[Bug target/53512] SH Target: Allow fsca and fsrra for non-SH4A

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 --- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-05-29 02:39:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) Sounds good.

[Bug c++/16166] -Weffc++ finer granularity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16166 --- Comment #4 from David Stone 2012-05-29 02:13:53 UTC --- I would recommend against naming each warning -Weffc++[n], but rather, give a more descriptive name. My suggestion is to create a few warnings, so that -Weffc++ would map to the followin

[Bug c++/53514] New: Make -Wpadded a meta-option for -Wpadded-in-middle and -Wpadded-at-end

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53514 Bug #: 53514 Summary: Make -Wpadded a meta-option for -Wpadded-in-middle and -Wpadded-at-end Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIR

[Bug target/53513] New: SH Target: Add support for fschg and fpchg insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513 Bug #: 53513 Summary: SH Target: Add support for fschg and fpchg insns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug fortran/53509] exp and log function give unexpected results when called with numbers as arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53509 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/53512] New: SH Target: Allow fsca and fsrra for non-SH4A

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53512 Bug #: 53512 Summary: SH Target: Allow fsca and fsrra for non-SH4A Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug inline-asm/52813] %rsp in clobber list is silently ignored

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52813 Ralph Corderoy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ralph-gccbugzilla at |

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #19 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-28 22:31:40 UTC --- Excellent. Thanks, Jakub.

[Bug target/51340] SH Target: Make -mfused-madd enabled by default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51340 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug target/53511] New: SH Target: Add support for fma patterns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53511 Bug #: 53511 Summary: SH Target: Add support for fma patterns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c++/50134] -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 f

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 --- Comment #13 from mako 2012-05-28 21:04:25 UTC --- Am I interpreting correctly that double braces are /required/ for std::array init lists but only when the subtype has has a multivariable initializer too? ..

[Bug target/53268] [4.8 Regression] [SH] libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53268 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/53509] exp and log function give unexpected results when called with numbers as arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53509 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at bromo dot

[Bug c++/25137] Warning "missing braces around initializer" causing problems with tr1::array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/25137] Warning "missing braces around initializer" causing problems with tr1::array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25137 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/25137] Warning "missing braces around initializer" causing problems with tr1::array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25137 --- Comment #19 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-28 17:42:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 28 17:42:29 2012 New Revision: 187937 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187937 Log: /c-family 2012-05-28 Paolo Carlini

[Bug middle-end/53510] [4.8 Regression] OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug middle-end/53510] [4.8 Regression] OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-28 17:29:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Stupid guess: does it happen with -fno-diagnostics-show-caret too? It does not happen with -fno-diagnostics-show-caret .

[Bug middle-end/53510] [4.8 Regression] OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-28 17:28:51 UTC --- Stupid guess: does it happen with -fno-diagnostics-show-caret too?

[Bug middle-end/53510] [4.8 Regression] OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, memory-hog Component

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-28 17:16:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Andrew, please try to provide details about these memory issues, because first > blush I didn't notice anything special memory-wise. Maybe open a separate P

[Bug c++/53510] OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-28 17:16:03 UTC --- Created attachment 27514 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27514 Testcase

[Bug c++/53510] New: OOM while compile some code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53510 Bug #: 53510 Summary: OOM while compile some code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-28 17:09:21 UTC --- Andrew, please try to provide details about these memory issues, because first blush I didn't notice anything special memory-wise. Maybe open a separate PR.

[Bug c++/53500] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-28 16:53:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Though with -ftime-report I get an internal error: > /usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/alloc_traits.h:48:11: internal compiler error: in > timevar_start, at timevar.

[Bug fortran/53509] New: exp and log function give unexpected results when called with numbers as arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53509 Bug #: 53509 Summary: exp and log function give unexpected results when called with numbers as arguments Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Stat

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-28 16:32:23 UTC --- With checking disabled the error message comes out fine, thus the issue isn't really urgent.

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-28 16:25:12 UTC --- The code: array a { { "smile", 1 } }; Attempts to initialize array with { { "smile", 1 } } which attempts to initialize pair[2] with { "smile", 1 } which fairly obviously atte

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-28 16:21:24 UTC --- 4.6 gets the error right, what you're doing is equivalent to: struct pair { pair(const char*, int) { } }; struct array { pair data[1]; }; array a { { "smile", 1 } }; And that

[Bug c++/53405] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Enum-dependent class template instantiations not recognized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53405 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53494] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53494 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-28 16:11:29 UTC --- "correctly rejects it" in general means "per the ISO C++ Standard, which we are implementing, the testcase is invalid with diagnostics required, thus the compiler is right in rejecting

[Bug c++/53500] internal compiler error in joust()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53500 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-28 15:59:54 UTC --- Mainline is fine.

[Bug rtl-optimization/53508] New: function.c:stack_protect_epilogue call to predict_insn_def with wrong direction of prediction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53508 Bug #: 53508 Summary: function.c:stack_protect_epilogue call to predict_insn_def with wrong direction of prediction Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c/53502] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug c++/53398] feature request: option for overloaded methods order in vtable compatibility with msc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398 --- Comment #5 from Roman Wieczorek 2012-05-28 15:50:30 UTC --- As it goes for Leaf classes (IA64 C++ ABI - Category 1: Leaf), vtables are binary defined in com document (only virtual functions, no constructor, no destructor, no overloades). And

[Bug preprocessor/53463] [4.8 Regression]: system header not recognized, yielding warnings about long long preprocessor constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53463 --- Comment #5 from Greta Yorsh 2012-05-28 15:28:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > It seems to me that this issue is dealt with by the patch I have proposed at > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg01389.html. The discussion on > th

[Bug c/53502] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/53476] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53476 Greta Yorsh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c/53502] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-05-28 14:48:07 UTC --- Any idea why this does not happen without --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx?

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-28 14:34:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > > Anyway, would it be possible to have a testcase for the gcc testsuite too? > > I've been trying, but so far haven't been able to come up with anything o

[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-28 14:28:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 28 14:28:42 2012 New Revision: 187932 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187932 Log: PR tree-optimization/53505 * c-c++-common/t

[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-28 14:28:06 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon May 28 14:28:00 2012 New Revision: 187931 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187931 Log: PR tree-optimization/53505 * c-c++-common/t

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rockeet at gmail dot com --- Comment #17

[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 William J. Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/53438] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with full-byte store

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438 --- Comment #15 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-28 13:58:30 UTC --- Author: wschmidt Date: Mon May 28 13:58:18 2012 New Revision: 187930 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187930 Log: 2012-05-28 Bill Schmidt Backport f

[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-28 13:39:12 UTC --- That revision added: + /* But leave bitfield accesses alone. */ + && (root->offset % BITS_PER_UNIT) == 0) Here root->offset % BITS_PER_UNIT is 0, still it is a bitfield and

[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-28 13:25:34 UTC --- SRA creates: a$6; ... a$6_21 = MEM[(const struct A &)D.9923_20 + 6]; D.10122_23 = (int) a$6_21; which expansion doesn't handle as extract_bit_field (both MEM_REF and TARGET_MEM_

[Bug c++/53505] [4.7/4.8 Regression] bitfield with bool type generated broken object file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 --- Comment #5 from Ling Li 2012-05-28 12:37:44 UTC --- Thanks much for the super quick fix.

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-28 12:11:15 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 28 12:11:04 2012 New Revision: 187929 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187929 Log: gcc/cp 2012-05-28 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-28 12:09:10 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon May 28 12:09:01 2012 New Revision: 187928 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187928 Log: gcc/cp 2012-05-28 Paolo Carlini

[Bug c++/53475] [4.8 Regression] Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot | |com

[Bug c++/53475] [4.8 Regression] Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475 Greta Yorsh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/53475] [4.8 Regression] Section type conflict errors in libstdc++ testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475 --- Comment #3 from Greta Yorsh 2012-05-28 11:17:00 UTC --- Created attachment 27512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27512 preprocessed source

[Bug c++/53503] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] unexpected AST of kind ltgt_expr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53503 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/53507] New: ia32/amd64: bsf can be used to test null memory, bsf sets zero flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53507 Bug #: 53507 Summary: ia32/amd64: bsf can be used to test null memory, bsf sets zero flag Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/53490] Segmentation Fault when accessing std::set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53490 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/53506] Variadic templates in combination with function pointer problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53506 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-28 09:31:33 UTC --- 4.6 only rejects the first one: t.cc: In function 'int main()': t.cc:17:18: error: no matching function for call to 'A::a(int (&)(int, int), int)' t.cc:17:18: note: candidate is: t.

[Bug c++/53490] Segmentation Fault when accessing std::set

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53490 --- Comment #8 from Jamie Allsop 2012-05-28 09:09:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > It was a vanilla bjam build of boost 1.49, so > > > no -std=c++11. > > > > Then technically that'

[Bug c++/53506] New: Variadic templates in combination with function pointer problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53506 Bug #: 53506 Summary: Variadic templates in combination with function pointer problem Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/53321] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53321 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug c/53502] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap broken with --disable-build-poststage1-with-cxx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53502 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/53505] New: bitfield with bool type generated broken object code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53505 Bug #: 53505 Summary: bitfield with bool type generated broken object code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical