http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54612
Bug #: 54612
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Many failures in ext/random testsuite
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-18
03:47:39 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Sep 18 03:47:35 2012
New Revision: 191412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191412
Log:
PR c++/54575
* pt.c (instantiate_alias_tem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54584
--- Comment #2 from Larry Baker 2012-09-18 02:44:43 UTC
---
The Sourcery (Mentor Graphics) ColdFire uClinux SDK I use uses binutils-1.21.
I installed binutils-2.22 and the latest uClinux elf2flt (downloaded 20120730).
$ /usr/local/gcc-4.7.1/bin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #32 from Larry Baker 2012-09-18 02:16:32
UTC ---
Created attachment 28208
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28208
Build patched GNU GCC 4.6.3 for ColdFire uClinux
Shell script to download, patch, and build GNU GCC 4
Hello libiberty experts,
I don't see anything saying that sha1_process_block() has a size limit
on its input buffer, and if the length of the buffer is big (e.g.,
2^32 on a 64-bit machine) then this code won't correctly add a 64-bit
number to 64-bit number:
/* First increment the byte count. R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-17
23:29:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 28207
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28207
Arithmetic right shift rework
I have tried to apply the same strategies to the arithmetic right shift
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54591
Uenal Mutlu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |MOVED
--- Comment #4 from Uenal Mutlu 2012
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52483
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
Alexander Kornienko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexfh at google dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #31 from Larry Baker 2012-09-17 21:44:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 28206
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28206
Patches for GCC 4.6.3
Patches to fix stack limit checking for GCC 4.6.3 for FreeScale Coldfire
uClinu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54508
--- Comment #2 from Paul Koning 2012-09-17
21:31:29 UTC ---
I just submitted a proposed fix to the gcc-patches list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54611
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54611
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-17
21:14:55 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Sep 17 21:14:51 2012
New Revision: 191408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191408
Log:
PR bootstrap/54611
* nounwind.c (bac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54611
--- Comment #1 from gerald at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-09-17 20:57:21 UTC ---
Author: gerald
Date: Mon Sep 17 20:57:16 2012
New Revision: 191405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191405
Log:
PR bootstrap/54611
* nounwind.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54611
Bug #: 54611
Summary: [4.8 regression] Bootstrap failure: conflicting typ
es for 'backtrace_simple'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28896
--- Comment #30 from Larry Baker 2012-09-17 19:28:19
UTC ---
Created attachment 28205
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28205
Build patched Sourcery (Mentor Graphics) CodeBench Lite GCC 4.6-2011.09-23 for
ColdFire uClinux
Shell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54608
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29234
--- Comment #6 from poletti.marco at gmail dot com 2012-09-17 17:57:58 UTC ---
Still an issue with GCC 4.7.1.
Clang does not have this issue.
Yet another example:
struct C {
void operator[](C) {
}
};
void f() {
C x;
(C()[x]);
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29234
--- Comment #5 from poletti.marco at gmail dot com 2012-09-17 17:55:54 UTC ---
Still an issue with GCC 4.7.1.
Clang does not have this issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29234
poletti.marco at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||poletti.marco at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54608
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-17
17:53:48 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 17 17:53:37 2012
New Revision: 191403
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191403
Log:
2012-09-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54609
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54609
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-17
17:43:32 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Sep 17 17:43:26 2012
New Revision: 191402
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191402
Log:
PR bootstrap/54609
* unknown.c (unkn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54604
--- Comment #2 from Jordan DeLong 2012-09-17 17:35:34
UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54610
Bug #: 54610
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-22.c
(internal compiler error) on x86 AVX targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
fsf-4.7 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../gcc-4.8-20120917/libbacktrace -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wcast-qual -Werror -I
../../gcc-4.8-20120917/libbacktrace/../include -I ../libgcc -g -MT unknown.lo
-MD -MP -MF .d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54609
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2012-09-17
17:19:35 UTC ---
../gcc-4.8-20120917/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.8
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.8/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java --with
|bootstrap using clang |bootstrap on darwin
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2012-09-17
17:08:41 UTC ---
This bootstrap failure also occurs when FSF gcc 4.7.2 svn is used...
libtool: compile: gcc-fsf-4.7 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../gcc-4.8-20120917/libbacktrace -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-4.8-20120917/libbacktrace -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wcast-qual -Werror -I
../../gcc-4.8-20120917/libbacktrace/../include -I ../libgcc -g -MT unknown.lo
-MD -MP -MF .deps/unknown.Tpo -c ../../gcc-4.8-20120917
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-17
16:41:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 17 16:41:41 2012
New Revision: 191398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191398
Log:
PR c++/53661
* typeck2.c (check_narrowing)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #12 from Harald van Dijk 2012-09-17
16:25:09 UTC ---
Oops, quite right, sorry about that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54598
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-17
16:06:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Sep 17 16:06:03 2012
New Revision: 191395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191395
Log:
PR c++/53661
* typeck2.c (check_narrowing)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54598
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-17
16:03:53 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Sep 17 16:03:44 2012
New Revision: 191394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191394
Log:
PR lto/54598
* tree-streamer-in.c (unpack_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54607
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53661
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-17
15:42:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> 7.2p7 starts as "For an enumeration whose underlying type is
> fixed,", so does not apply.
That's just the first sentence; the rest of p7 does apply.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54575
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54608
Bug #: 54608
Summary: Wrong-code with SCAN and VERIFY
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54607
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-17
15:22:56 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Sep 17 15:22:37 2012
New Revision: 191390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191390
Log:
PR target/54607
* config.gcc (tm_file,avr)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54607
Bug #: 54607
Summary: [avr]: Canadian cross build fails because
gen-avr-mmcu-texi.c is compiled with the wrong
compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54601
--- Comment #4 from Perry Smith 2012-09-17 14:18:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> To be included the patch needs to be against trunk.
I don't mind trying to redo this against trunk but I need some help learning
how to build against the trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54606
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54606
Bug #: 54606
Summary: reference assignment failing/points at previous object
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54285
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54285
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-09-17 12:50:40 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Sep 17 12:50:34 2012
New Revision: 191383
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191383
Log:
2012-09-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54603
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54603
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-09-17
12:30:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Sep 17 12:30:16 2012
New Revision: 191382
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191382
Log:
2012-09-17 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/54
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54598
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54592
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regress
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54563
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-17
09:18:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 17 09:18:35 2012
New Revision: 191378
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191378
Log:
PR tree-optimization/54563
* tree-ssa-math-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589
--- Comment #2 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2012-09-17 09:18:16 UTC ---
FWIW, in my original code, func() is a part of a loop body (it keeps reading
values from src in a loop). It doesn't really change anything in the generated
code, though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54564
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-09-17
09:16:47 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Sep 17 09:16:39 2012
New Revision: 191377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191377
Log:
PR target/54564
ChangeLog entry fixup
Modi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54604
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54582
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54589
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54592
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54595
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54605
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-09-17
07:59:34 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Sep 17 07:59:29 2012
New Revision: 191376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191376
Log:
PR target/54222
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_ou
64 matches
Mail list logo
