http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
--- Comment #8 from Nikolka 2012-09-10 06:26:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > g++ v4.7.2 20120908 (prerelease) compiles the original example successfully,
> > but it fails to compile the following code:
>
> G++ i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #15 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-10
05:08:51 UTC ---
In 4.7-branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-10
05:08:15 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Sep 10 05:08:07 2012
New Revision: 191125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191125
Log:
2012-09-09 Thiago Macieira
PR libstdc++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54172
--- Comment #14 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-09-10
05:08:15 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Sep 10 05:08:07 2012
New Revision: 191125
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191125
Log:
2012-09-09 Thiago Macieira
PR libstdc++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51432
Michael Hope changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope at linaro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-10
02:09:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> g++ v4.7.2 20120908 (prerelease) compiles the original example successfully,
> but it fails to compile the following code:
G++ is following the proposed res
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54539
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54539
Bug #: 54539
Summary: pdf docs on web site are bzipped: unusable on Apple
Ipad
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
23:08:54 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Sep 9 23:08:48 2012
New Revision: 191121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191121
Log:
2012-09-10 Sebastian Huber
Jonathan Wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
--- Comment #5 from Nikolka 2012-09-09 22:42:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
These examples aren't similar. An implicitly defined move constructor performs
direct-initialization of non-static data members with the corresponding members
of the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
21:36:40 UTC ---
The example can be simplified to
struct A
{
A() {}
A(A &&) = delete;
A &operator =(A &&) = delete;
};
struct B
{
A a;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54506
--- Comment #3 from Nikolka 2012-09-09 20:55:38 UTC ---
g++ v4.7.2 20120908 (prerelease) compiles the original example successfully,
but it fails to compile the following code:
template
struct A
{
A() {}
A(A cons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #63 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
20:45:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> AFAICT nobody has been asking to cross post to libstdc++.
Also see comment 40, before the first patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #62 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
19:46:45 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Sep 9 19:46:41 2012
New Revision: 191119
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191119
Log:
PR bootstrap/54419
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54538
Bug #: 54538
Summary: Getting assembler messages when compiling
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
18:40:50 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Sep 9 18:40:46 2012
New Revision: 191117
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191117
Log:
PR libstdc++/54388
* include/std/array (a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #61 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-09 18:17:09 UTC ---
> patch committed
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
18:18:32 UTC ---
No, it should be consistent with how it's handled everywhere else.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
--- Comment #6 from rbmj at verizon dot net 2012-09-09 18:08:11 UTC ---
Making local changes to bring stdint.h into compliance works for me as well.
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Maybe it would be nice to use #error in he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
17:56:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Can the compiler warn about the original (buggy) code?
It already does:
c.cc: In function ‘A& get(int)’:
c.cc:3:43: error: invalid initialization of no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
17:56:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Can the compiler warn about the original (buggy) code?
It already does:
c.cc: In function ‘A& get(int)’:
c.cc:3:43: error: invalid initialization of no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54537
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54537
Bug #: 54537
Summary: undiagnosed using-declaration conflicting with used
function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #59 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
17:20:47 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Sun Sep 9 17:20:42 2012
New Revision: 19
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=19
Log:
2012-09-09 Ulrich Drepper
Dominique d'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
17:19:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Maybe it would be nice to use #error in header file to inform the user that
> this feature is not supported for target system (nicer than to get linker
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54021
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-09-09
16:48:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> // This causes "error: the value of 'x' is not usable in a constant
> expression"
> constexpr bool c = __builtin_constant_p(x);
> }
This is also fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
--- Comment #4 from Andris Pavenis 2012-09-09
16:47:44 UTC ---
My test was done with DJGPP development version (2.04) only. It has stdint.h,
but it was recognized by configure as unusable due to bug unrelated to GCC
itself. After fixing this prob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #58 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
16:21:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #56)
> I suppose that the lack of responsiveness may be ultimately due to the fact
> that the issue only shows up on some specific systems (that is, those using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #57 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-09-09
16:18:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #55)
> (1) A new patch has been posted at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00466.html to fix a typo in my
> email address.
But not to a list I ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #56 from Paolo Carlini 2012-09-09
16:14:41 UTC ---
I suppose that the lack of responsiveness may be ultimately due to the fact
that the issue only shows up on some specific systems (that is, those using old
assemblers) which normally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54522
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-09-09
15:27:29 UTC ---
The test case with -O -fno-automatic compiles on powerpc-apple-darwin9 with gcc
3.4.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54419
--- Comment #55 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-09-09 15:21:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comments #53 and #54)
> Please post the patch to the right list and I'll approve it, all libstdc++
> patches need to go to the libstdc++ list.
>
> I've tested the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54536
Bug #: 54536
Summary: [avr]: incorrect crt with -mmcu=at90usb1287
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54522
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54535
Bug #: 54535
Summary: gcc fails to warn when functions are inlined
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39618
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54532
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54451
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drepper.fsp at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54530
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|aaw at googl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29845
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54505
--- Comment #4 from Avi Kivity 2012-09-09 11:12:53 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't think this transformation would always be an improvement.
gcc should make the transformation when it improves the code (like all other
transformations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54531
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2012-09-09 09:30:57
UTC ---
As a side note, is there a reason to prefer vpermpd to vpermilpd when both are
available (apart from the fact that they are written in that order in the .md
file)? I would expect that by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39618
kettenis at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kettenis at gnu dot org
--- Comm
PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.6.4 20120909 (prerelease)
PASS: gcc (GCC) 4.8.0 20120909 (experimental)
<1><2d>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_variable)
<2e> DW_AT_name: i
<30> DW_AT_decl_file : 1
<31> DW_AT_decl_line : 1
<32> DW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54527
vurentjie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54527
vurentjie changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54533
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-09
07:17:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Looks like powerpc has the same issue:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00161.html
Which has a patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54533
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-09
07:12:07 UTC ---
Looks like powerpc has the same issue:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2009-01/msg00161.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54533
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-09
07:01:52 UTC ---
I have seen a bug about this before but I cannot find it. It only happen on
x86_64 as al tells the function if it uses floating point arguments or not.
It might be a bug in gdb in fi
56 matches
Mail list logo
