http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55131
mawenqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55131
mawenqi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Component|inline-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55122
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-10-30
02:46:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Agreed, patch is pre-approved.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Segmentation fault happened |Segmentation fault happened
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54989
--- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-30 02:17:57 UTC ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Oct 30 02:17:50 2012
New Revision: 192976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192976
Log:
PR target/54989
* gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55131
Bug #: 55131
Summary: Segmentation fault happened after upgraded g++ from
3.4.6 to 4.7.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53457
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53378
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
--- Comment #19 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-30 01:59:10 UTC ---
*** Bug 55126 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54957
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rbmj at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28566|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-30 01:36:26
UTC ---
This helps:
diff --git a/gcc/rtlanal.c b/gcc/rtlanal.c
index 43d4cb8..d076ad6 100644
--- a/gcc/rtlanal.c
+++ b/gcc/rtlanal.c
@@ -5460,6 +5460,7 @@ strip_address_mutations (rtx *l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54680
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54602
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-30 01:24:09
UTC ---
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr55116]$ cat x.cc
typedef struct rtx_def *rtx;
enum machine_mode {
VOIDmode };
enum rtx_code {
CONST_INT, NEG, CONST, PLUS, NOT, MINUS };
enum rtx_class {
RTX_CONST_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-10-30 01:14:47 UTC ---
A dup of PR54957 / PR55014.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28349|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54583
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54963
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28551|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126
--- Comment #2 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-30 01:04:08 UTC ---
git bisect reports that commit that introduced the regression is svn: 192488
(or git: 584abc984ad...).
I don't know enough about the codebase to easily tell where gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-30 00:10:55
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 28566 [details]
> A testcase
>
> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 prev-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 -mx32 -S /tmp/x.ii
You need to add -maddress-mode=lon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2012-10-30 00:08:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 28566
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28566
A testcase
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 prev-gcc]$ ./xgcc -B./ -O2 -mx32 -S /tmp/x.ii
/tmp/x.ii: In function ‘rtx_de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54864
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53781
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #9 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-29
23:54:10 UTC ---
Can you please also attach the output of -fdump-ipa-profile-all
which should be eval.c.041i.profile. I have my dump here, it should
be the same as yours.
Are you working on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54012
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55130
Bug #: 55130
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in insn_rhs_dead_pseudo_p, at
lra-constraints.c:3224
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2012-10-29
23:25:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> eval.c: In function 'Ge':
> eval.c:792:1: internal compiler error: in df_compact_blocks, at df-core.c:1570
> 0x6917c1 df_compact_blocks()
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54930
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-29
23:21:42 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 29 23:21:35 2012
New Revision: 192968
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192968
Log:
gcc/c-family:
PR c++/54930
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-29
23:12:12 UTC ---
I think Johannes is right, the virtual base is default-initialized without
needing to look up its name in the scope of D, and the implicitly-defined
default constructor is pub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-10-29
23:09:08 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Oct 29 23:09:03 2012
New Revision: 192967
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192967
Log:
Add a testcase for PR middle-end/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #4 from Nick Krempel 2012-10-29
22:41:48 UTC ---
I think the standard is unclear on this. That defect report has been queried by
experts.
It comes down to something subtle about how the generated default constructor
attempts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Unaligned mem load wrongly |[4.8 Regression] Unaligned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55119
--- Comment #1 from simon at pushface dot org 2012-10-29 21:57:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> where attr->file_length is a long.
And on Mac OS X, sizeof(long) is 8. So there isn't a problem there (but the
comment in adaint.c is s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-29
21:56:25 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 29 21:56:12 2012
New Revision: 192965
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192965
Log:
PR libstdc++/55123
* i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55129
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-29
21:49:31 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Oct 29 21:49:19 2012
New Revision: 192964
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192964
Log:
PR libstdc++/55123
* include/b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55129
--- Comment #1 from Roger Meyer 2012-10-29 21:19:32
UTC ---
before you suggest using the .tar.gz instead:
that one is 100 MB and increases download times and needed storage space
significantly.
