http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #30 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-11-09 07:31:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> I committed the C-only version of the patch as the issues mentioned in comment
> #27 couldn't be addressed before stage3.
Thanks Tobi!
I
in cycles 11128.1
size 6. v3: time in cycles 10383
gcc version 4.8.0 20121108 (experimental) [trunk revision 19] (GCC)
[vocms123] ~/public/ctest/bugs48 $ c++ -O2 smatrix.ii ; ./a.out
size 5. v1: time in cycles 14040.5
size 5. v2: time in cycles 3264.85
size 5. v3: time in cycles 3457.25
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente
2012-11-09 06:39:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28646
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28646
test case (preprocessed with gcc 4.7.2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
--- Comment #2 from davidxl 2012-11-09 06:05:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The problem actually exists in main line compiler too.
This is another test case.
Segfaults without option, but builds ok with -DOK.
The problem s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55248
Bug #: 55248
Summary: Segmentation Fault - instantiating template with
partial specialization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-09 05:08:29
UTC ---
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 gcc]$ cat /export/gnu/import/delta-2006.08.03/x.c
typedef unsigned int uint32_t;
typedef unsigned int uintptr_t;
typedef uint32_t Elf32_Word;
typedef uint32_t Elf32_Addr;
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-09 02:36:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 28644
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28644
A patch
This patch prints SImode register names to force addr32 prefix
if displacement < -16*10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55247
Bug #: 55247
Summary: [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: Max. number
of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55246
Bug #: 55246
Summary: Define a macro for 16*1024*1024
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-11-09
00:58:20 UTC ---
As I said in PR 43113, it would be wonderful if g++ detected that something is
a recursive template instantiation and it didn't print the whole expansion but
just the first rec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.7.3 |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from davidxl 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #30 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-09 00:35:28
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
>
> I think the most robust solution would be to always zero-extend the addresses
> for -mx32, i.e. output
> movl%ecx, -1073743664(%eax)
> even if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245
Bug #: 55245
Summary: Compiler segfault when compiling the small test case
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55228
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Krügler
2012-11-08 23:52:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Agreed, looks like an invalid issue to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-08
23:50:34 UTC ---
In short, I think we are fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|GCC at DanielRHouck dot com |
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
23:21:44 UTC ---
> So for POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED > 0, we should transform
>
> (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y)))
>
> in such a way that it won't cause ICE and zero-extend t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Houck 2012-11-08
23:19:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 28642
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28642
The original source code before preprocessing
I am including this because the problem lies w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55244
Bug #: 55244
Summary: char_traits compares characters as though
unsigned
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41004
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-08
23:07:36 UTC ---
May be fixed by the patch that was applied for PR54364.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu 2012-11-08 23:02:54
UTC ---
So for POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED > 0, we should transform
(zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y)))
in such a way that it won't cause ICE and zero-extend the
result. For
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18316
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-12 21:46:26 |2012-11-08 21:46:26
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #11 from Steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-08
22:41:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> A reduced testcase for the second case.
> On mainline, i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> /* -march=i686 -mtune=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 */
>
> regis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18046
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2012-03-18 10:29:57 |2012-11-08 10:29:57
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
Tobias Schlüter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
--- Comment #2 from Rolf Ebert 2012-11-08
22:08:16 UTC ---
A complete build instruction is in
http://arduino.ada-language.com/building-avr-gnat-for-avr-ada.html
I'll add a make output without the patch once I can build again (probably
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55191
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2012-11-08
21:47:54 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Thu Nov 8 21:47:50 2012
New Revision: 193341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193341
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/55191
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55243
Bug #: 55243
Summary: STAMP variable is not defined in t-avr
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #47 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 21:19:05 UTC ---
On 11/08/2012 03:25 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 02:56 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> On the other hand, the old-old code for rehash didn't use
>> _M_growth_fac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55242
Bug #: 55242
Summary: continued lines not always merged into one long line
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45882
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #46 from frs.dumont at gmail dot com 2012-11-08 20:21:15 UTC ---
Attached patch applied to trunk and 4.7 branch.
