http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26
06:43:41 UTC ---
Yes, mainline is SVN trunk.
There are weekly snapshots on http://gcc.gnu.org/snapshots.html (just
get the newest one, it should be more than new enough for this).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #83 from Joost VandeVondele
2012-09-26 06:42:59 UTC ---
Mikael, any progress on this one (BTW, the PR is not yet assigned)? It would be
great to have LTO work with Fortran in 4.8 (especially with all the inlining
improvements).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-26
06:06:11 UTC ---
Sure, can do. Is mainline a synonym for SVN trunk? Is there somewhere I can
download a ready-made tarball, just to make sure everything is autogen'ed
correctly?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28275|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26
05:49:09 UTC ---
Sorry, I didn't notice this was for 4.7 -- the removal of all
suport for the POWER ISA is only on mainline, and won't be
backported. Could you test mainline instead? All
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36557
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51274
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26
05:18:49 UTC ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Sep 26 05:18:43 2012
New Revision: 191752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191752
Log:
gcc/
PR target/51274
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53087
--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-26
05:18:49 UTC ---
Author: segher
Date: Wed Sep 26 05:18:43 2012
New Revision: 191752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191752
Log:
gcc/
PR target/51274
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54712
Bug #: 54712
Summary: internal compiler error: in
gimple_get_virt_method_for_binfo, at gimple-fold.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54364
--- Comment #4 from xuepeng guo 2012-09-26 03:17:59
UTC ---
Author: xguo
Date: Wed Sep 26 03:17:54 2012
New Revision: 191751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191751
Log:
2012-09-26 Zhenqiang Chen
Bac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54650
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-09-25
23:27:34 UTC ---
Looks fixed. Maybe reporter or fixer would like to close it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
21:56:53 UTC ---
Yeah, the generic code is not buggy, it seems sane to assume AND is
integral/vector integer operation only, but I think i?86 isn't the only backend
that uses AND on vector float
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-25
21:38:32 UTC ---
Okay, I'm bootstrapping an unmodified 4.7.2, using a previously-built 4.7.0 as
CC and the following configuration options:
--prefix=/opt/tg
--disable-dependency-t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #8 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 21:32:39 UTC ---
Author: dehao
Date: Tue Sep 25 21:32:29 2012
New Revision: 191747
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191747
Log:
libcpp:
2012-09-25 Dehao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708
--- Comment #1 from Hubert 2012-09-25 21:25:26 UTC
---
System information:
ubuntu 12.04
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #42 from Larry Baker 2012-09-25 20:39:10
UTC ---
Change log for patches here.
The patches here implement GCC stack limit checking for Freescale ColdFire
processors (bug no. 28896) and fix the issues identified in the existing GCC
so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54711
Bug #: 54711
Summary: Fix --target_board examples on test.html page
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
--- Comment #3 from Dave Abrahams 2012-09-25
19:55:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> As already discussed in another PR, with -fsyntax-only no template
> instantiation occurs. Can be that?
Certainly that explains it.
> In any cas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Dehao Chen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dehao at google dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54671
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2012-09-25 19:23:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I think this is a user bug. If gcc is configured against binutils that
> support
> conversion of ctors into init_array, then it will assume it, obvio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46480
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-25
19:06:34 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Sep 25 19:06:28 2012
New Revision: 191743
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191743
Log:
PR target/54089
* config/sh/con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53850
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2012-09-25
18:47:40 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Sep 25 18:47:35 2012
New Revision: 191742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191742
Log:
PR middle-end/53850
* trans-me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #41 from Larry Baker 2012-09-25 18:43:05
UTC ---
Created attachment 28276
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28276
Build patched GNU GCC 4.8.0 experimental for ColdFire uClinux
Notes to download, patch, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-25
18:37:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 28275
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28275
Patch for OPTIONAL
This patch fixes the segfaults of the test case in attachment 28269. It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-25
18:04:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 28270 [details]
> gcc48-pr54703.patch
Since I wrote the code which breaks this, this looks good. The only question I
have is w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-25
17:25:48 UTC ---
Well, if we are interested in the normal user experience, I guess we should
also time with --disable-checking. Not that I think it will make a big
difference..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
--- Comment #2 from Larry Evans 2012-09-25
17:15:29 UTC ---
The gcc compiler was downloaded from:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.8-20120624/gcc-4.8-20120624.tar.bz2
it was configured with the shell script:
#!/bin/bash
this_d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53067
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508
gellert at dkrz dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gellert at dkrz dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54710
Bug #: 54710
Summary: moderately large tuple, with many gets, ballons
compile time
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
16:19:51 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 25 16:19:43 2012
New Revision: 191716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191716
Log:
PR other/54701
* config/avr/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #14 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:18:05 UTC ---
(gdb) call debug_rtx(insn)
(insn:TI 454 460 607 (set (reg:SI 2 r2 [orig:433 buf+2 ] [433])
(zero_extend:SI (mem/u/c/i:QI (symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x2])
[
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
--- Comment #10 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:16:55 UTC ---
oh, sorry please ignore my comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
Dinar Temirbulatov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dtemirbulatov at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #13 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:14:44 UTC ---
This time it is "arm_zero_extendqisi2_v6" pattern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #12 from Dinar Temirbulatov
2012-09-25 16:12:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 28273
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28273
testcase for gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7
Here is another testcase for gcc-4.6 and gcc-4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54709
Bug #: 54709
Summary: [4.8 Regression] r191713 breaks Firefox build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54641
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
16:02:26 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 25 16:02:20 2012
New Revision: 191714
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191714
Log:
PR target/54641
* config/avr/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54708
Bug #: 54708
Summary: library must be placed after source for gcc to see it
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-25
15:53:24 UTC ---
See PR52964
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54694
--- Comment #2 from Toralf Förster 2012-09-25
15:26:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28271
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28271
cc -E
n22 ~ # gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.3/gcc
CO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54707
Bug #: 54707
Summary: picochip.c:332:985: error:
‘default_stabs_asm_out_constructor’ was not declared
in this scope
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
15:06:25 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 25 15:06:17 2012
New Revision: 191713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191713
Log:
2012-09-25 Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
14:57:58 UTC ---
With the hash function fixed
Index: libcpp/line-map.c
===
--- libcpp/line-map.c (revision 191706)
+++ li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54706
Bug #: 54706
Summary: -fsyntax-only suppresses a compilation error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54526
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-25 14:44:58 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 25 14:44:52 2012
New Revision: 191712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191712
Log:
/cp
2012-09-25 Paolo Carlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
14:41:17 UTC ---
static hashval_t
location_adhoc_data_hash (const void *l)
{
const struct location_adhoc_data *lb =
(const struct location_adhoc_data *) l;
return (hashval_t) lb-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918
utke at mcs dot anl.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||utke at mcs dot anl.gov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-09-25 14:24:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> The testcases are also fixed by
>
> Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
> ===
> --- gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54705
Bug #: 54705
Summary: Building gcc with ADA and LTO results in an internal
error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50981
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54618
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-25
14:19:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 28269
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28269
OPTIOAL: Draft patch + test case
I have attached a patch which fixes some of the issues wit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|bernds at gcc dot gnu.org |
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
14:07:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 28268
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28268
testcase
Testcase. Needs -fpermissive, for example with -O2 -funroll-loops -ffast-math.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54704
Bug #: 54704
Summary: three-fold increase in compile-time between r191483
and r191569
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
13:48:10 UTC ---
Looking into it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz 2012-09-25 13:32:27
UTC ---
Um, sorry. Forgot to note the compiler switches:
gcc -O1 -march=bdver1
I can't reproduce the error with corei7-avx or any other non-AVX target.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54703
Bug #: 54703
Summary: [miscompilation] _mm_sub_pd is incorrectly substituted
with vandnps
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:28:13 UTC ---
The testcases are also fixed by
Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
===
--- gcc/lto-symtab.c(revision 191700)
+++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:23:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 28267
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28267
non-working patch with testcases
Confirmed. Non-working patch (from PR54702) with all t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54645
--- Comment #8 from dehao at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-25 13:19:39 UTC ---
Author: dehao
Date: Tue Sep 25 13:19:33 2012
New Revision: 191706
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191706
Log:
gcc:
2012-09-25 Dehao Che
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54625
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dimhen at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:16:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Created attachment 28266 [details]
> > patch
> >
> > builtins should simply not be in the assembler name hash (that fixes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
13:08:45 UTC ---
Yeah, the tree seems to be broken in various ways :/ And as usual Honza is
lost ...
A first try with my patch restored LTO bootstrap til stage3 for me but failed
in
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54676
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54692
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54676
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
12:46:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 25 12:46:54 2012
New Revision: 191703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191703
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54676
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54692
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-25
12:27:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 25 12:27:47 2012
New Revision: 191702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191702
Log:
PR other/54692
* configure.ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
12:10:52 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Sep 25 12:10:39 2012
New Revision: 191701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191701
Log:
PR other/54701
* config/avr/av
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
12:01:11 UTC ---
the malloc and __builtin_malloc variant now enter symbol merging. Fixing that
doesn't fix the issue, but the following seems "correct" anyway:
Index: gcc/lto-symtab.c
===
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54699
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-25 11:56:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Thanks for tracing this.
The mem store insn
(set (subreg:SF (mem/c:DI (reg/f:SI 14 r14)) 4)
(reg:SF 0 r0))
looks valid. The "movsf_ie" patter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-09-25
11:47:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Fixing it would probably have been as fast as reporting this bug.
> > Confirmed.
>
> So are bugs invalid that are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool 2012-09-25
11:44:42 UTC ---
> I haven't built GCC on the AIX 4.3 (PowerPC 604) system lately, but my scripts
> are set up to do so using
>
> --with-cpu=powerpc --disable-aix64 --disable-powercpu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54701
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-25
11:41:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Fixing it would probably have been as fast as reporting this bug. Confirmed.
So are bugs invalid that are easy to fix for others?
If I fix th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-09-25
11:33:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Does this make sense?
Sounds reasonable.
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: dim...@gmail.com
gcc version 4.8.0 20120925 (experimental) [trunk revision 191688] (GCC)
$ gcc -O2 -flto -m64 -c X.i -o x.o
X.i: In function &#x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53266
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Richard G. 2012-09-25
10:56:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does this still fail?
I haven't built GCC on the AIX 4.3 (PowerPC 604) system lately, but my scripts
are set up to do so using
--with-cp
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