.xz is the best of both world, fast extrac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55129
Bug #: 55129
Summary: removal of gcc-core tarballs leads to huge extraction
times
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55128
Bug #: 55128
Summary: auto changes storage from .data to .rodata
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54386
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh*-*-* |sh*-*-* arm*
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #1 from Jonat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-29
20:32:41 UTC ---
I've previously considered removing the address(const_reference) overload when
is_same, but doing so would not help most code (e.g.
std::vector) work with user-defined allocat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53066
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53066
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-10-29
20:17:34 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Mon Oct 29 20:17:23 2012
New Revision: 192963
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192963
Log:
2012-10-29 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127
--- Comment #1 from Philipp A. Hartmann 2012-10-29
20:17:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 28565
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28565
minimal test-case (and workaround)
Without WORKAROUND being defined, GCC 4.8 fails wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55127
Bug #: 55127
Summary: [4.8 regression] Incorrect "dependent scope" error
with partial specialisation of non-type parameter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Vers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55126
Bug #: 55126
Summary: Libstdc++-v3 fails to compile
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-29 19:50:59
UTC ---
The standard doesn't say anything about it, but it would also be possible to
tweak one of the address overloads in allocator so there is no ambiguity when
both types are the same.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38226
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48427
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55125
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:37:31 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:37:25 2012
New Revision: 192962
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192962
Log:
PR debug/54693
* gcc/valtrack.c (de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:36:52 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:36:47 2012
New Revision: 192961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192961
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR debug/54693
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:27:39 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:31 2012
New Revision: 192959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192959
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54551
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:27:39 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:31 2012
New Revision: 192959
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192959
Log:
PR debug/54551
PR debug/54693
* val
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:27:11 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:27:09 2012
New Revision: 192958
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192958
Log:
PR debug/54693
* loop-unroll.c (loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54693
--- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva 2012-10-29
19:26:21 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Mon Oct 29 19:26:16 2012
New Revision: 192957
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192957
Log:
PR debug/54693
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55006
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54805
--- Comment #1 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-10-29 19:22:09 UTC ---
Ping?
Robert Mason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-29 19:20:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#7 which
> was
> closed as NAD saying "This is what was intended" but I'm not sure what
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55125
Bug #: 55125
Summary: declaration of the struct's array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #4 from Yegor Derevenets
2012-10-29 18:35:45 UTC ---
Confirm, the patch works for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-10-29
18:23:58 UTC ---
Actually the fix is trivial, we never need allocator<_Tp> , so can just ensure
we never instantiate allocator<_Tp>, then it doesn't matter if _Tp is const.
--- bits/shared
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55122
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55124
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
Using GCC 4.8.0 20121029 :
$ cat daexpr.c
int a, b;
long c;
void f2(void)
{
unsigned long k = 1;
foo(b ? k = 0 : 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-10-29
17:24:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 28563
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28563
gcc48-pr54402-2.patch
Just for completeness, I'm attaching my earlier attempt to fix the
r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55027
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55027
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2012-10-29 17:17:01
UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Mon Oct 29 17:16:51 2012
New Revision: 192954
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192954
Log:
2012-10-29 Marc Glisse
PR middl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
--- Comment #1 from Yegor Derevenets
2012-10-29 17:09:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 28561
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28561
Preprocessed test.cpp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55123
Bug #: 55123
Summary: [C++11] Construction of shared_ptr from
unique_ptr fails
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54850
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55104
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55116
--- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov 2012-10-29
16:37:08 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Oct 29 16:36:57 2012
New Revision: 192949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192949
Log:
2012-10-29 Vladimir Makarov
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: antoine.balest...@gmail.com
Hello !
I'm using GCC 4.8.0 as of 20121029 (r192944) at -O3 and in 32 bit mode :
$ cat lra.c
int i, a;
unsigned long
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55078
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53544
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55120
--- Comment #1 from Nick Krempel 2012-10-29
16:08:49 UTC ---
Not so clear this is a bug, as the default constructor for D could be generated
in the following form:
struct D : B {
D() : B(), ::V() {}
}
Note the reference to V via t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #5 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-29 16:06:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 28560
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28560
profiling data
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #4 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-29 16:05:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 28559
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28559
pre-processed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #3 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-29 16:04:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 28558
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28558
patch4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55121
--- Comment #2 from christophe.lyon at st dot com 2012-10-29 16:03:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 28557
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28557
patch3
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
