http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53279
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53394
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-22
05:34:11 UTC ---
I see what happens. I think SRA is taking the right hand side's type rather
than look at the left hand side where it is a bitfield.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.2
Summary|[4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-22
05:23:06 UTC ---
I think this is just a dup of bug 52072.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-22
05:18:17 UTC ---
Comeau online also accepts it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
--- Comment #3 from Bryce Lelbach (wash)
2012-05-22 05:17:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 27473
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27473
Results of compiling the test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
--- Comment #2 from Bryce Lelbach (wash)
2012-05-22 05:15:36 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 27472
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27472
Results of compiling the test case
$ g++-4.5 --version
g++-4.5 (Debian 4.5.3-12) 4.5.3
Cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
--- Comment #1 from Bryce Lelbach (wash)
2012-05-22 05:14:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 27472
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27472
Results of compiling the test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53446
Bug #: 53446
Summary: Template function incorrectly rejected when
convertible argument is provided for a parameter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53183
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53322
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-05-22
03:50:36 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue May 22 03:50:26 2012
New Revision: 187757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187757
Log:
PR c++/53322 - -Wunused-local-typedefs is not enab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53444
Bug #: 53444
Summary: Accommodate non-compliant strerror_r() on VxWorks.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53445
Bug #: 53445
Summary: No sticky bit on VxWorks - fix chmod.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53264
rbmj at verizon dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #27333|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53443
Bug #: 53443
Summary: Bad Macro Definition SUBSUBTARGET_OVERRIDE_OPTIONS in
vxworks.h
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-21
23:21:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 27466
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27466
Pass around the location of the format string
First, admittedly rather lame, attempt at some impro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-21 22:18:05 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 21 22:17:54 2012
New Revision: 187746
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187746
Log:
2012-05-21 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-21
22:32:38 UTC ---
Have you compared the linker command lines (using gcc -v)?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2012-05-21
23:15:31 UTC ---
What does clang report for this:
#include
void f() {
printf(
"%."
"*d");
}
?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-21
21:50:33 UTC ---
Ah, I figured out what misled me: I added curly brackets to avoid
-Wmissing-braces warnings, ie, function({{0, 0, 0}}), and like this not only
the snippet doesn't trigger warnings, is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53373
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-05-21
21:37:05 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon May 21 21:37:01 2012
New Revision: 187745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187745
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/53373
* caller-save.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361
--- Comment #3 from Bastien ROUCARIES
2012-05-21 21:19:35 UTC ---
bastien@bastien-debian:/tmp$ cat test.c
#include
void function(std::array a)
{
}
int main()
{
// ok
std::array vec {0, 0, 0};
// error: could not convert '{"hello", "world"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
21:06:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 21:06:13 2012
New Revision: 187742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187742
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53436
* omp-low.c (omp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48361
--- Comment #2 from Ben Webb 2012-05-21 21:05:49 UTC
---
Created attachment 27465
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27465
inputs.tar.gz
I'm seeing very similar behavior running gcov on the attached files
(inputs.tar.gz contains
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
21:05:39 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 21:05:33 2012
New Revision: 187741
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187741
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53436
* omp-low.c (omp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-21
21:05:08 UTC ---
The last time I looked at a bug from clang/llvm, the issue was it was using a
temporary variable pasted the scope.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53409
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
21:02:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 21:02:40 2012
New Revision: 187739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187739
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53409
* tree-vect-loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
21:03:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 21:03:42 2012
New Revision: 187740
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187740
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53366
* tree-vect-slp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53161
Roman Kononov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roman at binarylife dot net
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
21:00:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 21:00:43 2012
New Revision: 187738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187738
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53410
* fold-const.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700
--- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora 2012-05-21 19:13:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Fixed on trunk and branch
what about other target libs? (gfortran,quadmath,ssp)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53384
--- Comment #5 from John T 2012-05-21 19:55:36 UTC
---
This problem I found with 4.6.3 somewhat disappeared after I first used v.
4.4.1 to make gcc-4.6.1 and install. Version 4.6.3 built ok starting with
4.6.1, so I would assume that the problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53183
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-21
19:02:28 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon May 21 19:02:11 2012
New Revision: 187733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187733
Log:
2012-05-21 Andrew Pinski
PR bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53441
Bug #: 53441
Summary: [4.8 Regression] obj-c++.dg/ivar-invalid-type-1.mm ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-checking
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|jsm28 at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53441
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-05-21 20:43:40
UTC ---
Following patch fixes the ICE:
--cut here--
Index: cp/decl.c
===
--- cp/decl.c (revision 187736)
+++ cp/decl.c (worki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-05-21
20:12:17 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon May 21 20:12:05 2012
New Revision: 187736
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187736
Log:
PR c/53418
* c-typeck.c (build_conditiona
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-21
18:55:04 UTC ---
Someone needs to implement the thunk functionality for arm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442
--- Comment #1 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-05-21 19:52:57 UTC ---
In case it is of interest, here is the generating command for the tblgen
executable. I don't know how to turn this into a test case as it seems to use
only pregenerated c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53442
Bug #: 53442
Summary: llvm 2.9 tblgen executable possibly miscompiled with
gcc 4.7.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-21
19:26:32 UTC ---
Essentially the problem is that check_narrowing doesn't know how to handle type
conversion operators or anything more sophisticated than just scalars as init
and gives up. The issue sh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53183
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-05-21
18:56:53 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon May 21 18:56:35 2012
New Revision: 187732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187732
Log:
2012-05-21 Andrew Pinski
PR bootstrap
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&hl=ro&v=_Sl3Ox7RMnE
To unsubscribe please send email to unsubscr...@cc.psd-prahova.ro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53132
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-21
18:45:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Manuel, any idea what is going on here?
