[Bug target/52554] Variable called $1 causes invalid asm to be generated

2012-04-03 Thread rwxr-xr-x at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52554 Lukas Mai changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/52796] [C++11] Initialization of primitive object with 0-length parameter pack fails to value-initialize

2012-04-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

2012-04-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra 2012-04-04 01:11:47 UTC --- Interesting. gcc revision? I've held back on svn update after hearing that richi had broken the tree for powerpc. The uncaught exception might be an eh_frame problem like that in http:

[Bug c++/52859] New: ICE ("Error reporting routines re-entered") on highly recursive template code

2012-04-03 Thread jewillco at osl dot iu.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52859 Bug #: 52859 Summary: ICE ("Error reporting routines re-entered") on highly recursive template code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: U

[Bug ada/52858] New: gnatmake ignores -R (Do not use a run_path_option ...) when linking dynamic libraries

2012-04-03 Thread auto33980527 at hushmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52858 Bug #: 52858 Summary: gnatmake ignores -R (Do not use a run_path_option ...) when linking dynamic libraries Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 S

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-04 00:19:29 UTC --- I can reliably reproduce that uncaught exception, which should be caught by the handler on line 134, but not a double-free

[Bug c++/52796] [C++11] Initialization of primitive object with 0-length parameter pack fails to value-initialize

2012-04-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-03 23:38:25 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 3 23:38:21 2012 New Revision: 186122 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186122 Log: PR c++/52796 * pt.c (tsubst_initializer_lis

[Bug c++/52796] [C++11] Initialization of primitive object with 0-length parameter pack fails to value-initialize

2012-04-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-03 23:37:16 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 3 23:37:11 2012 New Revision: 186121 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186121 Log: PR c++/52796 * pt.c (tsubst_initializer_lis

[Bug debug/52857] [x32] DW_OP_GNU_regval_type doesn't handle ARG_POINTER_REGNUM properly with -maddress-mode=long

2012-04-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2012-04-03 23:28:42 UTC --- Does this patch diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.c b/gcc/dwarf2out.c index ca88fc5..935c86f 100644 --- a/gcc/dwarf2out.c +++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.c @@ -11664,7 +11664,8 @@ mem_loc_descriptor (rtx rtl,

[Bug debug/52857] New: [x32] DW_OP_GNU_regval_type doesn't handle ARG_POINTER_REGNUM properly with -maddress-mode=long

2012-04-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52857 Bug #: 52857 Summary: [x32] DW_OP_GNU_regval_type doesn't handle ARG_POINTER_REGNUM properly with -maddress-mode=long Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/52796] [C++11] Initialization of primitive object with 0-length parameter pack fails to value-initialize

2012-04-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-04-03 22:51:14 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Apr 3 22:51:08 2012 New Revision: 186120 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186120 Log: PR c++/52796 * pt.c (tsubst_initializer_lis

[Bug middle-end/52856] New: misuse of MODE_SIZE vice MODE_PRECISION in get_mode_bounds

2012-04-03 Thread bigotp at acm dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52856 Bug #: 52856 Summary: misuse of MODE_SIZE vice MODE_PRECISION in get_mode_bounds Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug preprocessor/52852] [C++11] The preprocessor fails to parse multi-line c++0x/c++11 raw strings.

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52852 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCONF

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-03 21:33:19 UTC --- I haven't managed to reproduce a double-free on gcc110 in the compile farm, but did get this: #0 0x0080ef73a5fc in __GI_raise (sig=) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c

[Bug c++/52851] auto&& fails to deduce type in function template

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52851 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-03 21:18:26 UTC --- already fixed on trunk, I think this is a dup of PR 51547

[Bug c/52855] New: ARM: Internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109

2012-04-03 Thread mpthompson at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52855 Bug #: 52855 Summary: ARM: Internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

2012-04-03 Thread fabien at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fabien at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug libitm/52854] [x32] libitm failures on x32

2012-04-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52854 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p |

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

2012-04-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #4 from dcb 2012-04-03 19:31:58 UTC --- Finally, I managed to get delta to do something useful. Minimal test case attached.

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

2012-04-03 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 --- Comment #3 from dcb 2012-04-03 19:29:11 UTC --- Created attachment 27079 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27079 C++ source code

[Bug libitm/52854] New: [x32] libitm failures on x32

2012-04-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52854 Bug #: 52854 Summary: [x32] libitm failures on x32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/52853] New: problem in stddef.h, Blender build fails

2012-04-03 Thread montagne29 at wanadoo dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52853 Bug #: 52853 Summary: problem in stddef.h, Blender build fails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug preprocessor/52852] New: The preprocessor fails to parse multi-line c++0x/c++11 raw strings.