2012-11-08 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/54075
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable<>::rehash): Reset hash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53145
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08
20:20:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:20:10 2012
New Revision: 193340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193340
Log:
PR debug/53145
* dwarf2out.c (g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08
20:16:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > If it is valid, the series of foldings that result into the overflow are
> > first
> > folding sizeof (int) - 1UL int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #45 from François Dumont 2012-11-08
20:16:15 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:16:04 2012
New Revision: 193339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193339
Log:
2012-11-08 François Dumont
PR libstdc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08
20:15:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:15:06 2012
New Revision: 193338
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193338
Log:
PR debug/54499
* cgraphunit.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54789
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08
20:13:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:13:13 2012
New Revision: 193337
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193337
Log:
PR driver/54789
* gcc.c (proces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55137
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2012-11-08
20:10:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If it is valid, the series of foldings that result into the overflow are first
> folding sizeof (int) - 1UL into sizeof (int) + 18446744073709551615U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54308
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08
20:09:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:09:14 2012
New Revision: 193336
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193336
Log:
PR target/54308
* config/rs6000
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54075
--- Comment #44 from François Dumont 2012-11-08
20:06:08 UTC ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Thu Nov 8 20:06:00 2012
New Revision: 193335
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193335
Log:
2012-11-08 François Dumont
PR libstdc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2012-11-08
17:33:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 28637
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28637
Untested patch
This is the fix I am currently bootstrapping and testing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
17:17:35 UTC ---
> No, this would be one giant kludge by itself. The failure just shows that the
> controversial patch [1] for PR 49721 was wrong.
>
> Quote from [1]:
>
> --quote--
> I am
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-11-08
17:10:34 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Thu Nov 8 17:10:26 2012
New Revision: 193332
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193332
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/54850
* s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #35 from Jan Hubicka 2012-11-08
16:46:28 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 8 16:46:18 2012
New Revision: 193331
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193331
Log:
PR middle-end/48636
* ipa-inli
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #26 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-08 16:34:27
UTC ---
> I think the most robust solution would be to always zero-extend the addresses
> for -mx32, i.e. output
> movl%ecx, -1073743664(%eax)
> even if the address is a PLUS in D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #25 from Uros Bizjak 2012-11-08 16:24:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> I think the most robust solution would be to always zero-extend the addresses
> for -mx32, i.e. output
> movl%ecx, -1073743664(%eax)
> even
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55236
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
16:14:23 UTC ---
> I think I have the GCC version checks right there, for the availability of the
> builtins? That is, __builtin_bswap32() and __builtin_bswap64() since GCC 4.4,
> and __builtin_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
16:11:25 UTC ---
> I applied i386 change at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28591
>
> to compile it:
>
> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 tmp]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc/release/usr/gcc-4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51727
--- Comment #28 from Tobias Schlüter 2012-11-08
15:46:13 UTC ---
Author: tobi
Date: Thu Nov 8 15:46:07 2012
New Revision: 193329
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193329
Log:
PR fortran/51727
* module.c (sorted_pointer_info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-08
15:21:40 UTC ---
Paolo's been very busy recently, cleaning up loads of longstanding bugs like
that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-08
15:20:37 UTC ---
Understandable: the kind of work I have been doing lately at times is pretty
weird ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
--- Comment #5 from Joel Yliluoma 2012-11-08 15:16:48
UTC ---
Nice. I had no idea this was first reported in 2003 and fixed in 2012 in a
version recent enough to be still unreleased :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-11-08
15:14:25 UTC ---
Oops, thanks, Paolo!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55241
Bug #: 55241
Summary: [C++11] diagnostics show sizeof...(T) as sizeof(T...)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: dia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54859
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10416
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bisqwit at iki dot fi
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-08
15:04:05 UTC ---
I fixed this in mainline, didn't I?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53787
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240
Bug #: 55240
Summary: [c++0x] ICE on non-static data member initialization
using 'auto' variable from containing function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Versi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #7 from David Woodhouse 2012-11-08
14:29:37 UTC ---
Linux kernel patch to use the builtins at
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch&m=135212414925921&w=2
I think I have the GCC version checks right there, for the availability of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55239
Bug #: 55239
Summary: Spurious "unused variable" warning on function-local
objects with a destructor and an initializer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54881
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-fcatch-undefined-behavior: |-fsanitize=undefined: Turn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55153
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55235
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44786
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-08
12:30:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 28635
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28635
gcc48-pr54499.patch
That change looks very much broken to me, this should hopefully fix it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-11-08 12:27:20 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-11-07
> 18:20:16 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #7)
[...]
> I don't see such a failure in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54519
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin10 |x86_64-*-*
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Bug #: 55238
Summary: ICE in find_aggregate_values_for_callers_subset, at
ipa-cp.c:2908 building zlib
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54499
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
