http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53922
Bug #: 53922
Summary: VRP: semantic conflict between range_includes_zero_p
and value_inside_range
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
--- Comment #15 from xuepeng guo 2012-07-11 06:02:17
UTC ---
Author: xguo
Date: Wed Jul 11 06:02:10 2012
New Revision: 189421
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189421
Log:
2012-07-11 Terry Guo
Backport r181685 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53921
Bug #: 53921
Summary: [C++0x] ICE on lambda inside method of class template
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
zhuolin liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-07-10
22:50:24 UTC ---
On x86_64-linux the SEGV went away on trunk with r186159:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-04/msg00108.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00202.html
The patch des
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53886
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-10 22:07:36
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jul 10 22:07:29 2012
New Revision: 189417
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189417
Log:
PR target/53886
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr53
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53911
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-07-10 22:01:53
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jul 10 22:01:44 2012
New Revision: 189416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189416
Log:
PR target/53911
* config/sh/sh.md: Remove di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-07-10
19:55:25 UTC ---
My mistake, I can now reproduce the runtime SEGV on x86_64-linux with vanilla
gcc-4.7-20120707.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920
--- Comment #1 from Samuel Bronson 2012-07-10
19:07:26 UTC ---
Oh, I suppose I should mention that I ran into this because I was using ccache
to compile Emacs with --enable-gcc-warnings, and by default ccache runs the
preprocessor and the compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #5 from Erik Schnetter 2012-07-10
19:05:01 UTC ---
Yes, the isl changes are part of what I mean. Since the version-specific
install instructions are already there, they may as well be available on the
web, and/or the web could warn ab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-10
18:45:54 UTC ---
... and I was using gmp 5.0.1 with gcc 4.6 over a year ago:
http://advogato.org/person/redi/diary/240.html
If it doesn't work with 4.7 you did something wrong, it's not a problem wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-10
18:36:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> between manuals for different versions, and doesn't even seem to offer an
> online manual for the trunk.
Yes it does, at the bottom of the page:
http://gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #2 from Erik Schnetter 2012-07-10
18:26:53 UTC ---
I am currently installing gcc 4.7.1, and and dealing with the prerequisites.
gmp 5.x was not recognised as valid version; I had to install gmp 4.x instead.
Finding a valid combination
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50387
Samuel Bronson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||naesten at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53811
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53853
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-10 17:53:56 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 10 17:53:48 2012
New Revision: 189412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189412
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-07-03 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53811
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-10 17:53:53 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 10 17:53:48 2012
New Revision: 189412
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189412
Log:
Backport from mainline
2012-07-03 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53920
Bug #: 53920
Summary: "gcc -E" does not honor #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored
"-Wunused-macro"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-07-10
17:41:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The online install instructions should prominently mention that they are not
> valid for any released version
They generally are valid.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53919
Bug #: 53919
Summary: Version-specific install instructions not available
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
--- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2012-07-10
17:03:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I can't reproduce on x86_64-linux,
Odd. What does valgrind say / did you check the generated code?
> HP: are you sure it fails on x86_64?
Yes, as w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53917
--- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-07-10
16:38:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 27772
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27772
Another testcase (inlining issue)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53918
Bug #: 53918
Summary: Incorrect version for cloog-ppl listed in
prerequisites.html
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53917
--- Comment #1 from Paulo J. Matos 2012-07-10
16:37:20 UTC ---
Here's another example:
void fn1 ();
typedef struct
{
int hdr[0];
} foo;
typedef enum
{
READ_WRITE
} bar;
typedef struct
{
struct
{
foo t1;
} mp;
} foobar;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53917
Bug #: 53917
Summary: Warning message line about variable points to place
where variable doesn't occur
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53916
Bug #: 53916
Summary: [mips16] divide operation compiled result incorrect
with GCC-4.6.3 '-O2' option
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53831
--- Comment #23 from Yuri Gribov 2012-07-10
15:34:02 UTC ---
The C++ Standard says that "an inline function shall be defined in every
translation unit in which it is used" (n1905, 7.1.2). The test in question
violates this rule: definition for C:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcov -f rounding problem|gcov can call format_gcov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915
--- Comment #2 from Vincent Lefèvre 2012-07-10
14:46:28 UTC ---
Actually this should not be the problem, because if top = bottom = 9, then the
division is done exactly anyway; moreover "percent = limit - 1;" won't be
executed in this case due to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915
--- Comment #1 from Vincent Lefèvre 2012-07-10
14:27:28 UTC ---
The problem is probably in gcc/gcov.c, function format_gcov, which has:
float ratio = bottom ? (float)top / bottom : 0;
int ix;
unsigned limit = 100;
unsigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53914
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53914
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-linux
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53915
Bug #: 53915
Summary: gcov -f rounding problem
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43703
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53914
Bug #: 53914
Summary: poor code generated for offset addressing on ppc32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53531
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53531
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-07-10
12:58:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Jason, any idea which patch fixed these cases and if we need anything in the
> testsuite to prevent regressions before closing it?
Nothing springs to mind.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47088
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53859
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47091
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-netbsd, arm-pe, |arm-netbsd
|arm-winc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47066
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53547
--- Comment #3 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-10 12:00:21 UTC ---
+cc: Jan Hubicka
The use case here represents what happened as we were deploying for Chrome (the
browser). Chrome is a moving source base and they did not want to integrate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53913
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53913
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2012-07-10
11:48:07 UTC ---
Author: schwab
Date: Tue Jul 10 11:48:00 2012
New Revision: 189410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189410
Log:
PR bootstrap/53913
* config/m68k/m68k.c (m68k_epi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53546
--- Comment #2 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-07-10 11:43:31 UTC ---
-fripa is the IPA optimizer in the google/* branches of gcc. It does
lightweight IPO based on PGO/FDO.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53900
--- Comment #4 from Gael Guennebaud
2012-07-10 11:09:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 27770
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27770
Another demonstration of the issue using std::vector
Note that when we declare:
__attribute__((al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53531
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507
--- Comment #14 from owner at bugs dot debian.org 2012-07-10 10:54:26 UTC ---
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been recei
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53531
Niels Penneman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niels at penneman dot org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3507
Daniel Santos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.santos at pobox dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-07-10
10:11:15 UTC ---
I can't reproduce on x86_64-linux, nor with a cross to sparc64-linux (only
natively on sparc64-linux so far).
HP: are you sure it fails on x86_64?
I'll try to bisect natively on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53907
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-07-10
09:16:29 UTC ---
s.0_2 = (sizetype) s_1(D);
D.4303_3 = s.0_2 & 15;
D.4304_4 = -D.4303_3;
s_5 = s_1(D) + D.4304_4;
sz_6 = MEM[(const __m128i * {ref-all})s_5];
return sz_6;
it's hard to s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16314
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53913
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53907
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53908
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38692
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53882
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16132
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53283
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53659
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
--- Comment #1 from Richard Earnsh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53913
Bug #: 53913
Summary: [4.8 regression] resource.c:1179:5: error:
'current_function_decl' undeclared broke m68k
bootstrap
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53854
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53912
Bug #: 53912
Summary: bootstrap fails at stage 2 with error: cast from
'void*' to 'long int' loses precision in ggc-common.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
--- Comment #4 from Tim Ruehsen 2012-07-10 07:58:26
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have thought a lot how to attract more and new developers to GCC who will be
> willing to develop things that are not a priority for current developers, but
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53911
Bug #: 53911
Summary: [SH] Improve displacement addressing
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53549
--- Comment #10 from Conrad 2012-07-10
07:22:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 27769
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27769
arma323.ii.gz
Retested with gcc 4.7.1 and Armadillo 3.2.3 (latest upstream version).
This time a related
75 matches
Mail list logo