2012-04-03 Thread bcmpinc at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52852 Bug #: 52852 Summary: The preprocessor fails to parse multi-line c++0x/c++11 raw strings. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52851] auto&& fails to deduce type in function template

2012-04-03 Thread delong.j at fb dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52851 --- Comment #2 from Jordan DeLong 2012-04-03 19:07:21 UTC --- In that case it would be a bug that it works outside of a template, no? But I don't think this is actually supposed to declare an rvalue reference. The && on an auto works more like

[Bug c++/52851] auto&& fails to deduce type in function template

2012-04-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52851 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-04-03 18:57:01 UTC --- You cannot bind a rvalue reference to a lvalue.

[Bug c++/52851] New: auto&& fails to deduce type in function template

2012-04-03 Thread delong.j at fb dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52851 Bug #: 52851 Summary: auto&& fails to deduce type in function template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug bootstrap/52850] New: Linker path ends up using wrong zlib

2012-04-03 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52850 Bug #: 52850 Summary: Linker path ends up using wrong zlib Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/52784] i386-apple-darwin multilib bootstrap broken

2012-04-03 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52784 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/52849] crash when using suscript operator in delctype argument

2012-04-03 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849 --- Comment #1 from freunddeslichts at web dot de 2012-04-03 18:25:46 UTC --- Created attachment 27078 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27078 testcase

[Bug c++/52849] New: crash when using suscript operator in delctype argument

2012-04-03 Thread freunddeslichts at web dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52849 Bug #: 52849 Summary: crash when using suscript operator in delctype argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug target/52848] New: [x32] *load_tp_x32 in i386.md isn't necessary

2012-04-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52848 Bug #: 52848 Summary: [x32] *load_tp_x32 in i386.md isn't necessary Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug other/52847] New: "case" shell quoting problem in top-level makefile

2012-04-03 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52847 Bug #: 52847 Summary: "case" shell quoting problem in top-level makefile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-04-03 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-04-03 17:13:27 UTC --- Created attachment 27077 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27077 reduced testcase Reduced with c_reduce (still needs hashtab.gcda) $ gcc -funroll-loops -ftr

[Bug libgcj/52645] gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

2012-04-03 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 --- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-04-03 17:01:49 UTC --- Attached patch works for me.

[Bug target/52842] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] LDBL_MIN_* wrong for IBM long double

2012-04-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52842 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52804] IRA/RELOAD allocate wrong register on ARM for cortex-m0

2012-04-03 Thread amker.cheng at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52804 --- Comment #1 from amker.cheng 2012-04-03 16:43:30 UTC --- For insns before ira: (insn 82 81 83 3 (set (reg/f:SI 281 [ *o_15(D) ]) (mem/f:SI (reg/v/f:SI 315 [orig:275 o ] [275]) [2 *o_15(D)+0 S4 A32])) pr52804.c:18 186 {*thumb1_movsi_i

[Bug target/52842] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] LDBL_MIN_* wrong for IBM long double

2012-04-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52842 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug regression/52834] [4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) in check_tag_decl

2012-04-03 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52834 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52671] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE with misplaced attribute on enum

2012-04-03 Thread doko at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52671 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug fortran/40973] Mark PRIVATE module functions as STATIC to faciliate optimization

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40973 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/52751] private module variable are not exported as local

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52751 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-04-03 15:15:31 UTC --- Another caveat (as in PR40973): If the variable has a C-binding (other than 'bind(C,name="")'), it is accessible from other translation units. (Actually, NAG exactly handles it like

[Bug c++/52844] ICE

2012-04-03 Thread dave at boostpro dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52844 --- Comment #1 from Dave Abrahams 2012-04-03 15:06:08 UTC --- I think the problem is simple: missing initial type argument to vector_c in: template auto apply_tuple(F f, Tuple const & t, vector_c)

[Bug fortran/52846] New: [F2008] Support submodules

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846 Bug #: 52846 Summary: [F2008] Support submodules Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c++/52845] New: non-void return type deduced for lambda with empty compound statement

2012-04-03 Thread mattipee at yahoo dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52845 Bug #: 52845 Summary: non-void return type deduced for lambda with empty compound statement Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c++/52844] New: ICE

2012-04-03 Thread dave at boostpro dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52844 Bug #: 52844 Summary: ICE Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ A

[Bug fortran/52751] private module variable are not exported as local

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52751 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status|UN

[Bug c++/52796] [C++11] Initialization of primitive object with 0-length parameter pack fails to value-initialize

2012-04-03 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52796 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52679] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52406] [4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52406 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/52406] [4.7 Regression] likely wrong code bug

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52406 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 14:30:38 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 14:30:32 2012 New Revision: 186108 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186108 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug c++/52744] bad handling of member (function) pointers in template parameters

2012-04-03 Thread blaffablaffa at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52744 --- Comment #7 from Lorenzo Pistone 2012-04-03 14:29:38 UTC --- Created attachment 27075 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27075 test case with free function pointers

[Bug c++/52744] bad handling of member (function) pointers in template parameters

2012-04-03 Thread blaffablaffa at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52744 --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Pistone 2012-04-03 14:28:57 UTC --- Same problem with free function pointers. See free_functions.cpp