Not much. The instantiation context starts from the input_location, and that is
pointing to ../include/c++/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-21
18:23:17 UTC ---
P.S. You could have asked on the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org mailing list. Since it's
one of the most widely-used distros it's safe to assume that GCC builds on F16
x86_64 for everyone else
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-05-21
18:20:15 UTC ---
On x86_64 GCC defaults to a "multilib" compiler, meaning one that can produce
code for both x84_64 and x86 i.e both 64-bit and 32-bit objects.
In order to do that it needs 32-bit gl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700
--- Comment #5 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-21
18:14:07 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon May 21 18:14:01 2012
New Revision: 187730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187730
Log:
2012-05-21 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/52
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2012-05-21
18:04:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 27463
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27463
test case
--enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-checking
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120521 (experimental) [trunk revision 187727] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/t.cc
/home/ryan/t.cc:18:1: error: generic thunk code fails for method 'virtual void
Test::Log(const char*, ...)' which uses '...'
}};
^
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53422
--- Comment #3 from Dan Nicolaescu 2012-05-21
16:53:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The reason for the extra fields in BARRIER and CODE_LABEL is to make it
> possible for a BARRIER or CODE_LABEL to be turned into
> INSN/JUMP_INSN/CALL_INSN.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53389
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-05-21
16:16:24 UTC ---
If one duplicates "filler" and renames it to inner/outer with the call:
x=outer(inner(y, real(2*i)), real(i))
one sees four calls to gfc_conv_procedure_call for: outer, inner, outer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52700
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-05-21
17:34:39 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon May 21 17:34:25 2012
New Revision: 187728
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187728
Log:
2012-05-21 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-05-21
16:27:55 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Mon May 21 16:27:40 2012
New Revision: 187724
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187724
Log:
PR java/52815
* class.c (emit_registe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53430
--- Comment #3 from George R. Goffe 2012-05-21
17:14:25 UTC ---
Thank you for this information.
I'm not terribly conversant with the internals with GCC so please let me ask
this question.
This system is x86_64 and I'm presuming that the GCC bui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13822
Dan Nicolaescu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52815
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418
--- Comment #5 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-05-21
16:47:47 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon May 21 16:47:32 2012
New Revision: 187726
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187726
Log:
PR c/53418
* c-typeck.c (build_conditiona
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53411
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2012-05-21
16:52:06 UTC ---
Odd. The following is in 190r.asmcons:
(insn 39 51 141 3 (set (reg:DI 135 [ D.1745 ])
(sign_extend:DI (reg:SI 132 [ j ]))) regehr.c:22 122
{*extendsidi2_rex64}
(expr_list
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53132
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53159
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-21
15:59:44 UTC ---
Before fiddling with always inline, I would rather add 3 overloads of
operator<< for float, double and long double, using __rep instead of real and
imag. But I don't have a strong opin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53399
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53439
Bug #: 53439
Summary: g++ generates buggy code with optimisation flags
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53399
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21 15:46:34 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon May 21 15:46:25 2012
New Revision: 187722
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187722
Log:
PR target/53399
* config/i386/i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53361
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2012-05-21
15:30:45 UTC ---
Richard, I'm not asking that it be possible to link together code compiled in
C++98 and C++11 mode. I'm asking that gcc be able to build in C++11 mode at
all. If libstdc++.so exposed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53433
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
Bug #: 53438
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bitfield store replaced with
full-byte store
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-21
15:21:19 UTC ---
Whoops, left off the compile command:
g++ -o YarrPattern.o -S -O3 ./YarrPattern.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40821
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-21 15:12:24 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 21 15:12:13 2012
New Revision: 187720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187720
Log:
/cp
2012-05-21 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40821
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53438
--- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2012-05-21
15:17:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 27462
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27462
Unreduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-21 15:12:22 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon May 21 15:12:13 2012
New Revision: 187720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187720
Log:
/cp
2012-05-21 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53409
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
14:27:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 14:27:10 2012
New Revision: 187716
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187716
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53409
* tree-vect-loop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53148
--- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers 2012-05-21
14:42:40 UTC ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Mon May 21 14:42:26 2012
New Revision: 187718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187718
Log:
PR c/53148
* c-typeck.c (build_conditiona
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53366
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
14:29:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 14:29:11 2012
New Revision: 187717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187717
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53366
* tree-vect-slp.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53410
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-05-21
14:25:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon May 21 14:25:03 2012
New Revision: 187715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187715
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53410
* fold-const.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53418
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53426
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2012-05-21 13:40:05 UTC
---
> Hum. IPA-PTA ... yeah ... :/
>
> Mine I guess (note ipa-pta is experimental).
>
> Honza - we are trying to access the varinfo for
> _ZTIN5boost16exception_detail19error_info_injector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53437
Bug #: 53437
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c -O0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53435
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2012-05-21 13:13:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 27460 [details]
> proposed patch for fixing
Please submit it to gcc-patches mailing list.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53425
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21
13:07:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 21 13:07:11 2012
New Revision: 187713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187713
Log:
Use unspec_volatile on rdrand_1
gcc/
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53416
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21
12:59:58 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 21 12:59:53 2012
New Revision: 187712
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187712
Log:
Use unspec_volatile on rdrand_1
gcc/
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53425
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-21
12:48:43 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 21 12:48:38 2012
New Revision: 187711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187711
Log:
Warn passing SSE argument ABI change for -m6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-05-21
12:46:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon May 21 12:45:59 2012
New Revision: 187710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187710
Log:
2012-05-21 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53408
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
