11-17 14:29:20 UTC --- Created attachment 28718 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28718 build log from non-broken gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #8 from wbrana 2012-11-17 14:26:18 UTC --- Created attachment 28717 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28717 Gentoo patches 3

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #7 from wbrana 2012-11-17 14:25:23 UTC --- Created attachment 28716 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28716 Gentoo patches 2

[Bug tree-optimization/55286] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10% slower

2012-11-17 Thread wbrana at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286 --- Comment #6 from wbrana 2012-11-17 14:24:44 UTC --- Created attachment 28715 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28715 Gentoo patches 1

[Bug libstdc++/55041] prettyprinting/shared_ptr & cxx11 fails on some platforms

2012-11-17 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55041 --- Comment #14 from Mark Wielaard 2012-11-17 13:27:03 UTC --- >> dwarf2out.c: For DWARF 4+, output DW_AT_high_pc as constant offset. >> >> >> This required a gdb change. > > Ah, that should be in http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/change

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

2012-11-17 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-17 13:03:01 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Nov 17 13:02:56 2012 New Revision: 193585 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193585 Log: PR fortran/55341 * trans-intrin

[Bug tree-optimization/55260] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_get_parm_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:263 with -O2 -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone

2012-11-17 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260 --- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2012-11-17 12:45:05 UTC --- Even though they both lead to the same ICE, the testcase in the summary and the one from comment #2 are actually caused by different bugs in ipa-cp.c. I have just submitted t

[Bug debug/54693] VTA guality issues with loops

2012-11-17 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693 --- Comment #20 from Andreas Tobler 2012-11-17 12:36:16 UTC --- Just for clarification, the following commits (after #14) in this PR did not resolve the bootstrap issue. I was on r193501 when I first encountered the comparison failure and

[Bug fortran/55341] address-sanitizer and Fortran

2012-11-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55341 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17 12:15:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Untested fix. memcpy's last argument is size_type_node, i.e. unsigned C > size_t, while in several places the FE was calling memcpy with a s

[Bug libstdc++/55363] tuple_size is not a class template

2012-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55363 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/55363] tuple_size is not a class template

2012-11-17 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55363 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17 12:10:08 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Nov 17 12:09:58 2012 New Revision: 193584 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193584 Log: 2012-11-17 Paolo Carlini

[Bug libstdc++/55363] tuple_size is not a class template

2012-11-17 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55363 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/55364] New: ICE: in remove_addr_table_entry, at dwarf2out.c:4201 with -O -gsplit-dwarf

2012-11-17 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55364 Bug #: 55364 Summary: ICE: in remove_addr_table_entry, at dwarf2out.c:4201 with -O -gsplit-dwarf Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 St

[Bug fortran/55352] Erroneous gfortran warning of unused module variable when variable is only used in namelist

2012-11-17 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55352 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assig

[Bug libstdc++/55363] New: tuple_size is not a class template

2012-11-17 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55363 Bug #: 55363 Summary: tuple_size is not a class template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/55362] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

2012-11-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNC

[Bug fortran/55362] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer

2012-11-17 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55362 Bug #: 55362 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with size() on character pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug rtl-optimization/55315] comparing address to constant is folded in cse

2012-11-17 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55315 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-17 10:32:43 UTC --- Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg01438.html

[Bug bootstrap/54283] [4.8 regression] build tools don't run after cxx-conversion merge

2012-11-17 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54283 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/55243] STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr

2012-11-17 Thread rolf.ebert.gcc at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243 --- Comment #5 from Rolf Ebert 2012-11-17 10:02:49 UTC --- STAMP isn't set by configure. It is rather hardcoded in gcc/Makefile.in Correspondignly it has to be set in gnattools/Makefile.in, too: --- gnattools/Makefile.in~2011-10-13

[Bug debug/54693] VTA guality issues with loops

2012-11-17 Thread andreast at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug target/55316] gcc/libsanitizer/asan/asan_linux.cc:70:3: error: #error "Unsupported arch"

2012-11-17 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55316 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org ---