[Bug fortran/52679] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug fortran/52679] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

2012-04-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52679 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26962|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug fortran/52843] New: Unexpected rejection of pure recursive function

2012-04-03 Thread fmartinez at gmv dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52843 Bug #: 52843 Summary: Unexpected rejection of pure recursive function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-04-03 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-04-03 14:08:36 UTC --- Created attachment 27073 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27073 unreduced testcase Unfortunately LTO bootstrap with bootstrap-profiled still fails even after

[Bug target/52842] New: [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] LDBL_MIN_* wrong for IBM long double

2012-04-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52842 Bug #: 52842 Summary: [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 regression] LDBL_MIN_* wrong for IBM long double Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: U

[Bug middle-end/52580] [4.8 Regression] 171.swim performance drop on x86 – vectorization doesn’t happen anymore

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 13:06:03 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 13:05:58 2012 New Revision: 186107 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186107 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fabien at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/52837] ICE in cp/mangle.c:3306

2012-04-03 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52837 Matt Godbolt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/52759] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in cp/mangle.c

2012-04-03 Thread matt at godbolt dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52759 Matt Godbolt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at godbolt dot org --- Comment #7 fro

[Bug c++/52841] [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.3 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/52841] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable'

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52841 Bug #: 52841 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] error: type 'Solvable' is not a base type for type 'Resolvable' Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

[Bug middle-end/52493] [4.8 Regression] tree check fail in ptr_derefs_may_alias_p

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52493 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 11:55:29 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 11:55:24 2012 New Revision: 186105 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186105 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug other/52754] [4.7 Regression] indirect indexing broken with -fpredictive-commoning

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52754 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug other/52754] [4.7 Regression] indirect indexing broken with -fpredictive-commoning

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52754 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 11:55:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 11:55:24 2012 New Revision: 186105 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186105 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 11:55:29 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 11:55:24 2012 New Revision: 186105 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186105 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug middle-end/52701] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52701 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 11:55:30 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 11:55:24 2012 New Revision: 186105 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186105 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/52808] [4.8 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52808 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2012-04-03 11:38:10 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 3 11:38:04 2012 New Revision: 186104 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186104 Log: 2012-04-03 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug bootstrap/52840] bootstrap fails in libstdc++, missing compatibility.lo

2012-04-03 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52840 --- Comment #2 from Bernhard Reutner-Fischer 2012-04-03 10:20:07 UTC --- The patchlet below reinstates bootstrapping for me. diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog index bb8bc2a..d662ec1 100644 --- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog

[Bug tree-optimization/52678] [4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-loop-manip.c:1842

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52678 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||52701 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guen

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

2012-04-03 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 --- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-04-03 09:46:30 UTC --- > --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-03 > 08:56:13 UTC --- > Reverting: > > * src/c++98/compatibility-ldbl.cc: Guard with PIC > > fixes the failure. B

[Bug tree-optimization/52797] [4.8 Regression] Revision 185913 causes ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 on PowerPC

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52797 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-04-03 09:19:01 UTC --- I'll have to wait until I've built trunk on power to debug it, but this should only be possible if two threads can both decrement an atomic counter to zero, which might imply a race

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

2012-04-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52756] [4.8 Regression] 255.vortex in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to build

2012-04-03 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52756 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/52797] [4.8 Regression] Revision 185913 causes ICE in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:831 on PowerPC

2012-04-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52797 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-04-03 09:07:46 UTC --- I successfully bootstrapped revision 186090 on powerpc-apple-darwin9. From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-04/msg00234.html it seems also fixed for powerpc64-unknown-

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

2012-04-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-03 09:05:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 3 09:05:00 2012 New Revision: 186103 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186103 Log: PR tree-optimization/52835 * tree-data-ref.

[Bug java/52805] [4.8 Regression] 243 new GCC HEAD@185977 regressions (libjava failures)

2012-04-03 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52805 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

2012-04-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 --- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2012-04-03 08:56:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > This fix also causes following testsuite failure on alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu: > > Running target unix > FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-static) (test f

[Bug middle-end/52835] [4.7/4.8 Regression] -O3 wrongly optimizes loop __builtin_memcpy away

2012-04-03 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52835 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-04-03 08:49:18 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Apr 3 08:49:14 2012 New Revision: 186101 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=186101 Log: PR tree-optimization/52835 * tree-data-ref.

[Bug libstdc++/52839] double free or corruption running tr1/.../default_weaktoshared.exe

2012-04-03 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52839 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/52840] bootstrap fails in libstdc++, missing compatibility.lo

2012-04-03 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52840 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bkoz at redhat dot com --- Com

[Bug libstdc++/52689] static linking with libstdc++ fails

2012-04-03 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52689 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #11 fr

[Bug bootstrap/52840] New: bootstrap fails in libstdc++, missing compatibility.lo

2012-04-03 Thread aldot at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52840 Bug #: 52840 Summary: bootstrap fails in libstdc++, missing compatibility.lo Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal