[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-28 05:37:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > With gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90: > by 0x5F0D3C: gfc_copy_formal_args(gfc_symbol*, gfc_symbol*, ifsrc) That issue is now fixed by comment 7 - the ot

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-28 05:35:22 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Aug 28 05:35:15 2012 New Revision: 190738 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190738 Log: 2012-08-28 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug libstdc++/54388] New: std::array.at() const results in undefined behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54388 Bug #: 54388 Summary: std::array.at() const results in undefined behaviour Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug target/49743] -g enables var_tracking on -O0 - causes long compilations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49743 --- Comment #3 from Gary Funck 2012-08-28 02:20:38 UTC --- Recently, I've been reviewing changes that we made on the GUPC branch (see comment #2) that are candidates for the trunk revision (or in this case, possibly the 4.7 branch). Index: gcc/c

[Bug tree-optimization/53395] [4.8 Regression] The LAPACK functions i(d|s)amax are more than two times slower after revision 187183

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53395 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-08-28 01:18:17 UTC --- Created attachment 28091 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28091 New patch based on Richard's comments Testing a new fix which includes Richard's comments.

[Bug tree-optimization/54132] [4.8 Regression] Incorrect loop transformation with -ftree-loop-distribute-patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54132 --- Comment #2 from Mans Rullgard 2012-08-28 00:10:48 UTC --- I came upon another couple of cases where I believe this bug is causing wrong code. Let me know if you need more tests, and I'll reduce them.

[Bug fortran/54387] Proc-pointer: Wronlgy accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a pointer assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54387 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/54375] FAIL: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_14.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54375 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/54387] New: Proc-pointer: Wronlgy accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a pointer assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54387 Bug #: 54387 Summary: Proc-pointer: Wronlgy accepts non-proc result variable on the RHS of a pointer assignment Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug target/46254] ICE: in find_reloads, at reload.c:3806 (unable to generate reloads) with -fPIC -mcmodel={medium|large} and __sync_val_compare_and_swap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46254 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46254] ICE: in find_reloads, at reload.c:3806 (unable to generate reloads) with -fPIC -mcmodel={medium|large} and __sync_val_compare_and_swap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46254 --- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-08-27 21:13:13 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Aug 27 21:13:07 2012 New Revision: 190732 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190732 Log: PR target/46254 * config/i386/predic

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 20:54:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Others still not tested, but doduc.f90 fails with: This one (and hence all of doduc.f90) - and some of the failures in aermod.f90 are fixed with comment 5.

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 20:51:57 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Aug 27 20:51:52 2012 New Revision: 190731 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190731 Log: 2012-08-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug libstdc++/54376] incorrect complaint about redefinition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54376 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-27 20:40:39 UTC --- Thanks. I will make sure to apply the library changes to the branch too.

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/54386] New: Unaligned mem load wrongly generated for inlined inline/static function

t=sh-elf --prefix=/usr/local --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-multilib --disable-libssp --disable-nls --disable-werror --enable-lto --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib Thread model: single gcc version 4.8.0 20120827 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 18:52:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > With Polyhedron 2005's nf.f90: > With Polyhedron 2005's capacita.f90: Those are fixed by comment 3 > With Polyhedron 2005's capacita.f90 (and some more):

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 18:48:03 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Aug 27 18:47:57 2012 New Revision: 190728 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190728 Log: 2012-08-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug libstdc++/54376] incorrect complaint about redefinition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54376 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug target/54385] [4.8 regression] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:873

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385 --- Comment #2 from Steven Bosscher 2012-08-27 17:54:51 UTC --- Created attachment 28090 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28090 Try to delete unreachable blocks if any edges were removed

[Bug libstdc++/43852] Embedded systems friendly libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43852 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-08-27 17:18:34 UTC --- I finally got time to work on this and have posted an updated patch to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg01879.html I went with your original idea of disabling the "verb

[Bug target/54385] [4.8 regression] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:873

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC|steven at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #1 from Steven Bosscher 2

[Bug target/54385] [4.8 regression] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:873

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/54385] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:873

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54385 Bug #: 54385 Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in pre_and_rev_post_order_compute, at cfganal.c:873 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONF

[Bug preprocessor/53469] #pragma GCC diagnostic works, but using _Pragma doesn't for -Wunused-local-typedefs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug preprocessor/53469] #pragma GCC diagnostic works, but using _Pragma doesn't for -Wunused-local-typedefs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53469 --- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-08-27 15:41:44 UTC --- Author: dodji Date: Mon Aug 27 15:41:38 2012 New Revision: 190714 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190714 Log: PR preprocessor/53469 - argument tokens of _Pragma

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/54384] gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 14:42:54 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Aug 27 14:42:50 2012 New Revision: 190713 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190713 Log: 2012-08-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug fortran/41093] memory leaks with gfc_namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41093 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/41093] memory leaks with gfc_namespace

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41093 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 12:07:52 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Aug 27 12:07:43 2012 New Revision: 190710 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190710 Log: 2012-08-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/41

[Bug fortran/54370] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54370 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-08-27 12:03:45 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Mon Aug 27 12:03:41 2012 New Revision: 190709 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190709 Log: 2012-08-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/54

[Bug fortran/54384] New: gfortran memory leaks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54384 Bug #: 54384 Summary: gfortran memory leaks Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug libstdc++/54296] using the object in the map to erase element from the map crashes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54296 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-08-27 09:36:08 UTC --- Ah, very well, thanks Francois.

[Bug tree-optimization/54077] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark FP EMULATION 44% slower than with clang

2012-08-27 08:42:38 UTC --- 4.8 has improved 20120813 FP EMULATION: 229.84 : 110.29 : 25.45 20120827 FP EMULATION: 281.4 : 135.03 : 31.16

[Bug c++/54383] New: Internal compiler error for lamba function using this-> with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383 Bug #: 54383 Summary: Internal compiler error for lamba function using this-> with -std=c++0x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug bootstrap/54329] gcc/reginfo.o differs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329 wbrana changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/54296] using the object in the map to erase element from the map crashes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54296 --- Comment #7 from François Dumont 2012-08-27 07:58:49 UTC --- I confirm that it is an old issue, it has surely always be there. I managed to reproduce it from the testsuite. The problem is that the current code works fine when the key instance

[Bug rtl-optimization/54365] ARM optimization bug when pointer arithmetic wraps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54365 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com --- Comment #4